 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-26-2003, 08:48 AM
|
#16 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah, there is no question the NSX is a track car.
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
07-27-2003, 11:03 AM
|
#17 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The NSX was forced to be a track car due to the stupid 280BHP agreement.
I haven't seen an NSX with more than 500bhp in tuned trim, which is the new performance benchmark for any car within this market sector. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2003, 01:44 PM
|
#18 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-27-2003, 05:30 PM
|
#19 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The gentlemans agreement for all the japanese co making supercars. 280hp is the limit, and its that way because they dont want to get caught up in a "horsepower war" where all the co just one up each other with power numbers and neglect the rest of the car which they accuse american car makers of doing. I think what they're doing is equally stupid.
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2003, 10:14 PM
|
#20 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Damn...that sucks. I really do want to see an NSX with a 400HP V8. Shit...the f20c has 240hp, I think they could've EASILY got more out of a c32b then 290hp. DAMN! THAT IS GAY!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
07-27-2003, 11:24 PM
|
#21 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeapers...
I think even an equal displacement V10 with more revs wouldda blown the current 290bhp away.
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 04:51 AM
|
#22 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Very, very easily...but probably a lot more expensive. I would love to see that though...Honda V10, NICE
 |
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 10:27 AM
|
#23 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah considering the current Honda F1 motor makes over 800hp @ 18,000 rpms with no variable timing and NA, i think they could put a little something together for us, say 400hp?
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 10:34 AM
|
#24 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ahhh....I have wet dreams about a 500HP NSX!
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 11:09 AM
|
#25 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i have them about just the stocker
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 05:14 PM
|
#26 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: T.O.
Posts: 1,175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Okay guys, calm down.
heh Well, if you want to see a tuned NSX, still restricted in some respects, but still tuned; check out the JGTC NSXs. 3.5L DOHC 490-500 bhp
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
07-28-2003, 05:45 PM
|
#27 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeap them too, props ro good old mugen for them pieces, and props to gran turismo so we can play with them
__________________
Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-14-2003, 04:20 AM
|
#28 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Posts: 178
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
 Anybody got info on GT4 cars? I heard something about it including ferrari's and lambo's but I'm not sure.... |
||
|
|
|
|
10-19-2003, 11:31 PM
|
#29 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver / Guadalajara Mex
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well the NSX IS REALLY FAST MAN.
7.5 too far off track. Besides thats a crappy 4 speed automatic, look into the real sports car, the 6 speed 290hp. That car is rated 0-60mph in the mid 4s. Every one that tests it comes out with a low 4 mid 4 0-60 and a high 13 1/4 mile. That isnt slow. Youve seen the NSX type S zero. 4.1 0-60 mph, and a stunning 12.9, 13.0 sec on the 1/4 mile. That is what a porshe turbo or a modena are running. low 4s mid 13s aint slow. Thats fast. Thats close to a viper with 500 hp.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-19-2003, 11:43 PM
|
#30 | |
|
2 people short of a 3way
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Queensbury, New York
Posts: 302
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Someone please tell me this isn't true about the NSX 0-60 mph time...
If honda makes a V10 NSX in the future, you'll see me in line for one. Imagine revving to 14K RPMs, or higher?
And when the hell does GT4 come out? Over 500 cars according to the display box, but no Lambo's or Ferrari's would be disappointing (as well as no McLaren F1). |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
