 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Technical Discuss different strategies and theories of the racing aspect. |
| View Poll Results: NOS or Supercharged | |||
| NOS (100 ponies) |
   
|
6 | 7.79% |
| Supercharged (100 ponies) |
  
|
71 | 92.21% |
| Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
08-06-2004, 10:01 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Camdenton, Missouri
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Here i am with my 79' Monte Carlo again. I want more PONIES!. ok, should i stay clean and keep my respect. or sould i play the same game rice dose and use a bottle
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 10:07 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
id do a supercharger, costs more, but always has the power. both would be cool.
__________________
1993 F-150 Lightning Mods-March UD pullies, Ltngdrvr CAI, Flowmasters, E-fans, and Eibach / Bell-Tech Drop Kit in the garage. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2149061/1 Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 10:27 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Camdenton, Missouri
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
ok now here's a thought,,, could you posibly have both, giving that you had forged internals and such??? would be fun
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 10:40 PM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 647
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
With enough money u can do anything...
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 11:39 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Some Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Fairbanks, Alaska
Posts: 2,695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
lol, he thinks nitrous is an import thing...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 11:56 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: portland, Maine
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
with the bottle you could blow your engine easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 11:57 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Nacogdoches, Texas
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
yeah...i always figured it was an all around american thing...that ricers abuse.
__________________
1995 GMC Sonoma 2.2L Inline 4 Cyl., 5 speed manual 155k miles (about) 120 HP - 135 ft. lbs/ torque No External mods., stock 16in. rims, wrapped in 4 diffrent sets of rubber...i should make it a sleeper...but wait...you need a powerful engine for that...  well, looks like i have to wait...
|
||
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 11:59 PM
|
#8 | |||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
i think its a german thing, i believe they used it during ww2 on thier fighters.
__________________
1993 F-150 Lightning Mods-March UD pullies, Ltngdrvr CAI, Flowmasters, E-fans, and Eibach / Bell-Tech Drop Kit in the garage. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2149061/1 Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
08-06-2004, 11:59 PM
|
#9 | |||
|
240SX Guy
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: melrose, Florida
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|||
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 12:07 AM
|
#10 | ||
|
STREET RACING GURU
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
damn. i wanted to say something first 
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 12:13 AM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Camdenton, Missouri
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Ah,,, im just gunna run it til it blows up then build a new one,,, this is my first car so i'll do all my mad scientist work on the old junker engine
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 02:52 AM
|
#12 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
If you're gonna do any forced induction, do a turbo...unless you're on a budget...
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 03:31 AM
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 663
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
^^79 monte carlo^^
turbo'ing that car is just plain waste of money. supercharger will give the same results and probably a grand cheaper
__________________
04 SRT-4 03 Evo 96 Talon TSi AWD *dead* 93 Talon TSi AWD *sold* 85 300ZX Turbo 90 300zx Twin Turbo 82 Karen 04 little boy |
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 03:37 AM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Okay, I've always had it forced down my throat that turbo > S/C...I can't wait 'till Neutrino gets to this thread...
 |
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004, 10:40 AM
|
#15 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
I own a 01 Monte Carlo...The 79 should just stay N/A...
__________________
2004.5 G35 Coupe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
