Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
10-28-2004, 09:17 PM | #31 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Staten Island, New York
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
No offense, but try to keep thread posting within a 3 month timeline; Or repost the subject.
__________________
1988 Mustang 5.0 5spd/CAI,BBK 65mm TB,BBK underdrive pulleys, Flowmaster catback, E303 cam, headers, mass air conversion, Steeda tri ax shifter, 3.73 gears, Trick Flow street intake, 3g 130 Amp Alt. |
|
10-29-2004, 11:44 AM | #32 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Inline-6 vs V6
Quote:
|
||
11-04-2011, 11:42 PM | #33 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Inline-6 vs V6
Something that I did not see is diesel engines, if v engines were so supperior to inline engines than why are the majority of long haul rigs inline engines?
A lot of things depend on technology and packaging, its really hard to say which is better or worse, because its hard to compare directly the two types of engines |
|
03-27-2013, 04:27 AM | #34 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Inline-6 vs V6
Quote:
Now as far as inline 6ers go ford made a 300 cubic inch sixxer that was built by the hundreds of millions since it was in production from the 60s until the mid 90s. That inline sixxer went into everything from full size dump trucks to passenger vans and trucks and ford even outfitted generators,wood mulchers and many other industrial uses with that 300 inline sixxer. I even read that it was just awesome as a race engine in some classes as well. Then there is the slant six from dodge and Chevy's inline sixxers that were also legendary for durability. Then there are the German inline sixxers that are absolutely stellar and refined. There are also examples of incredibly durable v-6s such as the Chevy 3.8 that once the intake manifold gasket was fixed the engines would run forever and get 30mpg to boot in the boats they were put into. And lets not forget the Japanese and their contribution. If not for the Japanese raising the bar here in North America we would still be stuck with the nightmare 305s of the 80s with the soft cams and 318s with nylon timing gears. Through it all though ford always had the 302 and the 351. Those engines were always durable. Not one year were they bad or had to watch out for,not like most other manufacturers. As far as best goes each engine as long as each engine was maintained adequately I'd find it hard to say one or the ther was best. In a performance car I'm sure some engines did better than others and some ran dump trucks better then potentially a different design would. Sorry. Didn't see the date of last post. Thread resurrected. Oops |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|