| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
01-07-2005, 05:32 PM
|
#1
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 553
|
1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
Which is the ultimate car , what are the ups and downs, and overall which one would u pick
__________________
|
|
|
|
01-07-2005, 05:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,906
|
Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
Which Supra? MkIII?
I mean bang for the buck...you cant beat the 5.0 Stang
Handling wise out of the box...you gotta give it to the FC
I would choose the FC and drop a SR20DET or RB25DET into that sucker!!!
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2005, 06:26 PM
|
#3
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener
Posts: 553
|
ya all cars are 1987
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-07-2005, 08:15 PM
|
#4
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
|
Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
FC3S. It'll run circles around the other two on a road course.
|
|
|
|
|
01-08-2005, 04:42 AM
|
#5
|
|
Z Cars Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,739
|
Re: Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kman10587
FC3S. It'll run circles around the other two on a road course.
|
well actually, that import shootout video floating around this forum places the supra quite a bit faster than the FC3S on a road course. the supra finished a little over 2 full seconds before the FC....
as for road course performance, the supra will take it according to the video...
for bang for the buck...mustang but the supra is no slouch.
i would still take the FC3S but thats me... 
__________________
 ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
|
|
|
01-08-2005, 04:11 PM
|
#6
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
|
Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
Really, I wouldn't have expected that, what with the Supra's 3500 lb. curb weight and the FC's awesome suspension tuning. But I guess the difference in power really sealed the deal.
|
|
|
|
|
01-08-2005, 05:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
Z Cars Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 6,739
|
Re: Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kman10587
Really, I wouldn't have expected that, what with the Supra's 3500 lb. curb weight and the FC's awesome suspension tuning. But I guess the difference in power really sealed the deal.
|
must have...i didnt expect that either. what was even more surprising to me is that the supra was on the 300zxTT's ass at the very end of the race. but the 300zx driver did get a little off the road in one of the last turns. 
anybody know of a free video hosting website?!?!?!
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2005, 07:26 PM
|
#8
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 366
|
Re: 1987...5.0 mustang, rx-7 turboII, turbo supra
I'll take the 5.0 mostly due to the vast amount of performance upgrades available, and I like drag racing more than road racing so it suits me better. However, the FC is a very fun drive.
|
|
|
|
|
01-10-2005, 03:13 PM
|
#9
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
Posts: 352
|
I am a little bias, But I would take the supra...I love the way they look, they have enough power, I love the targa top...The 5.0 really is the best bang for the buck out of these..Supras cost a little more, and are a little slower, but I like the rest of the car so it makes up for that
|
|
|
|
|
DriverSide Home |
Service & Repair |
Car Prices |
Parts & Accessories |
Reviews & Advice |
My Garage
