Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Videos Got a crazy video to share? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
08-12-2004, 02:55 PM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Glendale, California
Posts: 3,424
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
|
lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl save target as
|
|
08-13-2004, 09:47 AM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
Pretty cool. The NSX-R seems amazingly fast for a 280 hp car. But I bet that if any of the other cars had the same wacko Gan San driver, it wouldve have been at the top.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures) |
|
08-14-2004, 04:12 PM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
the nsx driver pushed his car a lot more and drove more aggressive.
|
|
08-16-2004, 11:26 PM | #5 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
even if the nsx-r driver was better, he wouldnt be that much better, and some think that other drivers in there are better. that car also has the least power out of all of those cars, a lot less power than those lamborginis, and even if its lighter, its power to weight ratio is worse too. the weight of that car is what helped it a lot though, it was able to brake, and corner better than all those cars. pretty good chassis for a car that was designed 14+ yrs ago.
|
|
08-16-2004, 11:58 PM | #6 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
great video the nsx -r was a good car but it suck in the stait aways but its a good car for be 14 years old
|
|
08-17-2004, 03:10 AM | #7 | ||
CFA
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
Quote:
|
||
08-17-2004, 01:26 PM | #8 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
Quote:
|
||
08-19-2004, 04:44 PM | #9 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Troy, Michigan
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Wow, just wow. NSX was really impressive given the competition. Yay for Lambo though. Actually, the M3 was pretty impressive in the turns. It seems a bit outclassed in speed though.
"Help me! Oh wait, I think I'm faster!" Haha, I loved the talking. |
|
08-20-2004, 03:25 AM | #10 | ||
CFA
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: lambos vs. ferrari vs. porsche turbo vs. nsx vs. m3 csl
Quote:
The M3CSL would have benefited from its semi-slick Michelins |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|