 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
03-17-2001, 08:11 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 211
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I had an argument with a person at my school about this. We compared the 911 to the NSX, and the spec's showed that the NSX was faster at 0-60, but slow in top speed. He still insisted t hat it was better because it had a top speed of 171. What is the NSX's top speed? What is your opinon?
__________________
Still wishin for a Sol.... but bought a Eclipse instead 92 Eclipse GS 1.8L |
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 10:27 AM
|
#2 | |||
|
Pretty much amazing
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 3,764
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I thought the 911's top speed was 173 mph. I still think the 911 is better. It has been around longer and therefore been more refined. The NSX is okay but you also see more 911's than NSX's.
__________________
 ec437 on grammar; Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 03:34 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd have to go with the NSX,
I really like Hondas [only NSX and Ludes  ]and I think that NSX is even faster on the track. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 03:40 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 288
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd take a 911 since its just wrong to japenese and supercar used in the same sentence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 03:41 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 154
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh yea?
 want take it outside?  |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 03:50 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Old Mod
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,506
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I take the NSX. Better looks, mostly.
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" |
|
|
|
|
|
03-17-2001, 03:53 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
The 911 any day of the week cause it is a better made car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-18-2001, 10:02 AM
|
#8 | |||
|
Pretty much amazing
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 3,764
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
BTW, what 911 are we talking about? The 911 Carrera 2 in CDN$ is about 100k the NSX is 140k, I think you should use a 911 Carrera 4 or even a Turbo. No, that's just not fair to put those two up against ech other. I'd still take the 911, Carrera 4 or not.
__________________
ec437 on grammar; Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
03-24-2001, 04:01 PM
|
#9 | |
|
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
911 TT or the GT2
no other 911's and for the NSX add a comptech SC and some other goodies to even out the price tags then we'll see whos better
__________________
00 Accord V6 - Sold 14.86@92.44 N/A 04 STi |
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2001, 04:57 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Horizontally Opposed
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 16,856
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
Despite the 0 - 60 times, the 911 will beat the NSX in a straight line eventually.
The NSX was built to eat up corners. Put 'em on a nice twisty road course and watch it tear it up! I'll take the NSX. |
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2001, 04:59 PM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i think hte porsche will take in the corners stock vs stock of course
__________________
00 Accord V6 - Sold 14.86@92.44 N/A 04 STi |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
