| Cars we drive what car do you own? We want to know! |
03-30-2003, 07:02 PM
|
#106
|
|
Freakin Sweeeeet!!
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 2,658
|
91 Chevy Caprice L05 350ci Powered [Auto] w/ I/H/E , Posi, Chipped ECU, etc....
1/4 Mile = 15.53 (Hot Day, Had A/C Running, Poor Reaction time [.983], could have done slightly better. The car is just too friggin heavy tho)
Top Speed = Speedometer only reads to 160 km/h. Buried it many times. No Idea on actual top speed.
HP = Dyno'd at 306.4 about 2 yrs ago. That was before some of the mods. Probably about 20 more hp now.
92 Nissan Sentra Classic 5spd / E16i Powered
1/4 Mile = Probably around 19sec
Top Speed = 160 km/h (took a long time to get there)
HP = 70 (When new)
Pathetic
__________________
Daily Driver
91 VW Jetta 1.6L IDI Turbo Diesel
17psi Boost
305,000kms and counting
My budget Drift Machine 
90 Dodge Ram 50
4G64 - 5spd.
Turbo / Intercooler
|
|
|
04-02-2003, 02:14 PM
|
#107
|
|
In Stereo where available
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: next to a ditch, Colorado
Posts: 4,478
|
1969 Subaru 360
1/4 mile: 22.3 seconds @ around 45-50 mph
Top speed: 70mph
HP: 25@5500rpm, 1.19hp per cubic inch, 356cc displacement.
Mods? I did a conversion from generator to alternator.
__________________
Support America's dependence on foreign oil - drive an SUV!
"At Ford, job number one is quality. Job number two is making your car explode." - Norm McDonald.
If you find my signature offensive - feel free to get a sense of humor.
|
|
|
04-07-2003, 09:27 AM
|
#108
|
|
CFA
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,526
|
Wow… I bet you need slicks to put all that power down!
|
|
|
04-17-2003, 03:28 AM
|
#109
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Surabaya
Posts: 152
|
Main car:
BMW 735iL
3500 cc (3.5 lt) V8 235 HP Steptronic
0-100kmh (62,5 mph) = 8.4 seconds
Top Speed = 240 kmh
Second car: (just gone)
Toyota Corolla
1600 cc (1.6 lt) 4 Valve Twincam = 115 HP Manual trans
Standard: 0-100kmh =about 11 second
1/4 Mile = about 17 high
After Mod: 0-100 kmh = 8.67 seconds (test with G-Tech)
1/4 mile = 16.8 seconds (test with G-Tech)
Top Speed about 200 kmh
Wait for the new car
|
|
|
04-25-2003, 09:11 AM
|
#110
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lima, Ohio
Posts: 61
|
1991 Mustang GT convertible
1/4 Mile-Never done it...guessing mid 14's?
Top speed- Speedo goes to 140 but it goes faster than that. I've heard high 140's.
Horsepower- Stock=225 +K&N and removed air silencer+Flowmasters 40-series+Off-road H-pipe=245?
__________________
1991 Mustang GT vert...1 5/8 shorty headers, offroad h-pipe, flowmaster mufflers, CAI, ported and polished lower manifold, 3.73's, Tremec 3550, King Cobra clutch, Pro 5.0 shifter, electric fan, subframe connectors, Lakewood upper control arms....A LOT more to come.....if only money grew on trees...14.2@95 mph 221 rwhp and 278 rwtq
|
|
|
04-25-2003, 04:41 PM
|
#111
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 541
|
1992 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (heavilly modded)
1/4 mile:best was 11.98
top speed: somewhere around 180. never really was able to try
hp:est. 325???
__________________
 Done: 1969 Baldwin Camaro
|
|
|
04-27-2003, 12:59 PM
|
#112
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 2,838
|
Quote:
Originally posted by grandprix92
1992 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (heavilly modded)
1/4 mile:best was 11.98
top speed: somewhere around 180. never really was able to try
hp:est. 325???
|
What mods you have done to that? Sounds quick.
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo.
|
|
|
04-27-2003, 04:23 PM
|
#113
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 541
|
K&N air filter, borla exaust, came supercharged already, lost weight, made the car lose weight (ripping out the back seats) lowered it for aerodynamics, and a little nitrous doesnt hurt
__________________
 Done: 1969 Baldwin Camaro
|
|
|
04-27-2003, 08:07 PM
|
#114
|
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 2,838
|
Quote:
Originally posted by grandprix92
K&N air filter, borla exaust, came supercharged already, lost weight, made the car lose weight (ripping out the back seats) lowered it for aerodynamics, and a little nitrous doesnt hurt
|
Ha, true. What size shot were you running? And how much does one of those weigh stock anyways? You know offhand?
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo.
|
|
|
04-27-2003, 10:06 PM
|
#115
|
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 541
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Self
Ha, true. What size shot were you running? And how much does one of those weigh stock anyways? You know offhand?
|
well, to be honest, i know nothing about nitrous so i had my friends set it up for me (big import guy. knows everything about nos and such). and i think they weigh just a little over 3K stock. not all that sure.
__________________
 Done: 1969 Baldwin Camaro
|
|
|
07-20-2003, 06:44 PM
|
#116
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: none, Idaho
Posts: 1
|
OK, this thread got posted over in Clubgp.com's forums and I felt I needed to come over here and call bullshit on that GP owner. I'm not going to claim I know everything or some shit. But what he said is a bunch of crap. 92 Grand Prix SE? That car came with a 3.1L or a 3.4 engine. NATURALLY ASPIRATED. Stock that car ran 17-18 seconds in the 1/4 mile? Over at ClubGP there are roughly 5 cars that are running under 12 seconds in the 1/4 mile. All are pushing more than 425hp out of their engines that DID come stock with a supercharger. One has switched from S/C to a Turbo setup and is running 10.9s in the 1/4, others have modified their M90s, while others have even switched to larger Mp112 blowers. And most all of them have lightened their cars.
So yeah...
Ok, I'll post up my specs on my car.
1999 Grand Prix GT, naturally Aspirated.
3.8L V-6
Race weight of 3650
Mods during last track time was Open Cone Intake, 3" downpipe, 3" high flow cat, 2.5" to factory Y pipe. On 17" Enkeis and Race Gas.
Best run was 15.098 @91.18 MPH. Cut a 2.15 60 foot time.
Added mods to date, 1.85/1.80 rockers, PnP'd Throttle body, Thrasher CAI, U/D WaterPump Pulley, O/D Alt pulley. And a DHP PCM. My best guess for 1/4 times now is 14.6 on a good day.
came stock with 200hp and 200ft/lbs of torque. Figure i am at about 220-240 hp right now. No idea. Never Dynoed.
Take It For What It's Worth
__________________
|
|
|
07-20-2003, 07:16 PM
|
#117
|
|
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 87
|
shenanigans!! shenanigans!!!
__________________
1999 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (2dr)
"Gold" Package
~drop in K&N
~3.4" pulley
~drilled 180º T-Stat
~Casper's cooling fan switch
~U-bend/Resonator removed
Best 1/4: 13.58 @ 100.17 10/25/03
Best 60': 2.07 (stock RS-A's at 30psi)
Best Dyno: 5/3/03
197.4fwhp/262.4fwtq
Coming Soon....
turbo!!
|
|
|
07-20-2003, 07:56 PM
|
#118
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
|
HA HA!! Please tell me Bubba isn't here. The guy with the 92 GP is beyond bullshitting. The 92 Grand Prix GTP came with the 3.4 liter Normally Aspirated Twin Dual Cam. Why do people like this insist on giving Grand Prix owners a bad name.  Don't listen to the tool. I just thought I'd come over here and shed a little light on the lies this guy is trying to pull off. I mean he doesn't even know what his car runs. Top speed: 180 or something....never really got to try. Give me a break. I'm done. I just really hate to see stuff like this. It's rediculous.
Oh by the way.
1994 Grand Prix SE
1/8th time: 10.47 at 67.34mph
Top Speed: 108
Horsepower and stuff I have no idea. It's slow so I don't care.
__________________

[link=http://teamoctane.com/clubmembers.html]Click here for member rides.[/link]
[link=http://www.cardomain.com/id/gpimp31]Pics of my ride.[/link]
|
|
|
07-20-2003, 10:48 PM
|
#119
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
|
92 Grand prix SE 11's, I WISH!!!!! you make me sick to even think i drive a 92 Grand prix se, i think i'll go do the honorable thing and ram it into a tree.
|
|
|
07-20-2003, 11:01 PM
|
#120
|
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Originally posted by grandprix92
K&N air filter, borla exaust, came supercharged already, lost weight, made the car lose weight (ripping out the back seats) lowered it for aerodynamics, and a little nitrous doesnt hurt
|
The slushbox of an auto transmission would not be able to handle that insane amount of HP.
I'd sure like to see pictures of this 'supercharged' 3.4..
Pulling out the back seats will save you MAYBE, 5-10 pounds at the most.. their just formed foam with fabric over them. Even if you had the rear bucket option, that's not much more weight at all.
1990 Turbo Grand Prix 5 Speed
1/4 mile: 15.2 (can't remember MPH, and don't have the slips handy, wasn't too proud of the times anyway)
Haven't dyno'd yet, only owned the car since April.
|
|
|
|