curtis73

Considering that we have Dusenberg, Skoda, Seat, Delorean, Panoz, Vector, McLaren, and TVR, Why on earth have AMC and IH been neglected? IH's light truck division made more vehicles than all of the eight above companies' cars COMBINED. AMC made even more.

I suggest we add AMC/Rambler/Nash and International Harvester forums.... And don't give me the answer of, "IH is covered under light trucks" excuse. That's like saying Dusenberg is covered under Classic Cars. If you're going to list vehicle brands/makes and include extremely obscure brands like Vector and Skoda, why not list the insanely common ones? Chances are not a single AF reader has a Vector, but I guarantee several of them have AMCs and IHs. I have one of each.

How 'bout it?

fredjacksonsan

Yeah, IH did make a whole lot of non-farm vehicles before they stopped production. There's a group called "The Binder Bunch" that adores IH trucks.

Andydg

Oh yeah I think we should have a IH area too, I was just looking for one like 2 weeks ago when I friend was asking me a bunch of questions about Scouts.

__________________

TheSilentChamber

I would like to see an deticated AMC forum, there is one stashed away in the muscle car forum but nobody knows its there.

2strokebloke

Maybe we could have an "orphan" section, and throw Studebaker, Hudson, Kaiser and REO in there too. But then we'd basically just end up with the "Other Cars" section that we already have.

__________________

Support America's dependence on foreign oil - drive an SUV!
"At Ford, job number one is quality. Job number two is making your car explode." - Norm McDonald.
If you find my signature offensive - feel free to get a sense of humor.

TheSilentChamber

AMC isnt an orphan, it was baught out by the anti-christ