Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Become a fan of Igor Sushko - Racecar Driver
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Jaguar > XJ220
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2001, 11:52 PM   #1
enzo@af
Old Mod
 
enzo@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to enzo@af Send a message via AIM to enzo@af


I just love this picture, and the car.

Top speed 217 mph
0 - 60 in 3.8 sec
1/4 mi 11.7 @ 125mph
Horsepower 542 bhp @ 7200 rpm
Engine: 3.5 litre, Twin turbo V6 aluminium alloy cylinder heads and block.
Two overhead camshafts per bank, 4 valves per cylinder.
Curb weight 3025 lb

Prior to the McLaren's introduction this was the world's fastest production car.



__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari"
enzo@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2001, 08:15 AM   #2
autofan
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
nice...
But, I dunno, it just doesn't feel right looking at it. I can't imagine myself or anyone else driving it, if someone purchases an XJ220, they will just race with them. But yeah, it does look very powerful, strong, like a Jaguar.
autofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2001, 03:46 PM   #3
enzo@af
Old Mod
Thread starter
 
enzo@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to enzo@af Send a message via AIM to enzo@af
Wait...It doesn't look right? Are you smoking? That thing is gorgeous! Well, that's opinion, I guess.

__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari"
enzo@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2001, 02:19 AM   #4
LostBoyScout
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seen that pic many-a-times, still like seein it

The XJ220 is one of the most under-appreciated cars, or so it seems.. oh well, nice though
__________________
Jason | PSIvento
LostBoyScout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2001, 02:29 AM   #5
JD@af
Missing in action
 
JD@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 2,954
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via ICQ to JD@af Send a message via AIM to JD@af
Arrow Nice pic enzo

Yeah that was an artful photographing achievement capturing that Jag at such a picturesque moment. And I had no idea the XJ220's were that fast.

Is that number correct, 3.5 liters? Not to doubt you (or stats listed on supercars.net), just curious; the block looks too big to have that such a small displacement in the engineering plan view.. and in fact, I'd say from what I can see, it looks like either an inline 6 or a V12.. or maybe I'm the one whose smoking
JD@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2001, 03:14 AM   #6
enzo@af
Old Mod
Thread starter
 
enzo@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to enzo@af Send a message via AIM to enzo@af
Well, I have known Supercars.com to sometimes make either typo errors or simply post false info, so I searched a little more. I had always thought it to be a V6, so I didn't doubt it.

My findings:
according to these two sites,
http://www.supercarcentral.com/cars/...j220/stats.htm
http://www.rapidcars.com/xj220specs.html
it is a V6, and if you convert the cubic inches on the latter, it works out to 3.5 litres (213.4 cu in).

Those throttle bodies do give a false impression, and the only recourse I can offer is this...Originally, in '88 when this was still a concept, the car featured a TT V12. However, Jaguar later opted for the lighter TT V6. So, perhaps this drawing is of the previous engine...thus, the block size and those 6 pairs of Throttle bodies would not belong to the V6. I tried to find better pics of the engine on the net, but to no avail.
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari"
enzo@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2001, 06:37 PM   #7
NissanZ@af
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to NissanZ@af
There are a lot of pictures and stats about the XJ220 at my other site, XJ220 Central. The url is http://www.xj220central.com if you wanna check it out.
__________________
Nissan Z.net
NissanZ@af is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2001, 04:12 AM   #8
BBD
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: non, Kentucky
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BBD
One more thing about this car ,,,, its Junk if you ask me Jaguar thought they had it all,,, but it keeps breaking downlike crazy and not reliable ,, this car is droped the price of the Porche, & Ferrari F40 price tags.. however they soon found out it wasnt any good and the prices of both those cars went up like crazy in other words almost Pricless,,,, Jags are no good.
BBD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2001, 09:02 AM   #9
Chris
Oldie
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,805
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris Send a message via MSN to Chris
It is good, but I wouldn't buy it. I would take the McLaren F1, but for 250 grand (the current selling price, and some are still new, no-one bought them!) they aren't bad.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!!
MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2001, 11:47 PM   #10
psycovette
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It is a Twin Turbo V6.

__________________
99 C5 Vette Hardtop
67 E-Type' OTS
78 280 Z
62 Mk 10(GrandFather to the XJ8)
96 Saturn SL-2
psycovette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2001, 12:57 PM   #11
vectorclub
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
One more thing about this car ,,,, its Junk if you ask me Jaguar thought they had it all,,, but it keeps breaking downlike crazy and not reliable ,, this car is droped the price of the Porche, & Ferrari F40 price tags.. however they soon found out it wasnt any good and the prices of both those cars went up like crazy in other words almost Pricless,,,, Jags are no good
Jaguars are far from junk. The XJ220 is as a god as anything built at the time. High perfromance super cars all have issues. Even the Porsche 991 turbos have issues. WHile I don't have the funds to own these cars I know many who do. They all say exotic cars have exotic car problems. This applies to Lambos, ferraris, Porsches, and so on.

Jaguar under Ford's ownership has pushed the level of quality to levels equal with Lexus and BMW.

The XJ220 is one the best looking super cars of all time. If the XJ220 project would have been done under Ford's ownership, thus Ford's money it may have become a better car then the McLaren F1.

The one Jag XJ220 owner I know in Michigan loves his Jag.

The XJ220 is a great looking car that stands out from the rest of the super cars. In terms of looks alone the XJ220 is one of the best looking super cars of all time.
vectorclub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2001, 02:55 PM   #12
Chris
Oldie
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,805
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris Send a message via MSN to Chris
So 3 or more americans own XJ220's now? At one time, only Gates and Mike Tyson had one.
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!!
MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 01:57 AM   #13
vectorclub
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There are a dozen XJ220s in America now thanks to the new import loop holes. The feds are allowing cars for "show" to be brought in. Many cars that were once banned can apply to be brought in. Before long I would guess 50 or more XJ220s will be here.
vectorclub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 01:52 PM   #14
Chris
Oldie
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,805
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Chris Send a message via MSN to Chris
Good ol' show and display clause! (2500 miles a year!)
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!!
MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2002, 01:57 PM   #15
jsb88
AF Enthusiast
 
jsb88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unhappy

That show and display rule to get a Jaguar in is really rubbish...


But I am in england so I am ok!!!
jsb88 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD


Bookmarks
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Jaguar > XJ220

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by Searchlight © 2014 Axivo Inc.
 
no new posts