|
Coolant Temp Sensor Replaced
After reading every related thread on this forum I decided to replace the CTS on my 96 3.1. I've been told that when one fails, the computer assumes a default of 32 degrees. This causes a rich mixture and reduces fuel economy slightly. It also causes the two fans to behave erratically.
Well, the strangest thing has happened. Upon turning the ignition on, the temp gauge pegs past the redline (stone cold engine) and is accompanied by the red "hot" light.
So I reset the ECM, let it go through its relearning process, and drove it around for a few days. Guy's, it's very scary to drive around with a temp gauge buried past the red. The condition has not improved.
--The radiator hoses get hot (thermostat/pump are okay)
--Thermostat is two years old
--The AC still activates the left fan (normal)
--Neither fan activates on its own any longer (not good)
--Unplugging the CTS causes both fans to activate and run continuously regardless of temperature
--The gauge remains pegged past the red (I have no way to know the coolant temperature)
--When I chicken out and turn on the AC to cool it back down, both fans come on for a while and then the right one shuts off
I understand from reading previous posts that the fans are operating normally. Personally, I think allowing an iron block/aluminum head combo to get over 200 is asking for the sort of gasket problems so common among these engines. I speak from experience here (lower intake victim two years ago). G.M. is entitled to their own opinion however.
Anyway, the fans no longer work normally and my temp gauge is all messed up. Both CTS’s gave identical resistance levels when tested with boiling and ice water in my kitchen. The old sensor can still be used in the car and every symptom goes away except the slightly lower fuel economy and less power. The engine seems to have a little more power with the new CTS (this could be in my head I suppose, if it is more, it’s minimal). I think the new sensor is bad but why does it bench test the same as the old one? Also, the positive lead to the sensor is only providing 4.2 volts when it’s supposed to be receiving 5.0 from the ECM. Is this close enough? If you think that’s the problem, what could be done to correct it and why would the symptoms disappear with the old CTS installed? If you have any other ideas I would sure be appreciative. Replacing the CTS did wonders for my Saturn (highway mpg went from 28 to 37).
I would also like to thank whoever came up with the idea of tilting the engine forward to replace the back three spark plugs. Pure genius.
|