Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
05-17-2003, 07:39 PM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Oaxaca
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2001 Accord brake pads last 3000 miles???
I bought my 2001 Accord V6 sedan in Laredo, Tx. about a 18 months ago. Drove it home (Oaxaca, Mexico, exactly 1000 miles south of the border). Put 11,000 miles of easy aroundtown driving, mostly, in a little over a year. Drove back to Laredo (all superhighway) and when I got there the front brakes were completely shot. Replaced the rotors and pads at the Laredo dealer, drove home again, being especially easy on the brakes. 16,500 miles, the brakes were gone again. The local Honda dealer said 3000 miles was normal life. 20,000 miles, the brakes are worn out again. Back at the dealership, they pointed to a sign painted on the wall: change oil at 5000km, filters at 10000km, etc. and a new line saying change front and rear pads every 5000km!!??
I am very easy on brakes: right foot brake with left foot planted on the floor, downshift going down hills, etc. I have never owned a car before that needed new pads in less than 30000 miles (Jeep Cherokee, VW Jetta, Chevy Caprice, Ford E150 were the last four). WTF is going on? At this rate, if I keep the car for 150,000 miles (my sister's 1996 Accord has 205,000) I will have spent $9000!!!! just on brake pads. The dealer swears that the 3000 miles per set of pads is normal for an Accord. Somebody please tell me he's putting me on, and suggest what could be causing my brakes to wear out so fast. Thanks. |
|
05-17-2003, 07:43 PM | #2 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NA
Posts: 1,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Sound like BS to me. I don't know about Accords but I drove 40k miles on the pads I bought it with before needing to change em and never warped rotors either.
|
|
05-18-2003, 12:09 AM | #3 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 522
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
try taking it to another dealership and see what they have to say about it. 3000 is way too short for the life of brakes, especially the rotors. if worse comes to worse, just replace the stock brakes with aftermarket rotors and pads. it may cost more at first, but it will save you money in the long run.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
05-18-2003, 11:10 PM | #4 | |
Slowest Automatic Civic
|
nah ur def getting dicked around, your pads should last much much longer, damn in the 5yrs i had my crx, i only changed the pads once, and i put 45000 on the car
__________________
Name: Scott Stable Of Cars I have Owned: 1991 Honda CRX 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2003 Honda Accord 1998 Chrysler Concorde 2007 Honda Civic 1997 Toyota Camry 1995 Saturn SC2 1996 Ford Taurus 1991 GMC Sierra 2002 Daewoo Leganza 1999 Dodge Ram 2007 Honda CR-V 2003 BMW 325i |
|
05-20-2003, 01:43 AM | #5 | |
AF Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Homeless, Illinois
Posts: 6,216
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
I have seen a 01 accord needing front/rear pads&rotors with only 12,000 miles on it. Most cases brakes pads are lasting 20-45,000 on the newer accords. We usually see the rear disc go before the front since they have a smaller pad. there was another car that had 80,000 miles still running original pads & rotors with 40% wear. Its how & where you drive.
stick with honda brake pads when replacing |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|