viet_boiiiii

well i was just browsing in some honda rsx forums and saw this
does evo have its good and bad point? i know evo's have AWD/16g turbo and the bad point is that the front end is very fugly compared to the older evo's and it has a small fmic.

__________________
new 2006 Scion tC - 5spd
-magnaflow catback
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2088489
~~~R.I.P (7-2-05)~~~
1998 Eclipse Gst - 5 spd

ooralliartoo

evos fuckin own dont know what the hell that queer was talking about...civic hatch's suck...i had one

ooralliartoo

Goods - AWD, turbo
Bads - turbo lag

drdisque

bad - marginal build quality, rust problems, high insurance, premium gas, attract lots of attention from police, mitsu likes voiding thier warantees.

__________________
Dr. Disque - 2007 Mazda 6-S 5 Door

ooralliartoo

plus their expensive as hell...to the common folk ahaha

Automatic 51

i've never heard anyting about rust problems, but there are a fair share of downsides to the evo. all of with drdisque said and then; clutches usually go before 15k miles unless you granny the shit out of it, you have riced out hondas harassing you, (happened both times i was out with my friend is his evo).

but the upside is acceleration puches you into the seat, fantastic handling, more functional as an everyday car than most sport coupes (and it can out perform most of them too)

__________________
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer ES
5 speed

EvoCrazy

When you think about performance, and bang for buck, they are pretty cheap. They can match the performance of lots of more expensive cars, like Corvettes, and Stangs. That other guy was an idiot, and he can take his 91 Civic Hatch (if I drove that I wouldnt call other cars shitty) and stick it up his ass.....

__________________