 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-13-2007, 01:27 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thunderbird v Mustang
Posted this in the racing section on accident but:
96 Thunderbird V8 stock 01 Mustang V6 w/ Superchip Drag.. Both Auto. |
|
|
|
|
07-13-2007, 02:15 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Steamboat, Colorado
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
I'd say Bird, just a guess.
Wasn't there a S/C V8 Bird that year?
__________________
1998 Chevrolet Blazer LT (95% stock)  Pioneer AVH-P7500 DVD receiver 12" Alpine Type-R in a sealed box PIAA Super Plasmas GT-X bulbs PIAA Xtreme White bulbs K & N drop-in filter   "Melo" and "AI". Enough said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-14-2007, 06:05 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
Was there ever a SC V8 bird from 80 on up? I am sure that 96 was a V8 or SC V6. The V8 in the bird was not that powerful in 96..... I know it was not as powerful as the Mustang in 96 and the mustang only had 215 HP in 96.
__________________
Currently own -2007 Civic EX coupe Have owned -1999 Dodge Dakota -2000 Mustang GT -1991 Cavalier -1997 Taurus GL -1987 Ranger V6 -1985 Aries |
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 05:35 AM
|
#4 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Balluville
Posts: 1,142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-19-2007, 09:24 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: pottstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
Yes it was.
__________________
Currently own -2007 Civic EX coupe Have owned -1999 Dodge Dakota -2000 Mustang GT -1991 Cavalier -1997 Taurus GL -1987 Ranger V6 -1985 Aries |
|
|
|
|
|
07-23-2007, 09:29 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montgomery Village, Maryland
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
gotta go with the Bird.
Mustangs are nice, but a V6 is just not a parallel to the V8, even with a chip. (in those two cars, at least.) also, the Chiefs are my team too, I'm from Blue Springs. so i thought i would share. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-24-2007, 11:49 PM
|
#7 | |
|
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
I think the mustang would pull it off, even though it's not a v8, superchips do wonders to some cars, and I imagine that it would also be lighter than the T-Bird if I'm not mistaken.
__________________
 2003 CBR 600RR Traded in for 2006 SV650S! U.S. Navy Military Police |
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2007, 09:03 AM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: forestville, Wisconsin
Posts: 213
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Thunderbird v Mustang
the mustang would most definately beat the bird check out these 1/4 mile specs
http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes and then compare them to the mustangs here http://www.dragtimes.com/results.php...arch+DragTimes remember in this comparison the mustangs listed do not have the superchip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
