Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Technical Discuss different strategies and theories of the racing aspect. |
View Poll Results: NOS or Supercharged | |||
NOS (100 ponies) | 6 | 7.79% | |
Supercharged (100 ponies) | 71 | 92.21% | |
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
08-09-2004, 12:40 AM | #31 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
anyways rootchargers loves dry N20 to cool them down and to give a nice boost at the same time a guy from jbody.org ran a mid 13 with 4.5psi and a 50 shot : ) everything else stock on the 2.4L engine not bad if you ask me so i say S/C + N2O = crazyness |
||
08-11-2004, 10:09 AM | #32 | ||
boost in, apex seals out
|
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
__________________
RX-7 TII |
||
08-12-2004, 10:11 PM | #33 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
o yeah forgot to mention the dude with the s/c and n2o setup dynoed at 270whp with that setup i think thats alot for a car only weighing 2612lbs
now he just updated us and is now running a 70hp dry shot and is running a 13.1 - 13.2 i think he traped at something like 112 i dunno ill have to find out :O still all on stock internals not bad if you ask me but superchargers + N2O = Lots of FUN i would suggest that to anyone thats into drag racing with there charger i cant imagine what that would do on a second gen 3800 s/c engine with forged interals that would just be crazy |
|
08-13-2004, 07:43 AM | #34 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm gonna have to vote for the blower, but I'm a bit biased Love my Paxton, even more now with the heads and intercooler. Just dyno'd 432rwhp/422rwtq.
__________________
-Dave '02 Dakota 5.9 R/T Intercooled Paxton - 11.3@120 425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon |
|
08-13-2004, 11:24 AM | #35 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
wanna trade engines lol im sure i could figuer out of to fit it in my tiny car lol |
||
08-15-2004, 08:21 AM | #36 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Big engines + little cars = FUN Like the Focus with the Cobra engine swap, crazy stuff.
__________________
-Dave '02 Dakota 5.9 R/T Intercooled Paxton - 11.3@120 425/W5/nitrous setup coming soon |
|
08-16-2004, 03:28 PM | #37 | ||
AF Newbie
|
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
most twin turbos on stock cars come with the same size turbo. in fact, i think all twin turbo cars have each turbo the same size, but there probably is some exception i dont know about. and it is pretty rare to see sequential turbos where one is small and the other big. think about it, its not like you can just cut off the first turbo. your big turbo will be limited by the small one. if you are pushing lots of boost on the big turbo, your little one wont be able to keep up and will fail. better way to go is just one large single. thats why lots of supra owners go single. |
||
08-23-2004, 12:29 PM | #38 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Supercharged
|
|
08-24-2004, 08:36 PM | #39 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 788
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Quote:
__________________
AF Bay Area Crew "Please try to refrain from smoking crack while typing. The literate community appreciates your restraint." AF User Guidelines |
||
09-01-2004, 08:54 PM | #40 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
Supercharger nos you will wind up hurting your engine in the long run and payin more for fills. No nos 4 u
__________________
Quote:
|
||
09-02-2004, 09:36 PM | #41 | |
Automotive love doctor
|
Weiand makes some good blowers for a good price, you can check them out in any jegs or summit type catalogs. The 144's sit pretty low, so you may not even have to invest in a cowl hood, that would be a decent sleeper indeed.
|
|
09-08-2004, 08:14 PM | #42 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ALEXANDRIA, Virginia
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I Would Deff. Go With Sc Alone. Much Safer. And More Reliable.
But If Your Thinking About Both Go With A Turbo And To Cover Up The Lag Thow In A Shot Of Nos. |
|
04-14-2005, 01:29 AM | #43 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 635
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
unfortunately you jumped in about 5 months late
__________________
DIE TRYIN FORGIVE BUT NEVER FORGET |
|
02-20-2006, 12:57 PM | #44 | |
AF Newbie
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
I like to huf nitrous but my truck dont...haha(uncontrolable laughing due to n2o intake)
If you go with n2o be sure to get the wet shot. You have less of a chance of buring pistons out... |
|
02-22-2006, 12:40 AM | #45 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER
but doesn't the smaller spooling turbo limit how much boost the larger turbo can run? or is it all in the set up. i thought i read that somewhere
__________________
2008 Mazda 6 ATX 2.3 Liters of Slowness For those 9 seconds it takes me to reach 60mph, will be the most fun ill have in this car. |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|