Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Visit IgorSushko.com and see what it's like racing in Japan
-
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro > F-Bodies (Camaro and Firebird) > Camaro Discussions
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-22-2004, 09:21 AM   #1
cymru232
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Suburban, Maryland
Posts: 1
cymru232 Normal reputation
Question '79 Firebird

What would be the best octane to use in a '79 Firebird w/ a 403 engine? (it's an automatic, if that makes any difference) -- sorry guys, I'm really new to this :)
cymru232 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 11:26 AM   #2
73superduty
Lost in plastic
 
73superduty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lake Crystal, Minnesota
Posts: 932
73superduty Normal reputation
Send a message via AIM to 73superduty
Re: '79 Firebird

Using the highest octane would be best, but with that engine I think you'd be fine using whatever. With my collector cars I used highest grade and octane booster.
Chris
__________________



Check out my builds, model contests and more at my Fotki:
http://public.fotki.com/73superduty/
73superduty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2004, 09:01 PM   #3
Philo
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pine City, New York
Posts: 181
Philo Normal reputation
Re: '79 Firebird

Quote:
Originally Posted by cymru232
What would be the best octane to use in a '79 Firebird w/ a 403 engine? (it's an automatic, if that makes any difference) -- sorry guys, I'm really new to this
I have the '79 with a 400. Your manual should tell you the octane you need. The octane would probably be the same for both engines - the highest octane you can get at the pump (not Mobil's highest octane though probably unnecessary). BTW, all 403 engines were automatics and all 400 engines were four speeds in '79.
Philo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2004, 07:56 AM   #4
MrPbody
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 2,171
MrPbody Normal reputation
Philo,
Not "ALL" '79s with the 400 were 4-speeds. ALL WS6 cars were 400s. Many did have automatics. Look at the scoop. If it says "6.6 Litre", it's a 403. If it says "T/A 6.6", it's a Pontiac.
403s were designed to run on 87 octane, but we've found 89 works better. Using anything higher is a waste of money, and no gain. Too high an octane can actually hurt performance.

Jim
MrPbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2004, 09:16 AM   #5
Philo
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pine City, New York
Posts: 181
Philo Normal reputation
Re: '79 Firebird

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPbody
Philo,
Not "ALL" '79s with the 400 were 4-speeds. ALL WS6 cars were 400s. Many did have automatics. Look at the scoop. If it says "6.6 Litre", it's a 403. If it says "T/A 6.6", it's a Pontiac.
403s were designed to run on 87 octane, but we've found 89 works better. Using anything higher is a waste of money, and no gain. Too high an octane can actually hurt performance.

Jim

I have several sources of documentation that says all Pontiac blocks that went into '79 Firebirds (stamped "PWH", which were 400's), were four speeds. No automatics. And all Oldsmobile blocks with the 403's were automatics - no four speeds.

For example (Also supported by Pontiac Historical Services):
From: http://www.transamclub.com/july_news_002.html

"For 1979, the final year for the T/A 6.6 engine option, a total of 8,326 Trans Ams and 346 Formulas were produced, all with Borg Warner Super T-10 4-speed transmissions."

Last edited by Philo; 02-27-2004 at 12:25 PM.
Philo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2004, 05:09 PM   #6
94gpse
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: new baltimore, Michigan
Posts: 64
94gpse Normal reputation
I had a 78' Trans am with a 400 and I ran mid grade in it. Really you only need a higher octane if your car has high compression. Take for example the new mustang Cobra (I am not a mustang person this is just for example) they have about 10:1 compression so they have to run premium. In 79' a 400 had about 7.5:1 compression which isn't too much. I only ran mid because the car had a few miles on it. So If I were you I would regular or mid. Theres no point in wasting your money on premium if you don't need it.
94gpse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2004, 08:13 AM   #7
Philo
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pine City, New York
Posts: 181
Philo Normal reputation
Re: '79 Firebird

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94gpse
I had a 78' Trans am with a 400 and I ran mid grade in it. Really you only need a higher octane if your car has high compression. Take for example the new mustang Cobra (I am not a mustang person this is just for example) they have about 10:1 compression so they have to run premium. In 79' a 400 had about 7.5:1 compression which isn't too much. I only ran mid because the car had a few miles on it. So If I were you I would regular or mid. Theres no point in wasting your money on premium if you don't need it.
You are probably right. If you are a leadfoot though, I would still use a octane grade higher than 'regular', since 'pinging' that you cannot hear can cause damage to the engine. The '79 400 has 8.1 compression ratio, and the owners manual says to use 91 octane or better.
Philo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro > F-Bodies (Camaro and Firebird) > Camaro Discussions

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts