Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
05-27-2002, 03:26 AM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
murcielago VS diablo
SO many people like diablo and I was wondering whats the advantage of getting a diablo? Is murcielago's quality worse than diablo?
|
|
06-05-2002, 03:44 PM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Murcielago
I would not say it's much better, but it has several things that give it an advantage. HP went up some. The entire car is carbon fiber except for the doors. Transmission is smoother than a baby's bottom. I would give it the edge on the Diablo.
__________________
R.I.P. "Mama (my Z)" . . . But now we have the VR-4 #683/2000 "Dude, You fucking passed the test, but just barely, wanna know what you got?...F+......CLICK!" -Tenacious D(Jack BLack)- "Official Moron Crew Founder!" |
|
06-06-2002, 02:27 PM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Murcielago, yes or no
Hello,
it depends on what you're looking for, the latest Lamborghini Murcielago is without a doubt the BEST driving Lamborghini ever, but do you want that, an extremely fast car that isn't any more difficult to drive than say a fast BMW or a Porsche. With the Diablo you needed some experience, especially the rear wheel drive versions were rather unforgiving when pushing to the limit, also the styling was different, more aggressive some people might say, the Murcielago is very smooth, almost too smooth to be a Lamborghini according to several people. It's all just a matter of taste, and money, a Diablo will cost around 110,000 up to about $175,000 for a good one, while the Murcielago will still be near $300,000 for a few years to come. My personal favorite is still the Miura SV, an awesome, completely timeless design in my opinion. Kind regards
__________________
Mark Smeyers Lamborghini Cars http://www.lambocars.com |
|
06-07-2002, 04:30 PM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
I could not have said it better! Oh, I agree completely about the Diablo SV. It's "Like Driving on Ice!"
__________________
R.I.P. "Mama (my Z)" . . . But now we have the VR-4 #683/2000 "Dude, You fucking passed the test, but just barely, wanna know what you got?...F+......CLICK!" -Tenacious D(Jack BLack)- "Official Moron Crew Founder!" |
|
06-10-2002, 01:26 AM | #5 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Roadster
I must say i found love when I saw the yellow Diablo Roadster, yet the Murcielago looks kinda grow on you. the one thing that's lacking in the later Diablo is the boring headlight, I much prefer the close eye style with the earlier one.
The new Murcielago has beautiful headlight, which is an improvement from the Diablo, yet the rear end of the Murcielago is too fat render it unattractive. Given that most other drivers on the road will have a good treat of your BEHIND ( com on now, u don't drive at the speed limit in a raging Bull do you ) I thought a better ASS would be nice |
|
06-10-2002, 01:43 AM | #6 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 230
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
MERC vs DIABLO
Looks, everyone knows the Diablo beats the Merc into the ground. Everthing else, Merc smacks the Diablo around like a red-headed step child. Thats what happens when a high tech company (Audi) buys out an old-world legend.
|
|
06-30-2002, 08:59 AM | #7 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 690
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
sure the murcielago is amasing but i love th diablo i wish it could stay i want one soooo badly cus it is such a damn sick car
|
|
07-08-2002, 06:28 PM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
For looks its the Diablo, but the Murcie also looks pretty good and is a bit more powerful, I'd go with the Murcielago since IMO its got a better balance.
__________________
Hamann 2001 E46 M3 Laguna Seca 2 357.9 kw / 479.9 bhp @ 5400 rpm 312 kph / 193.9 mph 0-60 : 4.2 seconds Would I kill a man for it? You know it. |
|
07-16-2002, 09:33 AM | #9 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The Murciélago is clearly a better car. Is has a more powerfull engine, it has improved suspension and braking, it has a lowered center of gravity, corners better, is more friendly to the driver....
The Diablo is only better in its looks.
__________________
"Killing is my business... ... and business is good!" |
|
12-24-2002, 02:32 PM | #10 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Overall, the Murcielago is better I can tell you first hand because I used to have a 1999 Diablo SV.
|
|
12-25-2002, 05:57 AM | #11 | |
Click here
|
yea the murcielago is the better car with a modern technique.
but you also have to keep in mind that the murcielago is quite heavy. but you all should believe what sizzilin says. he should know what he talks about!!! |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|