Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Become a fan of Igor Sushko on Facebook!
-
Please Register or Login to access: DriverSide DriverSide Home | Service & Repair | Car Prices | Parts & Accessories | Reviews & Advice | My Garage
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Blazer
Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2005, 09:59 PM   #1
blazer94
AF Enthusiast
 
blazer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: chicago, Illinois
Posts: 113
blazer94 Normal reputation
Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

Any opinions on temp rating for the following application: short ( 5-10 min) drives, low speed (25-35 mph) in a 4.3 l cpi 1994. I am currently running 180 deg., yet I am wondering if my engine is gettting warmed up enough. The temps outside are warming, yet my temp gauge (100, 210 300) seems to hover around approx. 160-170 deg. Any input would be appreciated.
__________________
Trailblazer 2005.
2WD LS
Brand new, No Mods Yet!
blazer94 is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:15 AM   #2
Rick Norwood
AF Enthusiast
 
Rick Norwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Deep Dark Doo-doo
Posts: 976
Rick Norwood Normal reputation
Re: Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazer94
Any opinions on temp rating for the following application: short ( 5-10 min) drives, low speed (25-35 mph) in a 4.3 l cpi 1994. I am currently running 180 deg., yet I am wondering if my engine is gettting warmed up enough. The temps outside are warming, yet my temp gauge (100, 210 300) seems to hover around approx. 160-170 deg. Any input would be appreciated.
If my information is correct, these trucks are designed to run with a 195° T-Stat in them. If you are running a 180° T-Stat and only getting 160°-170° your T-Stat might be stuck open, but in any case, you are running too cold.

There is a theory that in places where the temperature is extreme like in Arizona and southern California that the 195° T-Stat is not needed. But even though I live in Arizona, I have learned my lesson about trying to out smart the Boys in Detroit. Install a 195° T-Stat in your truck. If you have over heating issues, don't blame the T-Stat, this would indicate it is time for a reverse power flush or some other type of cooling system maintenance.
Rick Norwood is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:55 AM   #3
BlazerBoyLT98
AF Enthusiast
 
BlazerBoyLT98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Peabody, Massachusetts
Posts: 947
BlazerBoyLT98 Normal reputation
Send a message via AIM to BlazerBoyLT98 Send a message via Yahoo to BlazerBoyLT98
You engine definitely is not getting hot enough and you will be losing gas mileage without a doubt.
__________________
2002 Pontiac Gram Am
K&N Air Filter
Mobil1 5W-30 Extended 15K
2 JL Audio 12" Subs Sealed JL Audio Box
Coustic 400 Watt Class D Mono Amp
Pioneer Head Unit 50X4 MP3, WMA, AAC Super Tuner
Polk DB750 6.5" all around
Yankees Suck!!!!!!!!
BlazerBoyLT98 is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 09:55 AM   #4
TonyMazz
AF Enthusiast
 
TonyMazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 303
TonyMazz Normal reputation
I had a T-stat stuck open and temp was way too low...160 range. The close loop for emissions I believe is 158 so things barely hint the close loop. Hence my MPG dropped like rock to 13-15...installed new 195-degree and the MPG rose back to 18-21mpg.
__________________
1999 Blazer LS 4WD 4.3L "W"
2004 Silverado 2500HD Duramax
TonyMazz is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 12:52 PM   #5
blazee
IT'S GOOD TO BE THE KING!
 
blazee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Palace
Posts: 5,536
blazee +50blazee +50
Re: Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

I suggest you change the stat to a 192/195 and start letting you engine warm up a little before you leave. Those driving conditions can actually double your engine wear:

1. Today's engines operate at high temperatures to fight combustion by-products and pollution. Lowering the temp below 175-180 won't accomplish this.

2. Engine oils are designed to work over a specific temperature range with optimum performance starting at temperatures that require the coolant to be the very same 175ish range.

3.Your engine forms moisture inside when it cools and condensates on the walls of the inside. This moisture then is washed down into the oil when started and then awaits vaporization by internal temperatures rising enough to bring the moisture to the appropriate corrected vapor point (boiling). If enough moisture is left behind it combines with combustion byproducts to form acids that become dissolved in the oil itself. The oil becomes more acidic as the age of the oil progresses and picks on certain parts eventually. Also moisture will corrode other surfaces. So, it's important to get these engines to a satisfying operating temperature as soon as possible. Usually oil pooling temps are about 30 to 40 degrees higher than the coolant temps. This is a generalised statement and can vary with load and engine design but you can see why you want your oil over 212 degrees to boil out the moiture immediately!
__________________
Like this post? Hate it?

<----- Click the and tell me what you think.
blazee is offline  
Old 05-10-2005, 01:20 PM   #6
blazer94
AF Enthusiast
 
blazer94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: chicago, Illinois
Posts: 113
blazer94 Normal reputation
Re: Re: Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Norwood
If my information is correct, these trucks are designed to run with a 195° T-Stat in them. If you are running a 180° T-Stat and only getting 160°-170° your T-Stat might be stuck open, but in any case, you are running too cold.

There is a theory that in places where the temperature is extreme like in Arizona and southern California that the 195° T-Stat is not needed. But even though I live in Arizona, I have learned my lesson about trying to out smart the Boys in Detroit. Install a 195° T-Stat in your truck. If you have over heating issues, don't blame the T-Stat, this would indicate it is time for a reverse power flush or some other type of cooling system maintenance.
Thanks everyone for your input, I had a feeling that it would be the case to go back to the 195 T-stat. I replaced the heater core and radiator back in 10/94, and when i did the motor I put in new water pump w/ 180 t-stat. Changing back to ac-delco 195 this afternoon. Thanks again everyone.

Thought I'd tell why I put 180 deg. in the first place. On a sunday, when I changed the water pump (ac/delco), I'd forgotten to get a t-stat. Went to Murrays (they sell ac/delco parts) to get replacement, had to be ordered. In stock was prestone 180, so I figured , eh, I'll run a little cooler, and idiot that I am, and knowing in the back of my mind that 15 deg. does make a difference, (and figuring it was winter, shouldn't make a difference) went ahead and used it. Moral of the story: never take a fools ( my own ) advice without consulting others!
__________________
Trailblazer 2005.
2WD LS
Brand new, No Mods Yet!
blazer94 is offline  
Old 03-11-2006, 05:29 PM   #7
excheezhead
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: pembroke pines, Florida
Posts: 180
excheezhead Normal reputation
Re: Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazer94
Thanks everyone for your input, I had a feeling that it would be the case to go back to the 195 T-stat. I replaced the heater core and radiator back in 10/94, and when i did the motor I put in new water pump w/ 180 t-stat. Changing back to ac-delco 195 this afternoon. Thanks again everyone.

Thought I'd tell why I put 180 deg. in the first place. On a sunday, when I changed the water pump (ac/delco), I'd forgotten to get a t-stat. Went to Murrays (they sell ac/delco parts) to get replacement, had to be ordered. In stock was prestone 180, so I figured , eh, I'll run a little cooler, and idiot that I am, and knowing in the back of my mind that 15 deg. does make a difference, (and figuring it was winter, shouldn't make a difference) went ahead and used it. Moral of the story: never take a fools ( my own ) advice without consulting others!
i put a "JET PERFORMANCE 180 TYPE" t-stat in my 01 4.3l, and it works fine, but i must justify. i eliminated the hp sucking drag monster of a fan/clutch driven off water pump for a "will not be FLEX able about endorcing products" dual fan with thermostatic controls. this way, living in the capital of south america, miami, i can run 3-5 deg less and get the ponies back without fan/clutch drag. i can adjust it to keep in the same temp band when the winter, way down to 40's, hits, and i can find my manual on heater operations.
just my 2 cents.
excheezhead is offline  
Old 03-12-2006, 06:14 AM   #8
blazee
IT'S GOOD TO BE THE KING!
 
blazee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Palace
Posts: 5,536
blazee +50blazee +50
Re: Thermostat:180 deg. vs. 190/192 deg.

Check the dates before posting. This thread is nearly a year old.
__________________
Like this post? Hate it?

<----- Click the and tell me what you think.
blazee is offline  
 
 
 
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Blazer

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts