Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Visit IgorSushko.com and see what it's like racing in Japan
-
Google  
Web AF
Become a subscriber. Browse a faster, ad-free AF. Instantly.

Automotive Forums > Chevrolet > Colorado - Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Member Map Calendar Surveys/Quiz Arcade Mark Forums Read

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2005, 12:53 AM   #1
57JagXKSS
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

The Trailblazer comes with this I-6 so why not the Colorado?



57JagXKSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 12:57 AM   #2
57JagXKSS
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
The Vortec 4200 I-6:

4.2 DOHC I-6 has 275 hp at 6,000 rpm and 275 lb-ft of torque at 3,600 rpm.

The Vortec 4200 I-6 has been one of Ward's ten best engines since 2002.

http://www.theautochannel.com/F/news...15/304690.html
57JagXKSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2005, 01:05 AM   #3
57JagXKSS
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
from chevyhiperformance.com

"To increase casting accuracy and minimize engine weight, the aluminum block and cylinder head of the Vortec 4200 I6 are made using a “lost foam” process. This casting technology provides both improved control of the manufacturing process and allows direct-mounted accessories that reduce vibration and weight. With the exception of the power-steering pump bracket, all engine accessories bolt directly to the engine."



"
One of the most interesting aspects of the Vortec 4200 I6 is what’s called variable-valve exhaust timing. This feature adjusts the exhaust camshaft timing within a range of 25 degrees as engine operating conditions change. To do that, an onboard computer first collects several points of data including throttle position, engine load, and vehicle speed. From there, a control valve adds or removes oil from a cavity and piston chamber (see cutaway photo) at the front of the camshaft. Thus, advancing or retarding the exhaust camshaft not only enhances the torque curve, but also improves idle quality and reduces emissions. With the ability to change timing, a more aggressive camshaft profile can also be used."

57JagXKSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 06:20 PM   #4
IFIXCARZ4U
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 44
Mostly due to the fact it won't fit there is barely room for the I-5 engine much less adding another 6" to the front of the engine
IFIXCARZ4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 06:20 PM   #5
IFIXCARZ4U
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 44
Mostly due to the fact it won't fit there is barely room for the I-5 engine much less adding another 6" to the front of the engine
IFIXCARZ4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2005, 08:22 PM   #6
57JagXKSS
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
really?

does anyone have pics of the Colorado's engine bay?
57JagXKSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2005, 08:49 AM   #7
Vettribution
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 214
Send a message via AIM to Vettribution Send a message via Yahoo to Vettribution
Re: Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

Yes, really... You could fit a v8 in there,or a v6.... but the i-6 will not fit.
__________________
New Vehicle & Project:
04' ZQ8 Chevrolet Colorado, Shortbed Regular Cab I-5. (Victory Red)
Best Dyno: 8.5 psi...390 HP & 430 lbs ft TQ.
Major Mod: Garrett GT35R Turbo...
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/811544.

Please... Come get some.
Vettribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2005, 11:50 PM   #8
57JagXKSS
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 345
Won't GM redesign the engine bay so that a 4.2 I-6 will fit?
57JagXKSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 11:55 PM   #9
Vettribution
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 214
Send a message via AIM to Vettribution Send a message via Yahoo to Vettribution
Re: Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?

Most likely wont happen.. or they would have done it in the first place. The engine bay just isnt that long.. but it is wide enough for more engine.. Which is why you could fit the V8
__________________
New Vehicle & Project:
04' ZQ8 Chevrolet Colorado, Shortbed Regular Cab I-5. (Victory Red)
Best Dyno: 8.5 psi...390 HP & 430 lbs ft TQ.
Major Mod: Garrett GT35R Turbo...
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/811544.

Please... Come get some.
Vettribution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2005, 08:18 PM   #10
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
I think GM should redesign it to fit the I-6.


Last edited by Jaguar D-Type : 09-18-2005 at 04:58 PM.
Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 09:48 PM   #11
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
The Vortec 4200 six–cylinder engine now generates 291 hp in the 2006 Trailblazer at 6000 rpm and 277 lb.–ft. of torque at 3600 rpm. 90 percent of the torque is available from 1600 rpm to 5600 rpm.
Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005, 04:19 AM   #12
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543


Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 04:20 PM   #13
Jaguar D-Type
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,543
Anyone else?
Jaguar D-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
 
AF Assistant
 

These Ads Open in New Window
 
Reply

Automotive Forums > Chevrolet > Colorado - Should the Colorado get the 4.2 275 hp I-6?
User Name
Password



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2000-2008 AutomotiveForums.com | Privacy Statement