03-02-2005, 06:27 PM
|
#16
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
another ? is, if i swap a 2.2l rear for my 4.3 rear, can i keep the posi and get more power from the lower geard rearend?
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 06:30 PM
|
#17
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 145
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
At least back to 94 and newer are limited to 100mph.
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 06:55 PM
|
#18
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
96 was when it was mandated all vehicals by federal law, an hence the birth of OBDII (more then a speed limiter was installed so please no one point it out, it was an emissions thing)
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 07:04 PM
|
#19
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Shellsburg, Iowa
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dmbrisket 51
another ? is, if i swap a 2.2l rear for my 4.3 rear, can i keep the posi and get more power from the lower geard rearend?
|
If the ring&pinion can be swapped, or if the posi carrier can be put in the 2.2L, then yes.
__________________
'04 Cavalier coupe M/T 2.2 Ecotec
Supercharged 14 PSI boost, charge air cooler, 42# injectors
Tuned with HP Tuners
When you buy something... a bottle of pop for example, who gets the profit from it and what do they do with it? Maybe your money's going to groups that want to hurt you. I think everyone should do a search for things they purchase regularly "____ supports". Might just find a company you won't buy stuff from anymore.
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 07:17 PM
|
#20
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
and this will give me excellent low end and slower at the top end correct?
|
|
|
03-02-2005, 07:59 PM
|
#21
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Shellsburg, Iowa
Posts: 2,974
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
I'm not sure if they nescessarily have different gear ratios, but if the 2.2 is a lower ratio, then you are correct.
__________________
'04 Cavalier coupe M/T 2.2 Ecotec
Supercharged 14 PSI boost, charge air cooler, 42# injectors
Tuned with HP Tuners
When you buy something... a bottle of pop for example, who gets the profit from it and what do they do with it? Maybe your money's going to groups that want to hurt you. I think everyone should do a search for things they purchase regularly "____ supports". Might just find a company you won't buy stuff from anymore.
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 09:09 AM
|
#22
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: bay city, Michigan
Posts: 230
|
GM light duty trucks came with different transfer cases for the different engines and gear ratios
they are :
new process 205
new process 241
new process 231
borg warner 1370
my 89 s-10 has the 231 with 4.3, 700r4 trans, and gu 6 axles, my buddies 89 s-15 has a 4.3, 700r4 trans, gu 5 axles and 241 transfer
he put the 231 transfer in and lost speed, gm service told him the the gearing in the transfer case isn't geared for the gu 5 axles it's geared for the gu 6 axles
|
|
|
03-03-2005, 01:34 PM
|
#23
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tifton, Georgia
Posts: 195
|
Re: Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by J-Ri
I've got a 93 4.3L, it will go pretty damn fast. I was cruising down the highway well over the top of the spedometer. When I let off the gas, it took 10-15 seconds to coast down to 85. Those of you that can't go over a specific speed either have an exhaust restriction or a clogged intake.
|
Is there an easy way to tell if that's the problem? Also, could a dirty fuel filter cause the engine to have to push harder at higher speeds? (I want to get good gas mileage should I ever get on the interstate).
|
|
|
03-06-2005, 05:07 PM
|
#24
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 180
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry80871852
Please remember the smaller V-6's do not have the power of the 4.3, so if the power is not there it will not do as your 4.3 does nor mine 92 S-10 Blazer with the Votec 4.3.
Also had a 1985 full size Chevy pickup, with the 4.3 and a 4 barrel carb., it did not have the power to pass someone on the open highway, but when you kept your foot in it, it consumed much gas, but it would not reach 90 MPH, to much truck and wind resitance for this motor.
The 4 barrel sound good when you steped into it, but the result of stepping into it were not much.
|
Correct I guess because my '83 s10blazer 4x4 2.8 carb will not stay in overdrive with any upgrade or attempt to speed up much when cruising at decent rpm around 60 mph. otherwise rpms gets high and temp starts to climb. in my opninion 2.8 poor choice for lot of highway use but fine for a little with reasonable speeds. think of it as the gas saving city s10 and the 4.3 the country powerhorse highway passer. pushing a 2.8 hard on highway a lot in my opinion will cause greatly accelerated wear on engine and tranny. be light on the gas pedal and patient with traffic and it will last ;-) keeping it in overdrive saves expensive gas and repairs.
|
|
|
04-07-2005, 11:24 PM
|
#25
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: d, Kentucky
Posts: 3
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
got a 1990 blazer with many boltons. The truck seems to beg for a higher gear. Was told I had the heavy duty axles withe 3.55 gearing. Think I need a 3.73 and it IS 4wd.
Where can I find a writeup on changing these two gears???
|
|
|
04-08-2005, 08:05 AM
|
#26
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sarnia
Posts: 1,116
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
In 1987, the S10 line of vehicules had electronic fuel controls (TBI, fuel injection, etc.) and computers. Maybe there is a rev limter or speed limit setting in the computer.
Could this be a possibility? I would go to a dealership and ask the maintence shop guys the question.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lamehonda
AF has ruined my life. .... Thanks AF 
|
|
|
|
04-08-2005, 09:27 AM
|
#27
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lenexa, Kansas
Posts: 226
|
Re: Re: Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
I have a 97 2.2L 2X4 and its top end is at 95. Something is different from mine. Couldnt tell ya tho
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 12:20 AM
|
#28
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: d, Kentucky
Posts: 3
|
may be a 3.42. Seen this 4.3 go 114 mph on the freeway...Thats with the digital dash. Got out of it cause got nervous
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 01:18 PM
|
#29
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tifton, Georgia
Posts: 195
|
Re: Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NaKeDZX
At least back to 94 and newer are limited to 100mph.
|
What is it that keeps a newer vehicle from going faster than 100 mph? Is it a governor of some sort? Can it be taken off so that the truck will go over 100mph?
[I know with school buses, the governors only allow the bus to travel at 65mph (some only 55 or 60  ), but I've heard of the busdrivers removing them so that they could do about 80 if they had to get on the interstate  ].
|
|
|
04-09-2005, 03:58 PM
|
#30
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Muskegon, Michigan
Posts: 2,835
|
Re: Are older S10s geared lower?
its done by computer through the wheel speed sencor (wss) and the only way around it is to reprogram it, you can disable the sencor, but that is odomiter fraud, because the cluster quits working, your speedo doesnt work and you would quit racken up the miles
|
|
|
|