Signature guidlines

PWRDbyUNCLEbens · 11-07-2005, 11:05 AM

At first I wasn't too mad about my jessica alba sig being deleted. I noticed the mod said not appropriate for an open forum.

I got to thinking though, and it started to bother me more, and more that my sig got deleted. Maybe someone can explain the rules of what can go into a sig. It's not even a nude pic.

I have a hard time believing this forum is so politically correct that it won't allow a sexy picture (not nude) to be in the sig. This PC is just ridiculous. Is it really going to hurt someone to see this pic.

Sincerely,
Open to Responses

jon@af · 11-07-2005, 12:03 PM

This website is open to persons 13 and up and there ARE members on here who ARE 13 and 14 and 15 and so on. While you yourself may not be offended or I may not be offended, we are looking after the best interest of this website as being a tasteful place. She is not completely nude, no. However, she is half naked in what are suggestive pictures. It is not something an employer would want to see on a subordinate's screen, nor is it something a mother would like to see on her childs screen.

While you may not agree with the decision, it is a decision that I myself had a hand in and would make over and over again. I'm a fan of beautiful women, but per the guidelines of this website, it is not appropriate.

PWRDbyUNCLEbens · 11-07-2005, 09:04 PM

Thank you for the reply. I was kind of thinking on the lines of the whole workplace enviroment situation. I can respect that Igor wants to keep this website as professional as possible even if it does mean regulating the members.

So I'm I to understand that woman in general are not exceptable or do they just have to be tasteful like per say this pic? Sorry for the large pics.

or

jon@af · 11-07-2005, 09:12 PM

The pics above would be fine as they are fully clothed and in good taste. So, no half-naked Jessica's thought clothed Jessica's=just fine (mighty fine I might add

)

PWRDbyUNCLEbens · 11-07-2005, 09:16 PM

Hooray! i was afraid you were going to shoot those down too

Thanks

samandiar · 11-10-2005, 09:00 PM

So why do the mods tolerate so much swearing? Heck, some of them swear themselves!

budweiserbeauty · 12-21-2005, 08:32 PM

and i got one for ya
why do the mods help other members create sigs that mis-represent them by putting a picture of a car that belongs to someone else in the post???

kinda ILLEGAL isnt it.

l_eclipse_l · 12-22-2005, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budweiserbeauty

and i got one for ya
why do the mods help other members create sigs that mis-represent them by putting a picture of a car that belongs to someone else in the post???

kinda ILLEGAL isnt it.

What exactly are you talking about?

jon@af · 12-22-2005, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by budweiserbeauty

and i got one for ya
why do the mods help other members create sigs that mis-represent them by putting a picture of a car that belongs to someone else in the post???

kinda ILLEGAL isnt it.

Unless that signature has a copyright that you can prove, it is merely an issue that is between you and that person. If you have a problem with this person, let them know, but do not start things like this in an open forum.

So, in response, no, it's not illegal. No copyright laws were broken. We are dealing with the situation through the site administrator as we speak, so instead of continuing your disgruntled posting, please wait patiently while the situation is handled. Your message to the administrator was enough and is being dealt with accordingly. Good day.

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD