Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Become a fan of Igor Sushko on Facebook!
-
Please Register or Login to access: DriverSide DriverSide Home | Service & Repair | Car Prices | Parts & Accessories | Reviews & Advice | My Garage
Google  
Web AF
See Latest Posts
Access AF from your phone - point your mobile browser to http://m.automotiveforums.com
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro > F-Bodies (Camaro and Firebird) > Engine and Transmission
Engine and Transmission Discuss Engine, Transmission, and all other performance modifications here.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-01-2006, 09:56 PM   #31
FormulaLT1
Most Seniorest Mod EVER!
 
FormulaLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakewood, New Jersey
Posts: 7,507
FormulaLT1 Normal reputation
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: Rockers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by capriceowns
they also make a "tall" style valve cover exactly for this. Aftermarket only.

The name says it all there taller to clear 1.6 rockers. I have some chrome ones from holley paid 80$ for a pair, not that bad.
That may be a good option for 3rd gens but alot of times those tall valve covers don't work on LT1's without having to be modified because of the alternator lip on the passenger side (which is not a issue on vettes but like I said there valve covers are already clearanced for 1.6's)
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
FormulaLT1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 10:11 PM   #32
Whoaru99
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Central, Minnesota
Posts: 106
Whoaru99 Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by poormillionaire2
Wow, talk about weak cams. After looking at aftermarket cam specs, those factory cams seem as if they wouldn't even allow an engine to run. But I guess that seems right from the factory.

So, you should end up with about 480"/.490" of lift I/E respectively with 1.6 rockers. I still say go with a slightly more aggressive cam.
Well, they have a few more "little" things to worry about like warranty, emissions compliance, and overall customer satisfaction on what, a couple million vehicles each year?

Whereas you and I have only ourselves to contend with if we muck it up.

OTOH, the mileage and power they get from these engines is actually pretty amazing considering how things were in the mid 70s through mid-late 80s. It's a testament to how well properly matched components can perform considering what's in there for lift/duration.

Just imagine how well lots of engines could perform if more people actually matched parts rather than just trying to jam some big-assed cam into an otherwise stock rig that maybe has a cat-back system.
Whoaru99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 10:12 PM   #33
capriceowns
AF Regular
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: detriot, Michigan
Posts: 423
capriceowns Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
That may be a good option for 3rd gens but alot of times those tall valve covers don't work on LT1's without having to be modified because of the alternator lip on the passenger side (which is not a issue on vettes but like I said there valve covers are already clearanced for 1.6's)
I didnt know the LT1 had a clearnce problem with them. Learned something new, lol.

Ive only used them on Gen I SBC my knowledge is limited
__________________
1987 Chevrolet Caprice classic Brougham. 142,000 on the 305 and still chugging
capriceowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 10:15 PM   #34
Whoaru99
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Central, Minnesota
Posts: 106
Whoaru99 Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

Just be sure to change your oil and filter frequently until those pushrods wear clearance into the cylinder heads with those 1.6 rockers....
Whoaru99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2006, 11:03 PM   #35
97cavalier
AF Enthusiast
 
97cavalier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, Illinois
Posts: 2,868
97cavalier Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

i don't think they will rub (the push rods) they are like right at the limit.I just sent off for the cam, and i get payed tomarow so i will order the rockers next, then i think i will try to find some valve covers.
__________________
95 Z71 Silverado 4x4 ext. cab
Mods- Flowmaster Exhaust,Intake
97cavalier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 10:00 AM   #36
Nate355RS
AF Enthusiast
 
Nate355RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salem, Virginia
Posts: 635
Nate355RS Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

I'm just saying that the max lift for the stock valve guides is around .480", it could be lower like around .450"-.460" because there is some variation. It would be a good idea to double check your heads and make sure your not going to mess them up by running a net lift that's pushing the very limits of what a stock head might be able to handle. I really suggest you have the heads worked over first, or just get some 1.5 rockers. Your probably going to bend a few pushrods and break some rocker arms, but if it were me I would save the money spent on the 1.6s and put it toward gears and posi
__________________


'91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect...
Nate355RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 10:55 AM   #37
97cavalier
AF Enthusiast
 
97cavalier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, Illinois
Posts: 2,868
97cavalier Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

well the more i think about it, i think i will stay with 1.5 rockers. That is stock size right?
__________________
95 Z71 Silverado 4x4 ext. cab
Mods- Flowmaster Exhaust,Intake
97cavalier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2006, 11:01 AM   #38
Nate355RS
AF Enthusiast
 
Nate355RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Salem, Virginia
Posts: 635
Nate355RS Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

1.5 is stock. I think that's a good choice, it'll make it easier tuning I know that. You'll still get good power out of 1.5s, and if you want to step up to 1.6 and get a little head work done it won't be too hard and you'll have a pretty hot 305.
__________________


'91 RS, forged LT1, GTP heads, blower cam, AFR Hydra-Rev kit, ram air intake, SLP 1 3/4 headers and 3" y-pipe, 3" Dynomax exaust, Yank 2800 TT stall converter, Strange 3.73 gears with Zexel-Torsen LSD, ect, ect...
Nate355RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2006, 12:30 PM   #39
97cavalier
AF Enthusiast
 
97cavalier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Columbia, Illinois
Posts: 2,868
97cavalier Normal reputation
Re: Rockers?

thanx alot for all your guys help, with out you guys i would probly have a blown up 305,lol. thanx alot
__________________
95 Z71 Silverado 4x4 ext. cab
Mods- Flowmaster Exhaust,Intake
97cavalier is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Camaro > F-Bodies (Camaro and Firebird) > Engine and Transmission

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.

Google  
Web AF
Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
no new posts