 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
12-11-2004, 07:06 PM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: rossville, Georgia
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
aerodydamics
ok what is better for aerodynamics a 2004 mustang cobra or a corvette c5? what body kits are avalible to improve aerodynamics
|
|
|
|
|
12-18-2004, 10:07 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Both manufacturers should have coeffeciants of drag. Dealerships will most likely have the info.
I have heard bomex does wind tunnel testing. I don't know if they make kits for those cars. Most kit manufacturers put very little thought into aerodynamics. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2004, 08:36 PM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Newbie
 Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: aerodydamics
based on just a general SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) and from looking at the shapes in profile I would venture to say that the 'Vette will be the more slippery shape. However, without analysis in a wind tunnel it is impossible to know which shape generates less lift.
I have no idea about the body kits since I have never used one, but I'd have to agree with ^ that most commercially available body kits are for looks only.
__________________
 I'm building the car of my dreams... La Bala - A Lightweight Sports Car for Street and Track http://www.grabercars.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
