| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
07-08-2005, 04:49 PM
|
#1
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1
|
3.4 liter camaro v.s gt mustang
all i have to say is that i read that a 3.4 liter camaro cant touch a gt well i smoked a 98 gt mustang it was only like 1 1/2 cars but i beat him both stock both automatic but i won
|
|
|
|
07-08-2005, 09:37 PM
|
#2
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 730
|
thats  , theres no way your stock 3.4 liter camaro would come close to touching a 98 mustang gt, whether it was automatic or not 
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2005, 09:56 PM
|
#3
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hicksville, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,351
|
Eh, that GT was in the bad years of the 4.6 when it was still finding itself. If it happened it happened. If you did beat him though his engine wasn't running 100%.
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him.......
silly rabbit, tricks are for kids...
I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lars Ulrich
What?! Record sales are slumping? Must be from all those pirates. Can't be because we started sucking 10 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2005, 10:51 PM
|
#4
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
|
Re: 3.4 liter camaro v.s gt mustang
I can believe a 4th gen. 200 HP 3.8L V6 Camaro beating a '94-'98 Mustang GT, but I have trouble believing that a 3.4L could do it, both stock and automatic.
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. 
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2005, 02:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
|
Re: 3.4 liter camaro v.s gt mustang
Agreed, the 98 was a bad year but still well enough to off to take down a 3.4 camaro. This is either BS or the GT wasn't racing.
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2005, 04:43 PM
|
#6
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 989
|
i dont think those mustang transmissions are exactly the best... i know the 4L60E is much better(from what i hear)...
__________________
-Tony- Sold my Z28 looong ago. Now sporting an '03 TJ. 
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2005, 07:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
|
Re: 3.4 liter camaro v.s gt mustang
The mustangs transmission would definately benefit from a shift kit, its strong but sluggish. I think the GT would win hands down against a 3.4 liter though. If it was the 3.8 it would be almost believable.
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 08:31 PM
|
#8
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sunnyvale/Santa Monica, California
Posts: 23
|
How about this? Both cars suck, who cares?
|
|
|
|
|
07-11-2005, 08:41 PM
|
#9
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
|
Re: 3.4 liter camaro v.s gt mustang
You or you wouldn't have checked out the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2005, 07:24 AM
|
#10
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,274
|
Why buy a V6 Camaro? I don't care if you beat him you bought a Camaro and didn't buy the V8, thats disappointing in itself
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SiGNAL748
I have an outrageously large penis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2005, 09:34 AM
|
#11
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 989
|
oooh,
maybe he was running on 6 or 7 cylinders? was the driver 400+ lbs?
__________________
-Tony- Sold my Z28 looong ago. Now sporting an '03 TJ.
|
|
|
|
|
DriverSide Home |
Service & Repair |
Car Prices |
Parts & Accessories |
Reviews & Advice |
My Garage
