 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Videos Got a crazy video to share? |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
01-28-2004, 02:10 PM
|
#1 |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Glendale, California
Posts: 3,424
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
|
Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
|
|
|
|
01-28-2004, 10:40 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
That is the slowest FD in the world!
Honestly...a properly prepared and single turbo FD would spank the bejesus out of both those cars! (PS: This does NOT belong in car comparo...I goes to Car video section)
__________________
Yours truly, Gabriel 
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2004, 10:46 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota
Posts: 1,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
VERY disappointing to watch. that RX-7 should killed both cars...musta ben a non-turbo RX-7
__________________
"i told you it was third, I lengthen the injector pulse another millisec and tuned the NOS timer, and you'll run nines" --2OF9-- (DSM team specialist) ;D #808/1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
02-02-2004, 08:10 AM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
i agree, very disappointing
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2004, 12:17 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I dis aggree my self... I'm a Die hard Subaru fan. I"ve owned once myself. It was a 92 legacy sport, with turbo. I would smoke anything. But a new Impreza STI with 300 horse to all 4 wheels should and will take anything!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2004, 07:12 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
You guys really are giving the STI no credit at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2004, 05:54 PM
|
#7 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lindale, Texas
Posts: 182
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
STI won't take a 03 Cobra
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-08-2004, 01:37 AM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Spearfish, South Dakota
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
never under estimate a STI
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-10-2004, 12:39 PM
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 622
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
How heavy is the STi and the RX-7?
__________________
I have P.M.S. and a gun. Excuse me, you have something to say? What's wrong with abstinence? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2004, 02:43 AM
|
#10 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
People give the Subaru WRX STI no props. The 2004 STi with 300hp i know for a fact is faster stock than a twin turbo Supra, turboed RX7's, NSX, Evo whatever, Skyline, BMW M3, and is as fast as a 2003 Ford Mustang Cobra. STi 0-60 is 4.4 seconds. a fact. G-tech pro doesnt lie! Proven many times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2004, 02:45 AM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
A Mustang wont beat nor lose to the 2004 STi. The y are the same 0-60 and 1/4 mile. It's all about the reaction time and shifts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2004, 02:50 AM
|
#12 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
I dont know what the Viper is talking about, the Corvette C5 is faster. What now. And it cost less. As mush money you buy a viper for, take that money and suup up a STi and itl kill the Hennesy Viper. I say that from experience. Seen it, done it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2004, 02:51 AM
|
#13 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
I dont spit what i cant back-up. One
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-14-2004, 03:00 AM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Laurel, Maryland
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
3150lbs and 300hp is STi. 2694 lbs and 255hp is RX7.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-25-2004, 10:24 PM
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2004
Location: okc, Oklahoma
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Subaru STI vs. RX7 vs. Lightning
yall aint got nothing on my 10 second blown corrado.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
