Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-28-2004, 09:17 PM   #31
andrewespo
AF Enthusiast
 
andrewespo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Staten Island, New York
Posts: 276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No offense, but try to keep thread posting within a 3 month timeline; Or repost the subject.
__________________
1988 Mustang 5.0 5spd/CAI,BBK 65mm TB,BBK underdrive pulleys, Flowmaster catback, E303 cam, headers, mass air conversion, Steeda tri ax shifter, 3.73 gears, Trick Flow street intake, 3g 130 Amp Alt.
andrewespo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2004, 11:44 AM   #32
Tony H
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Inline-6 vs V6

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightsun13
ok first off shinrekka: i gots a v6 with 350k on and it was only rebuilt once 50k ago (88 toyota 4-runner) and no other major problems regular oil change and stuff just like you so asfar as inlines outliving v's...........no also in reference to the balance comments a firing pattern on a v crosses out the vibration since its criss cross so they are just as smooth \
rob
It would be nice if a v really worked that way, but in the real world, it doesn't.
Tony H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2011, 11:42 PM   #33
TLMjared
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lightbulb Re: Inline-6 vs V6

Something that I did not see is diesel engines, if v engines were so supperior to inline engines than why are the majority of long haul rigs inline engines?
A lot of things depend on technology and packaging, its really hard to say which is better or worse, because its hard to compare directly the two types of engines
TLMjared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2013, 04:27 AM   #34
Shreddin Rubber
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Inline-6 vs V6

Quote:
Originally Posted by audi&benz View Post
First off, you believe that V6s are superior, so prove to me that they are. Dont tell me to provide evidence that says that I6s are better. In my opinion they are, so prove me wrong jackass.

Secondly, many I8s were made. Mercedes made them up to just a few years ago, when they stopped, I dont know why, but they did.

Since I am not an engine expert I decided to do some research.
A straight-6, which has advantages over the V-6 design: inline-6 engines has significantly less vibrations (second-level vibrations are absent), it is more smooth, has less friction (there is only one bank of cylinders and twice less camshafts to deal with), cheaper in production and lighter. And as far as I can tell the only advantage to a V6 is that it takes up less room in the engine compartment.
I think inline 8s just weren't feasible in the engine bay anymore. Too long. And the v-8s of today just kick butt so no need to explore the I-8 tech.
Now as far as inline 6ers go ford made a 300 cubic inch sixxer that was built by the hundreds of millions since it was in production from the 60s until the mid 90s. That inline sixxer went into everything from full size dump trucks to passenger vans and trucks and ford even outfitted generators,wood mulchers and many other industrial uses with that 300 inline sixxer. I even read that it was just awesome as a race engine in some classes as well.
Then there is the slant six from dodge and Chevy's inline sixxers that were also legendary for durability.
Then there are the German inline sixxers that are absolutely stellar and refined.
There are also examples of incredibly durable v-6s such as the Chevy 3.8 that once the intake manifold gasket was fixed the engines would run forever and get 30mpg to boot in the boats they were put into. And lets not forget the Japanese and their contribution. If not for the Japanese raising the bar here in North America we would still be stuck with the nightmare 305s of the 80s with the soft cams and 318s with nylon timing gears.
Through it all though ford always had the 302 and the 351. Those engines were always durable. Not one year were they bad or had to watch out for,not like most other manufacturers.
As far as best goes each engine as long as each engine was maintained adequately I'd find it hard to say one or the ther was best.
In a performance car I'm sure some engines did better than others and some ran dump trucks better then potentially a different design would.

Sorry. Didn't see the date of last post. Thread resurrected. Oops
Shreddin Rubber is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts