I Was Told They Do But I Havent Been Able To Find One. If There Is Would Somebody Be Able To Tell Me Where I Could Get Such A Thing

never heard of a stroker kit for E engines. Sure it wasnt custom???

never heard of a stroker kit for E engines. Sure it wasnt custom???


I SWEAR I SEEN IT IN IMPORT TUNER MAG BUT I COULD BE WRONG

have you ever seen that Chris Rock Show where he's talking about the Anklet on the Fat chick. "Anklets holdin on for dear life like arrgg!!"

yeah...

because that will be what the rods are doing on a 2.6 KA at 6000RPM

boost>displacement :)

Boost is displacement. The KA does not need any more stroke. You are going to be looking at some serious bucks for something like that. Try calling some shops and companies such as Crower, phatka-t, boostdesigns, and basically any shop you can think of. Crower would be a good company to call because they are starting to take interest in the KA. Ivan at Phatka-t would also be someone to try. He is really smart, has some really good connections, and has some of the baddest cars in the US.

www.phatka-t.com
www.boostdesigns.com

huh? boost is displacement? and i always thought displacement was defined as the area from bdc to tdc, whereas boost was simply more efficiency out of the given displacement

Boost is air being forced through the engine. You are increasing the density of the air entering the engine so more air is being displaced. Think of it as building blocks. The air entering the engine while it is naturally asperated is like a unorganized pile of blocks. The air entering the engine via forced induction is like a pile of blocks stacked neatly. You can fit more neatly stacked blocks in a given area than you can unstacked blocks. Get it? More air is being dislplaced.

instead of air being sucked into the engine, its being pushed

I Was Told They Do But I Havent Been Able To Find One. If There Is Would Somebody Be Able To Tell Me Where I Could Get Such A Thing
its called chevy small block

i understand forced induction very well, however, air density does not define diplacement. therefore boost does not add displacement.

technically hes right, the numbers basiaclly used to determine displacement are stroke, bore, and # of cylinders....

all a turbocharger does is allow the engine to burn air more effectively, compensated with proper timing, and more fuel ... you get power

Look at it this way:

When you add 7psi to the intake manifold, you get a pressure ratio of 1.47. And after you go through all of the temp rise stuff, you get a density ratio of about 1.27. Now the KA with a guestimated VE of 80% flows 218.4CFM. Multiply that by 1.27 adn you get 277.7CFM. Divide that by 61.02 to convert to liters and you get 4.5l. So you are effectively flowing as much air as a 4.5l engine.

same shit guy, flowing more air doesnt raise displacement. by your logic a i/h/e setup would also raise displacement.

if you think about it in a not so literal sense, its true. at 101.3kPa, you have 2.4L of air right? well if you increase the pressure by 50% then you're getting one and a half times the air in the same area, which if it was put into a balloon, would expand to about 3.0L of air at 101.3kPa. i don't know if you got that but whoever did, you'll understand why nissanfanatic said 'more displacement'. displacement isn't just in cars, its the physical area that something takes up.

i dont see how I/H/E would raise displacement....the only thing that could support that is the intake getting more air to cyl, but the exhaust and header would help will flow and not "raise displacement".

thats not what his argument is.. he's saying "think of it this way" not THIS IS HOW IT IS

correct me if im wrong here but arent liters used to count volume and not mass?

yes. who said anything about mass?

Well since we measure volume with liters then its wrong to say that you can compress air and make your engine >2.4 liters.The air mass will rise but you still have to call it a 2.4l engine even if it performs alot better because the volume of air didnt change.

Yeah, they have them. Check out Jim Wolf Technology.
http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/

a turbocharger doesn't up your displacement, you just get denser air and you add with more fuel to compensate so you make power. By your logic, anything that adds power to a given engine is upping the displacement and thats just not true. I like the I/H/E analogy, it allows more air to enter the engine as well, and it will make more power, but it is most certainly not giving your more displacement, it is allowing what you already have to work more effeciently.

displacement is dependant on a totally different set of factors... if you don't believe me search the internet for one of many websites that will tell you how displacement is measured.

what really messed up this whole turbo adds displacement schebang was when F1 allowed turbo 4 bangers, they limmited their displacement to well under the N/A engines and people thought well hey its adding displacement so its equivelant to the N/A engines... thats not true at all. They gave them that limit so that they couldn't completely outgun the contrempary engines, if they let them run a 3 liter turbo v6 they would make a lot more power and make fools of the guys who were stuck witht he larger n/a engines... when you have f1 technology and money they really exploit the engines making sick HP figures back in those days. There is only so much you can do to a N/A motor before you run into a brick wall so to speak on your power output, with a turbo application your power is only limmited by the strength of your engine, the amount of fuel you can deliver, and cooling. I think they should let them run twin turbo v12's and get some more fatalities lol... atleast it would boil down to more driver skill that way since you could have more power then is useable on most parts of the track.

thats all there is to be said on this

I would just like to say this too all who are as confused as i, are u guys just pullin these numbers outa yur azz or what damn wish i knew what the hell u were tlakin bout, but i do kno how the turbo system works but displacement? u got me

Okay. If say an engine has a VE of 80%, then it is not flowing 2.4l of air. That is measured at the factory as how much the engine will physically displace in a controlled enviroment in two revolutions of the crankshaft. Now with a VE of 80%, the engine is flowing the equivalent of a 100%VE 1.9l engine. What is so hard to see about a turbocharger increasing the literal displacement of an engine? Yea it doesn't mean you can change the badge on the engine or anything, but I don't think you're going to outrun a 5.0l engine without moving close to the same amount of air. HP=engine flow. No way around it. Can't make power any other way. You can free up horsepower, which is what I/H/E and drivetrain mods do, but you won't make any more power otherwise. No I did not just pull the numbers out of my ass. I do a lot of reading. Sure liters are used to measure volume, but do you think that a pressurized soda bottle is holding exactly 2 liters of soda and air when you buy it? Put a balloon over the top of the bottle and open it. Then measure that amount of air and add it to the 2 liters and see how much air you have.

huh? boost is displacement? and i always thought displacement was defined as the area from bdc to tdc, whereas boost was simply more efficiency out of the given displacement Boost is intake effiecency produced by a turbo or supercharger, displacement is the amount of liters an engine has as defined by crankshaft stroke. Example ka24e is 2.4 liters, that means the crankshaft stroke is 2.4 inches. If you remove the engine head and spun number 1 cylinder to bdc and measured the distance from the mating surface to the top of the piston it would be 2.4 inches. Also there are stroker kits for the ka24e try IPP(import peformance parts) it is pricey at 2 Grand but with a CX Racing turbo the proper cam, Shaved heads to increase compression ratio, a good port and polish, the ka flows less than ideal on the exhaust ports, and large injectors to eliminate a lean condition the ka24e can produce insane horse power per cylinder. I have an early 89 S 13 and the cast block is perfect even if a bit heavy because they can take more abuse. I build engines for my toys, Chevy strokers etc. Be prepared for the cost it will be prohibitively expensive if you are unable to do the work yourself, a lager crank will simply not fit properly without modification to the block.