Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Visit IgorSushko.com and see what it's like racing in Japan
-
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche/C&K/Silverado/Suburban/Tahoe > C/K
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2005, 09:28 PM   #1
waterfowler05
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 40
waterfowler05 Normal reputation
Rear Differential

I got curious after reading the post the other day about lowering rear end gears. I looked into my 1998 K-1500 and found something out of the ordinary. My truck has a 3.42 rear end in it. Finding this out, I now realize why I have no power passing people and less power in general than other trucks equal to it. After speaking with some buddy's on this, none of them had even heard of GM putting a 3.42 rear end in their trucks. I was just as suprised as they were. Is this a common rear end? Would it be a good idea to change to a 3.73 or a 4.10?
waterfowler05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:34 PM   #2
J-Ri
AF Enthusiast
 
J-Ri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Shellsburg, Iowa
Posts: 2,774
J-Ri Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

I'd never heard of it either, but I did a search on Google, and it does exist. I didn't look closely at the results, but ut looked like all of them were on muscle cars. Type "3.42:1 chevy differential" in at www.google.com to see the results I got.

If it were my truck, I'd spend the money I would spend to regear on getting more horsepower out of the engine.
__________________
'04 Cavalier coupe M/T 2.2 Ecotec
Supercharged 14 PSI boost, charge air cooler, 42# injectors
Tuned with HP Tuners

'86 3/4 ton Silverado
350 V8, 4x4, 4" lift, 1 ton axles swapped, converted to 4 wheel disc
35" BFG Mud Terrain T/As
Shortened to 109.5" wheelbase for those tight trails

http://www.boycottpepsico.com/default.aspx

You see "Fresh oil, loose gravel"; I see "Free undercoating"
J-Ri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 01:08 AM   #3
abaird
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 450
abaird Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

I know a lot of new chevy trucks have the 3.42 rearends in them. Good gas mileage anyway.
__________________
2009 Silverado 1500
1993 Taurus SHO
2005 Yamaha GP1300R
abaird is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 01:09 AM   #4
skipr
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: huntington beach, California
Posts: 547
skipr Normal reputation
The 2005's have two choice's of ratio's 3:42 or 4:10 . This was my options accoring to the fleet manager. He said no longer offer the 3:73 (which I liked the best) so I went with the 4:10.
skipr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 01:13 AM   #5
MadMac56
AF Enthusiast
 
MadMac56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 183
MadMac56 Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

Mine has 3.08...talk about nutless
__________________
It's difficult to soar with eagles...When you're surrounded by turkeys!
MadMac56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 01:28 AM   #6
abaird
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 450
abaird Normal reputation
Re: Re: Rear Differential

Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMac56
Mine has 3.08...talk about nutless

Yeah...My 86 has the 3.08. Its pretty pathetic.
__________________
2009 Silverado 1500
1993 Taurus SHO
2005 Yamaha GP1300R
abaird is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 08:59 AM   #7
Sivart
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Choctaw, Oklahoma
Posts: 72
Sivart Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

Most of the Chevy/GMC 4x4's from 1988 to 1999 come out with 3.42 ratio unles you got the towing package from the factory and then it had 3.73 gears and 11 rear drums. The 3.42 is a decent ratio with stock tires if you dont tow that often. Much better than the 3.08 which came in the earlier trucks. I guess if you drove 80mph and up the 3.08's would be fine.
Sivart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 09:32 AM   #8
waterfowler05
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 40
waterfowler05 Normal reputation
I started to notice that my truck does not have the gitty up that my friends z71's do once I changed to 285/75 tires. I new something was up. When I had the 265's on this truck I would get about 16.5 mpg on the highway. But with the new tires, my mileage is about 13.5. Do you all think that I should spend the money and put a 3.73 rear end in to save gas mileage and increase my power? or should I just leave it alone?
waterfowler05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 10:45 AM   #9
Sivart
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Choctaw, Oklahoma
Posts: 72
Sivart Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

I got the same set up as you but I changed to 3.73 ratio. It drives like it did with the stock tires, maybe a bit better. I think it is worth it if you plan on keeping the truck.
Sivart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 07:37 PM   #10
acewelderman
AF Regular
 
acewelderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Concord, Michigan
Posts: 123
acewelderman Normal reputation
Re: Rear Differential

My 94 has 3.73 & bigger brakes w towing pakage also have trans & motor oil coolers from factory.I luv it !!!
__________________
JUST WELD IT !!
acewelderman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche/C&K/Silverado/Suburban/Tahoe > C/K

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts