08-07-2005, 02:33 PM
|
#16
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smyrna, Georgia
Posts: 2,383
|
Re: Re: 2006 body style
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jeverett
I agree with the tall body panels, that is rediculous. But since 99 Chevy has made all the trucks the same height. I personally think the 4x4's should sit a bit higher than the 2wd's. when I bought mine I was dissapointed b/c if how much lower it sat than my old 89 F-150. Sure it rides better, but if you buy a 4x4 you shouldnt be looking to have a cadillac ride.
|
I think GM did that for a very good reason: safety. The higher the center of gravity on these trucks, the more likely they are to have more of a rollover problem.
__________________
  
"When I step on the gas, I want people to think the world is coming to an end!" - Homer Simpson
2002 ECSB, Nelson Tune, LS1 electric fans, 145A alternator, K&N FIPK, 160º T-stat, TB coolant bypass, Corvette servo, 4 headlight mod, blue LED gauge cluster
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 08:34 AM
|
#17
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Maryville, Missouri
Posts: 326
|
I don't want to see them raise the height of their trucks, too hard for women to get in and out of and also too hard to load child seats.
You younger guys will find out someday.
I also don't know why GM doesn't approach like say.....Caterpiller for a diesel engine. At first they had those crappy converted 350s and 6.2Ls them went to the 6.5L, which wasn't much better, and now their big dog is built by Isuzu???
At the chance of getting tossed out on my a**, I'll tell you in my opinion the only diesel on the light truck market is the Cummins. You can rant and rave all you want, but think about it. Cummins has been building light and dependable diesel engines for a lot longer than any of their competitors and it has hardly has any complaints. I'm not a Dodge guy in the slightest, but I wish GM would build a decent diesel engine.
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 10:39 AM
|
#18
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Preston, Georgia
Posts: 2,154
|
Re: 2006 body style
Maybe they wont change anything and then everybody who likes the height of the truck can stay happy. I'll just lift mine if I want it higher
__________________
1998 ECSB Z71
Whelen LED's
Kenwood 2-way
"BIG 3"
2500+ watt audio
|
|
|
08-09-2005, 11:13 AM
|
#19
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Smyrna, Georgia
Posts: 2,383
|
Re: 2006 body style
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by slacker_53
I don't want to see them raise the height of their trucks, too hard for women to get in and out of and also too hard to load child seats.
You younger guys will find out someday.
I also don't know why GM doesn't approach like say.....Caterpiller for a diesel engine. At first they had those crappy converted 350s and 6.2Ls them went to the 6.5L, which wasn't much better, and now their big dog is built by Isuzu???
At the chance of getting tossed out on my a**, I'll tell you in my opinion the only diesel on the light truck market is the Cummins. You can rant and rave all you want, but think about it. Cummins has been building light and dependable diesel engines for a lot longer than any of their competitors and it has hardly has any complaints. I'm not a Dodge guy in the slightest, but I wish GM would build a decent diesel engine.
|
Yeah... see those nerf bars on my truck? Wouldn't be there if it weren't for my wife. However, I'm pretty sure Ford has been producing a diesel at least almost as long as Cummins. I know my dad has owned several 50's model Ford tractors that had Ford diesels in them.
__________________
  
"When I step on the gas, I want people to think the world is coming to an end!" - Homer Simpson
2002 ECSB, Nelson Tune, LS1 electric fans, 145A alternator, K&N FIPK, 160º T-stat, TB coolant bypass, Corvette servo, 4 headlight mod, blue LED gauge cluster
|
|
|
|