| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
05-21-2002, 04:26 AM
|
#1
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
|
EVOLUTION IV vs Subaru WRX STi Version III
Which one would win in a 1/4 mile, both stock standard, everything equal (e.g drivers and tyres and etc). No F*cking around, just choose either the EVO IV or the WRX STi?
|
|
|
|
05-21-2002, 01:43 PM
|
#2
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 10
|
wrx
i belive wrx will win although i don't like to see it from happening...........
|
|
|
|
|
05-23-2002, 12:10 AM
|
#3
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 65
|
i highly doubt the WRX would win, the EVO is a faster car in 0-60 and quarter mile, im not sure what the times are thou.....i do believe the EVO should be quicker, i know the EVO VII is faster than the new STI.
|
|
|
|
|
05-23-2002, 04:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
|
Like i said, no F*cking around, i don't want to hear about over EVO's or WRX's, just want to know who would win, STi Version III or EVOlUTION IV - not the I, II, III, V, VI, or VII, just the IV.
|
|
|
|
|
05-23-2002, 01:21 PM
|
#5
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 10
|
proven....
i am quite sure that records done by past drivers(including those in magazines) had shown that sti III has a slight better performance than evo iv.........
juz face the reality.........
although its true that new evos has prove to be faster than the new sti...
|
|
|
|
|
05-23-2002, 06:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
|
In the "MOTOR" mag, the compared an EVO 6.5 vs EVO 7 vs STi (the new STi). 0-100kmph, the EVO 6.5 comes out on top with 5.56 sceonds, then the STi with 6.26 Seconds and then the EVO 7 with 6.7 Seconds. Those are some pretty slow times - and i'm sure they do alot better times than that, but still the are representative of the cars performance, because they were all tested with the same driver(even if he was crap). And in the quater mile they were tested and they came 1st: EVO 6.5(13.58) , 2nd: STi(14.14), 3rd: EVO 7(14.38), this proves that the New STi is faster than the New EVO (EVO 7), but also they said that, both of the EVO's were a much more pleasurable drive than the STi any day, meaning they handled alot better.
|
|
|
|
|
05-23-2002, 10:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: city, New York
Posts: 5,743
|
damn those times are horrible for those cars!! hes around a second off on everything.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX, Pro-Car FAIS, Comptech Uni-filter, ARK DTS exhaust, Rm racing headers, Tein S-tech springs.
Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2002, 10:37 AM
|
#8
|
|
Pretty much amazing
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 3,771
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Integra Si VTEC
In the "MOTOR" mag, the compared an EVO 6.5 vs EVO 7 vs STi (the new STi). 0-100kmph, the EVO 6.5 comes out on top with 5.56 sceonds, then the STi with 6.26 Seconds and then the EVO 7 with 6.7 Seconds. Those are some pretty slow times - and i'm sure they do alot better times than that, but still the are representative of the cars performance, because they were all tested with the same driver(even if he was crap). And in the quater mile they were tested and they came 1st: EVO 6.5(13.58) , 2nd: STi(14.14), 3rd: EVO 7(14.38), this proves that the New STi is faster than the New EVO (EVO 7), but also they said that, both of the EVO's were a much more pleasurable drive than the STi any day, meaning they handled alot better.
|
Wow. My friend's WRX does 0-62 mph (0-100 km/h) in about 6 seconds. I disappointed if that's what the STi is pulling.
__________________
ec437 on grammar;
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ec437
I'd've
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2strokebloke
Any car built by "Dr. Technology" is probably not worth $5000
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-24-2002, 02:56 PM
|
#9
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 930
|
Are you sure youre talking about a STi? Thats closer to the 0-60 time of a regular wrx.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com
'92 S13 coupe
KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs
Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe
Cone Filter
Next up: LSD
RIP #05 
|
|
|
|
|
05-27-2002, 11:30 PM
|
#10
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 12
|
Yeah, it is an STi i'm talking about, and i'd state my reputation on it that it can pull in the 5 second area with ease, but i guess the driver was crap, but still, the tests were done by a single driver, so it still is valid, even if the driver was crap. So don't think that you WRX oweners can go around and start beating STi's, coz u know what the real deal is.
|
|
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 04:23 AM
|
#11
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1
|
What does it matter? Unless your racing them on a track what reason would do you need in having the fastest car available? So one's faster then the other, when and where are you going to show it off at, at some underground street race? 
|
|
|
|
|
08-16-2003, 02:50 AM
|
#12
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buffalo Grove
Posts: 96
|
Re: EVOLUTION IV vs Subaru WRX STi Version III
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ralliart
i highly doubt the WRX would win, the EVO is a faster car in 0-60 and quarter mile, im not sure what the times are thou.....i do believe the EVO should be quicker, i know the EVO VII is faster than the new STI.
|
Where the hell did you get that kind of info???   
Anyway I say the Ver. III 
__________________
UU-UR-EX
|
|
|
|
|
DriverSide Home |
Service & Repair |
Car Prices |
Parts & Accessories |
Reviews & Advice |
My Garage
