Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
01-05-2004, 04:57 PM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
4.6L vs 5.0L
Im looking to buy a 94-95 gt or a 96-98 gt, and I was wondering which engine or car would be better. hp, torq, mods, and life. anything else would be very helpful. Thx!!!
|
|
01-05-2004, 05:13 PM | #2 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
Quote:
Get the 94-95 gt because it has the 5.0! the 5.0 is way easier to add mods to and it reacts alot better then the 4.6 in my oppinion. the hp and torque are the same 94-97 215 hp and 285 torq.1998 has 225 hp. |
||
01-06-2004, 02:24 AM | #3 | |
Stang Guy
|
5.0 if you want to mod it. A lot cheaper and still more parts available. Plus non-PI 4.6's are dogs.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people... |
|
01-06-2004, 07:36 AM | #4 | ||
Stanger
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
Quote:
__________________
[size=1]-1950 Ford Custom, flathead V8
-2013 Ford Flex -1999 Ford F150 |
||
01-06-2004, 08:02 AM | #5 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
thx!!! 5.0 it is
|
|
01-06-2004, 08:26 AM | #6 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SF, California
Posts: 569
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
screw that, don't listen to these guys.
go with a v6!! or even better, an old 4cyl!!!
__________________
Mustangs are nice, but I'd rather have one of these... |
|
01-07-2004, 11:31 AM | #7 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LHC, Arizona
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Man that 4.6l is one hell of an engine but Ford really screwed it up bad. You cant beat a Y-block with cross bolted mains.
|
|
01-08-2004, 02:23 AM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
y block with cross bolted mains??? please explain
|
|
01-08-2004, 03:14 AM | #9 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
old, fox-body 'stang, 4-banger. tear the engine out and drop in a 351W. then own all the guys who told you to drop in a 5.0
__________________
-Andy '89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend. '86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it. "Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will." -Yoda teaches english class. |
|
01-08-2004, 12:00 PM | #10 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
change engine mounts and stuff like that for the windsor? change transmission im sure, what would u recomend?
|
|
01-08-2004, 12:01 PM | #11 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
also, which gears would be best, i need a tiny bit of gas mileage, dont want no 5mpg
|
|
01-08-2004, 01:42 PM | #12 | |
AF Regular
|
The 5.0 will be easier/cheaper to mod and have more power(unless you do a PI head swap). Just get some '96-98 tail lights unless you like the '94-95. For gears, I would say 3.55s are a good compromise between acceleration and streetability and are also what I plan to get. Since the car would likely have 2.73s stock, you will definitely feel an improvement. 3.73s will only put you 150-200rpm higher at highway speed than 3.55s, but that can make a big difference.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar. 1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc. '95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more. |
|
01-08-2004, 04:26 PM | #13 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
the only difference between a 302 and a Windsor is a .300 inch higher deck. so you shoudl be able to use 302 mounts. not sure on that. but, the tranny will bolt right up. just make sure that it's rated for the amount of power you plan to stick behind it. and, i don't believe that it's any harder to find parts for a windsor than for a 302. still, whatever you want, go for it.
__________________
-Andy '89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend. '86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it. "Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will." -Yoda teaches english class. |
|
01-08-2004, 08:21 PM | #14 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
Well I would get a 5.0 because its generally easier to make faster. A 96-98 4.6 is going to be a little bit more difficult but if you swap the heads, cams, and the intake from a 99+ you should easily be putting down over 240 rwhp. Theres some with basic bolt ons and P&P PI Heads putting down around 250 to the wheels!
Only downside is the compression would be too high, around 10.2:1, that I wouldnt advice on adding Forced Induction.
__________________
Give this place a try, You wont regret it! |
|
01-09-2004, 12:20 AM | #15 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L
Quote:
Also, the 351W has a deck height that is either 1" taller than a 302 or 1.3", depending on the year. 302 is 8.2" while the 351W is either 9.2" or 9.5". This significant height difference can cause interference between the stock hood and intake, at least on a Fox3. Only solution is dropped mounts(doesnt always work) or a cowl hood. Anyway, a 351W uses the same engine mounts and transmission pattern as a regular 302. And yes, parts are just as easy to find for 351Ws as any smallblock Ford.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar. 1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc. '95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more. |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|