Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2004, 04:57 PM   #1
fordforlife
AF Enthusiast
 
fordforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Question 4.6L vs 5.0L

Im looking to buy a 94-95 gt or a 96-98 gt, and I was wondering which engine or car would be better. hp, torq, mods, and life. anything else would be very helpful. Thx!!!
fordforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2004, 05:13 PM   #2
super GT
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordforlife
Im looking to buy a 94-95 gt or a 96-98 gt, and I was wondering which engine or car would be better. hp, torq, mods, and life. anything else would be very helpful. Thx!!!

Get the 94-95 gt because it has the 5.0!
the 5.0 is way easier to add mods to and it reacts alot better then the 4.6 in my oppinion.
the hp and torque are the same 94-97 215 hp and 285 torq.1998 has 225 hp.
super GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 02:24 AM   #3
GTStang
Stang Guy
 
GTStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
5.0 if you want to mod it. A lot cheaper and still more parts available. Plus non-PI 4.6's are dogs.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

GTStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 07:36 AM   #4
HiFlow5 0
Stanger
 
HiFlow5 0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hampden, Massachusetts
Posts: 3,171
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Send a message via AIM to HiFlow5 0
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTStang
5.0 if you want to mod it. A lot cheaper and still more parts available. Plus non-PI 4.6's are dogs.
Ain't that the truth! Them first gen 4.6's were shit! Definitly go 5oh!
__________________
[size=1]-1950 Ford Custom, flathead V8
-2013 Ford Flex
-1999 Ford F150

HiFlow5 0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 08:02 AM   #5
fordforlife
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
fordforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

thx!!! 5.0 it is
fordforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2004, 08:26 AM   #6
MustangRoadRacer
AF Enthusiast
 
MustangRoadRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SF, California
Posts: 569
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

screw that, don't listen to these guys.
go with a v6!!
or even better, an old 4cyl!!!
__________________
Mustangs are nice, but I'd rather have one of these...
MustangRoadRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2004, 11:31 AM   #7
The Dude
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LHC, Arizona
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Man that 4.6l is one hell of an engine but Ford really screwed it up bad. You cant beat a Y-block with cross bolted mains.
The Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 02:23 AM   #8
fordforlife
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
fordforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
y block with cross bolted mains??? please explain
fordforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 03:14 AM   #9
StangNut86
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
old, fox-body 'stang, 4-banger. tear the engine out and drop in a 351W. then own all the guys who told you to drop in a 5.0
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
StangNut86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 12:00 PM   #10
fordforlife
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
fordforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
change engine mounts and stuff like that for the windsor? change transmission im sure, what would u recomend?
fordforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 12:01 PM   #11
fordforlife
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
fordforlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

also, which gears would be best, i need a tiny bit of gas mileage, dont want no 5mpg
fordforlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 01:42 PM   #12
speedfreak
AF Regular
 
speedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Antlope Valley, California
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to speedfreak Send a message via MSN to speedfreak
The 5.0 will be easier/cheaper to mod and have more power(unless you do a PI head swap). Just get some '96-98 tail lights unless you like the '94-95. For gears, I would say 3.55s are a good compromise between acceleration and streetability and are also what I plan to get. Since the car would likely have 2.73s stock, you will definitely feel an improvement. 3.73s will only put you 150-200rpm higher at highway speed than 3.55s, but that can make a big difference.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar.
1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc.
'95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more.
speedfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 04:26 PM   #13
StangNut86
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
the only difference between a 302 and a Windsor is a .300 inch higher deck. so you shoudl be able to use 302 mounts. not sure on that. but, the tranny will bolt right up. just make sure that it's rated for the amount of power you plan to stick behind it. and, i don't believe that it's any harder to find parts for a windsor than for a 302. still, whatever you want, go for it.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
StangNut86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 08:21 PM   #14
DkShadow
AF Enthusiast
 
DkShadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

Well I would get a 5.0 because its generally easier to make faster. A 96-98 4.6 is going to be a little bit more difficult but if you swap the heads, cams, and the intake from a 99+ you should easily be putting down over 240 rwhp. Theres some with basic bolt ons and P&P PI Heads putting down around 250 to the wheels!

Only downside is the compression would be too high, around 10.2:1, that I wouldnt advice on adding Forced Induction.
DkShadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 12:20 AM   #15
speedfreak
AF Regular
 
speedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Antlope Valley, California
Posts: 193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to speedfreak Send a message via MSN to speedfreak
Re: 4.6L vs 5.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangNut86
the only difference between a 302 and a Windsor is a .300 inch higher deck. so you shoudl be able to use 302 mounts. not sure on that. but, the tranny will bolt right up. just make sure that it's rated for the amount of power you plan to stick behind it. and, i don't believe that it's any harder to find parts for a windsor than for a 302. still, whatever you want, go for it.
If you want to split hairs, the 302 is a Windsor too, as well as the 221, 260, and 289 (and the misfit 255 of the early '80s). The only reason a 351 Windsor is called a Windsor is so people know you arent talking about a 351 Cleveland or 351M.

Also, the 351W has a deck height that is either 1" taller than a 302 or 1.3", depending on the year. 302 is 8.2" while the 351W is either 9.2" or 9.5". This significant height difference can cause interference between the stock hood and intake, at least on a Fox3. Only solution is dropped mounts(doesnt always work) or a cowl hood.

Anyway, a 351W uses the same engine mounts and transmission pattern as a regular 302. And yes, parts are just as easy to find for 351Ws as any smallblock Ford.
__________________
1968 Mustang notchback Roller 302, Edelbrocks, Hookers, side-exits, RRs, Crane 2031, Duraspark, forged slugs, X-Celerator, 650DP, Fidanza FW, RAM clutch, Toploader, Comp Plus, McLeod bell, 15x7s, 1 1/8 swaybar.
1972 Ford Pinto SVO 2.3 turbo, MegaSquirt, T5, 8", etc.
'95 Honda XR600-10.5:1, 628cc, ported head, & more.
speedfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts