Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-10-2010, 06:45 PM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Posts: 775
Thanks: 44
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
Kooky Tire Pressure Question
On a lot of cars, I'm guessing 1 out of three typical sedans, a different tire pressure is specified for the front axle vs the rear. Typically, it will read something like my old Ford Contour: Front: 31PSI - Rear: 34PSI. On other cars with different front/rear pressures I've seen "F: 29 - R:31" and even "Front: 33/Rear 36psi".
Now, folks, Smooth here lives by his GUT. And my gut instinct tells me, that in modern front-wheel drive cars, at lest 55-60% of their weight will be borne by the Front(read: LEADING) axle. Ergo, I would want more pressure in the tires under the heavy end of the car, and less pressure at the lighter end - so as to increase contact patch area and keep it planted back there in sudden turns, etc. In my 2008 Kia Optima, Kia recommends on the door jamb cold F/R 30psi. I run Front-33, Rear-31. Just that small offset has not only firmed up my ride but had eliminated some under-steer. My wife's 2005 Corolla - same thing. F:32psi, Rear:31psi. She maneuvers that thing through traffic on the Merritt Parkway - one-handed - 70 to 80mph! Why do mfgs with front-rear tire pressure offset seem to have it backwards according to my own gut & experience, putting more psi in the already potentially fishtailing rear axles of these already tail-light front-wheel drive cars? |
|
01-10-2010, 07:19 PM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Bearden, Arkansas
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Because manufacturers are stupid! That's why we have companies like Edlebrock and Summit Racing.. Because manufacturers don't know jack about the way cars SHOULD be run!
SAMSUNG-SGH-A177/A177UCIC3 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.101 (GUI) MMP/2.0 UP.Link/6.3.1.17.06.3.1.17.0 |
|
01-10-2010, 07:37 PM | #3 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: redondo beach, California
Posts: 646
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
And this has WHAT to do with tire pressures?
__________________
1989 Caprice Classic Wagon, Olds 307 ,SMI Q-Jet, 200R4 w/Shift kit, Flowmaster 50, Hotchkiss sway bars, KYB Shocks. Jet Chip, 1989 Mustang LX 5.0 5sp convertible 1992 Camry LE 2.2 1996 Suzuki RMX250 I'm a victim of circumstance [ |
||
01-11-2010, 12:04 AM | #4 | |
Nothing scares me anymore
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Manufacturers engineer cars to exhibit certain specific handling characteristics. Typically, benign or safe, predictable characteristics are chosen over 'performance' characteristics. For example, most cars are designed to understeer as one does through fast corners. The faster you go, the more understeer you get.
This is intended as a built-in warning device, so that the faster you drive through corners, the less responsive the car gets, so drivers know they are approaching the car's cornering limits. As drivers, we see this so much that we think this is natural. But often, it isn't, it is simply an engineered-in characteristic for safety. One could just as easily engineer a car to be 'neutral' that is, have no understeer, or in fact, oversteer as one goes through corners. So, having a higher tire pressure in the rear is simply a way of 'fine-tuning' such safety-related handling characteristics. A slightly lower pressure in front would increase understeer a bit, so the front end would 'push' more in fast cornering. But you do not actually have to go with this. I agree with you..... tire pressures should be set to achieve the same-size contact patch and sidewall shape on the front and back------ which usually means higher pressures in front for front-engine cars....... unless the car is fully-loaded. BTW, such tire pressure differences can get pretty extreme. The first-generation Chevy Corvair (1960-64) has a rear-weight bias and swing axles at the back (like an old VW Beetle or Porsche). This made for very odd, unpredictable handling at the back. So, GM specified 25 psi for the rear tires (normal for low pressure bias-plies) but only 15 psi at the front. Yes, just 15 psi. Now, the problem here was that unless one was aware of the specifics, people often put the same pressure at both ends (25 psi or so) which emphasised the squirrirly handling. Lots of Corvairs ended up rolling over, partly due to improper tire pressure, as reported in Ralph Nader's book, Unsafe at any Speed. |
|
01-11-2010, 06:30 AM | #5 | ||
SHO No Mo
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 10,951
Thanks: 100
Thanked 350 Times in 344 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
-Rod |
||
01-11-2010, 10:02 AM | #6 | |
The RustBuster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: La Plata, Maryland
Posts: 2,290
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 50 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
For all the cars/trucks I have owned, I have never seen the correlation between those labels and what I find to be the balance point between front & rear. The labels usually just state "35F/35R", presumably to just eke the most mileage out at the expense of the tires wear pattern.
I have typically run 31-33 psi in the fronts and 29-32 in the rears (generalizing for all my vehicles). Never had issues with uneven wear unless I was lax about checking them and the temps changed on me.
__________________
Current Garage: 2009 Honda CR-V EX 2006 Mazda 3i 2004 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 2003 GMC Envoy XL 2000 Honda ST1100 2000 Pontiac Sunfire Vehicle History: 2003 Pontiac Vibe AWD - 1999 Acura Integra GS - 2004 4.7L Dakota Quad Cab 4x4 - 1996 GMC Jimmy 4wd - 1995 Chevrolet C2500 - 1992 Toyota Camry LE 2.2L - 1992 Chevrolet S10 Ext. Cab 4.3L - 1995 Honda ST1100 - 1980 Yamaha XS400 - 1980 Mercury Bobcat. |
|
01-11-2010, 10:45 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
To the best of my knowledge, psi varies according to the brand of tire. I always inflate to within 2psi listed on the tires sidewalls. i.e. my Goodyears list Max. psi 44. So I go with 44 in winter & 42 Summer. (Outside temp. causes tire pressure to fluctuate slightly.
|
|
01-11-2010, 08:45 PM | #8 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: H-Town, Iowa
Posts: 166
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
The vehicle specified tire pressures are based on tire size (OEM tires) and vehicle weight/distribution...also as stated above it sounds like there is some safety factors thrown in for good measure. So I would vary tire pressure based from the recommend vehicle pressure not the maximum tire pressure. To give a few more points of reference here are the recommended tire pressures for my vehicles... Full Size Van - 35/44 psi [Front/Rear] Old Toyota- 27/27 psi [Front/Rear] New Civic - 32/32 psi [Front/Rear]
__________________
|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| |
||
01-11-2010, 11:44 PM | #9 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St.Louis, Missouri
Posts: 1,258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Just adding my 2cents as a mechanic: tire pressures are dangerous at 2 pressures : Too high and too low. Set em between 32-36 and don't think too hard about it. The sidewall is for MAX LOAD not normal driving but, know what it says and don't go over it. On newer cars with TPMS the door sticker may say set em at 29 but, I can tell ya, when that tire hits 26 the light will come on and you will get tired of it
|
|
01-12-2010, 03:47 PM | #10 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Posts: 775
Thanks: 44
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
Now, to tie this into the Corvair case. Would strict adherance to F:15/R:25psi have drastically cut down on the number of loss-control cases, flipping over cases associated with the Corvair? Also - it is general knowledge that the 1st Gen Corvair rear axles comprised of a primitive "swing-arm" [IMG]http://www.corvaircorsa.com/tech/earlyaxle.jpg[/IMG] - sorry! can't get the damn image to display in my reply! suspension in which under extreme movement the rear camber would drastically alternate between negative & positive, contributing to that squirrely handling. Would the above setup have contributed to far less of those incidents if the correct tire pressures(+ - 2lbs) were present? |
||
01-12-2010, 09:40 PM | #11 | ||
Nothing scares me anymore
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
The recommended tire pressure made the car understeer more, so it was less likely to slide the rear end when cornering. But once one got it sideways enough, the swing axle would lift the rear, allowing the wheel to go off-camber. When this happened, another Corvair deficiency came apparent.... the lack of "safety" rims. The old-style rims allowed the rear tire to peel off the rim, when the wheel was off-camber allowing the steel rim to dig into the pavement..... and over it went. So, correct tire pressure made the car less likely to get into trouble, but the car still rolled far too easily, and thus was considered a hazard. BTW, GM fixed this problem, with a redesigned rear suspension and "safety " rims in late -1963, 18 months before Ralph Nader's book was published. The old VW Beetle had worse safety problems than the Corvair, and Nader never went after VW. Why? Imo because Nader was somewhat self-serving, GM was a bigger target and better for launching his career. This video has a great analysis of the suspension problem and is an interesting analysis of the book. It makes the common claim that, if Nader had not targeted the Corvair, GM would have been more progressive and innovative in their car design in the '60's through '80's, and not let the imports get so far ahead. I am inclined to believe this..... GM never again built a truly innovative high-volume car. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF-8a...eature=related Last edited by MagicRat; 01-12-2010 at 10:33 PM. |
||
01-13-2010, 03:21 PM | #12 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Stamford, Connecticut
Posts: 775
Thanks: 44
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
Yeah, the 'Vair's not the only thing Nader could've wrecked. He helped Bush get elected in 2004(by winning the hearts & minds of Democrats!), and could have - but mysteriously didn't - helped McCain out, just by throwing his independent hat in the ring. I believe in my diagram the lower illustration reflects the changes you referred to, regarding the Corvair rear end. |
||
01-13-2010, 09:06 PM | #13 | ||
Nothing scares me anymore
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
Quote:
Also, you brought back some memories. I recall Democrats publicly pleading with Nader not to run for the reason you stated. Of course, his running was a pointless, self-serving exercise. But this video demonstrates Nader's attitude, he is in favor of taking action to make a point or to draw attention to a cause, regardless of the consequences or futility of the exercise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmd3I...eature=related |
||
02-02-2010, 09:16 PM | #14 | |
Caution: Monkeys bite!
|
Re: Kooky Tire Pressure Question
I've always adjusted my tire pressure according to how the tires were wearing. Starting in the neighborhood of the manufacturer's recommendations, check your wear pattern after 5 or 10k miles. If the tire is wearing in the center, it's overinflated. Edges wearing? Underinflated.
Agreed that max inflation pressure should match up with max weight on the tire. However with all the manufacturers and different tire designs and suggested pressures, you can't just go with one number, especially if you are putting a different tire than original on the vehicle.
__________________
Ours: 2020 Jeep Wrangler 2.0, 53k 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser, 84k Kids: 2005 Honda CRV, 228k |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Tags |
pressure , tire |
|
|