Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: which is the fastest?
Toyota Celica 0 0%
Acura Integra 0 0%
Dodge Daytona 5 26.32%
Ford Probe 0 0%
Toyota Supra 9 47.37%
Mitsubishi Eclipse 3 15.79%
Other (please specify) 2 10.53%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2003, 08:00 PM   #1
$ilverbullet
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to $ilverbullet
Best Preformance (speed) out of these cars?

what do you all think is faster for my low $1500-$2000 budget? late 80s-early 90s of course

Toyota Celica
Acura Integra
Dodge Daytona
Ford Probe
Toyota Supra
Mitsubishi Eclipse
Other

most likely i will be leaning towards the Celica or the Supra. What do you guys think?
__________________
My 1993 240SX SE Fastback
$ilverbullet is offline  
Old 01-23-2003, 11:36 AM   #2
Polygon
The Red Baron
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpine, Utah
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
The best bang for the buck IMO is the Daytona or a DSM. They can both be made to go WAY fast for little money, and the are both VERY reliable.
Polygon is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 07:16 AM   #3
Neutrino
Yaya Master
 
Neutrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Quote:
Originally posted by Polygon
The best bang for the buck IMO is the Daytona or a DSM. They can both be made to go WAY fast for little money, and the are both VERY reliable.
I concur.
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Neutrino is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 02:22 PM   #4
NISSANSPDR
AF Fanatic
 
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
I think the Supra if it's the Supra that comes to mind...will kill everything here...

Supra TT that is...320HP inline 6 twin turbo...6 spd manual!
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


NISSANSPDR is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 03:00 PM   #5
FYRHWK1
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 324
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FYRHWK1
yeah I'd have to go with a shelby daytona, broken transmissions and snapped timing belts plague DSM's and that stuff gets costly, obviously the supra has the most potential period but you're talking 20-30K for a USED high mile car, fook that.
FYRHWK1 is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 03:49 PM   #6
$ilverbullet
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to $ilverbullet
so it comes down to Daytona and Supra =)

the Celica is way cheaper, how would you compare a Celica to a Supra?
__________________
My 1993 240SX SE Fastback
$ilverbullet is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 06:00 PM   #7
fatninja19
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
I'm voting for the Dodge Daytona because I'd have to disagree with a DSM being very reliable... especially that trans..

a turbo'ed 2.2L with 174 hp and 200 lb/ft sounds pretty good... What kind of potential are we talking about here, folks?

and NISSANSPDR.. I think you totally missed the point of his $1500-2000 budget.. But the MKIV Supra TT would have the most potential though..
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
fatninja19 is offline  
Old 01-24-2003, 07:07 PM   #8
$ilverbullet
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to $ilverbullet
Quote:
NISSANSPDR.. I think you totally missed the point of his $1500-2000 budget..
true but in a way he didn't. I'm still learnin =)
__________________
My 1993 240SX SE Fastback
$ilverbullet is offline  
Old 01-25-2003, 10:35 AM   #9
Polygon
The Red Baron
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alpine, Utah
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
Quote:
Originally posted by fatninja19
a turbo'ed 2.2L with 174 hp and 200 lb/ft sounds pretty good... What kind of potential are we talking about here, folks?
A LOT. You all have seen the 10 second K-Car that dropped a Supra like a bad habit, and if you haven't I can post it. In my opinion any car with the 2.2L I4 with the Turbo II option is the best bang for the buck. Hell they even come with a German Getrag forged five speed, the A-555 and A-568 have been called the most badass transaxles ever, all they need is to replace the open differential with an LSD. Certain years of the DSMs have problems from 1995 - 1997 the rest are fairly reliable. Or so I hear, BTW I did vote for the Daytona of course. I could ramble on about the Turbo II all day, but I'll refrain.

For the price the Daytona can be the fastest for the least cash.

Last edited by Polygon; 01-27-2003 at 04:28 PM.
Polygon is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 12:47 PM   #10
Gonthrax
Skyline Guy
 
Gonthrax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Gonthrax
I'll add my vote for the Daytona.
__________________
Member of AF's Slide Squad (Member #04)

Quote:
Originally posted by taranaki
Postcounts - Phoey....it's not how often you speak,it's whether you actually say anything that matters.

Neishlin Motors
Soon to be my best friend
Gonthrax is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 01:03 PM   #11
Scott 02
Banned
 
Scott 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Scott 02 Send a message via Yahoo to Scott 02
As much as i hate to say it, but i think the Supra. It has way more acceleration than the Daytona and i think it can beat it top speed. Im no import guy but thats how i see it.
Scott 02 is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 10:11 AM   #12
YogsVR4
Funding the welfare state
 
YogsVR4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Petoskey, Michigan
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
Quote:
Originally posted by NISSANSPDR
I think the Supra if it's the Supra that comes to mind...will kill everything here...

Supra TT that is...320HP inline 6 twin turbo...6 spd manual!
Stop for a second. His budget is 1500-2000 dollars. There is no way in hell he's getting a 94+ Supra TT for 2K. Ain't gonna happen.



Edit: I say the 94+ because of the numbers quoted for the Supra













Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
YogsVR4 is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 03:44 PM   #13
Scott 02
Banned
 
Scott 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Scott 02 Send a message via Yahoo to Scott 02
I have seen some were i live. I know they are hard to find but not real hard. Well then go with the Daytona . Definatly not the Probe
Scott 02 is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 05:13 PM   #14
$ilverbullet
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to $ilverbullet
sweet, i suppose i might get a Supra then. Gotta find another job first, the one i have, i make barely anything lol.

How much would a decent milage early 90s or late 80s Supra be priced at on average?
__________________
My 1993 240SX SE Fastback
$ilverbullet is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 05:35 PM   #15
flylwsi
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,347
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flylwsi
you're talking about the mk3 supra yes?

you could find one in that price range with a turbo on it...

decent mileage would be 100k or less...

the mkiv starts in 93.
so the older body isn't a bad start...
i know of one here for 3k. nice car, under 100k miles, and no problems with it... no rust. dark blue...

so you can find one
flylwsi is offline  
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts