Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
03-13-2002, 02:59 PM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Personally, I drove a '00 tacoma trd offroad package, '01 frontier kc/sc, and a '98 frontier kc/2.4l 4x4, and out of the three, I chose the '98. It was $12,900, low miles, and really, I didn't see a huge difference in the others, except price. I have off-roaded a lot in my Nissan and have yet to get stuck and never had a problem. I am very happy with my decision, especially since my friend works in a machine shop that the nissan and toyota dealers both use, and he has seen a lot much v6's from both companies come in for work than the 4 cylinders. Nissan has always made durable 4cylinder engines, so I have no worries.
|
|
05-05-2004, 07:09 PM | #17 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: bellevue, Washington
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: supercharged Frontier
okay, okay, enough crap on the stupid horse power, what really matters is the torque as well as hove the tranny delivers it. Ive driven a Taco extensivly (girlfriends) I hailed crap with it raced it (on the street) and towed many a trailer with it....In my opinion the Taco is faster...BUT...my normaly asperated fronty will pull, drag, tow, whatever wwwAAAAYYYYY more than the taco. So unless you street racing a taco the fronty is a STRONGER truck
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|