Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
10-12-2010, 08:10 AM | #16 | |
AF - Advisor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 112
Thanked 41 Times in 39 Posts
|
Re: 94 fuel pump not working
Oh, stay with the stock rated fuse. It's possible the connector shorted while you were maneuvering the tank...I guess that's why they say "disconnect the battery" on every repair except a tire change.
|
|
10-12-2010, 09:48 PM | #17 | ||
Registered Offender
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rural
Posts: 6,518
Thanks: 6
Thanked 341 Times in 336 Posts
|
Re: 94 fuel pump not working
Quote:
The other thing to check is the ground connection near the tank since it is critical to proper pump operation. The ground connection is exposed to the elements in its location, and can corrode over time causing resistance. Less than 1 ohm can drop pump supply voltage enough to render it useless for making adequate staring pressure. Incidentally, a 20A fuse isn't likely to help a thing unless the correct fuse is already blown. The pump doesn't need anything near that. [RANT] I often get a chuckle when I read comments about "original" parts, recalling how back in the good old days large numbers of people used to advise not using Bosch injection parts and sensors. If they only understood that Bosch was the OEM supplier to GM they might think differently. Delphi doesn't actually MAKE anything to speak of any more, and most of the majors have been sourcing their parts for decades now. I used to work for a Tier II supplier to GM (and Ford, and Honda, and Nissan, and some of the others in little lots), and we would stamp thousands of parts with a GM, Delco (then Delphi), AC Spark Plug, and PED names and numbers. We even made valves for the later SBC, LS, Northstar, and Gen III Chevy V-6s (plus Honda internal engine fasteners, Nopar parts, Ford parts, Nissan parts, yada). BTW - Don't ever use a Robertshaw PCV valve or radiator cap on a GM. They're probably not anywhere near as good... The one advantage to using OEM branded parts is that they probably have to meet some level of SPC/QC and general standards. The raw aftermarket doesn't have to deal with that and can get away with being lazy at times. If you buy the lowest price Pacific Rim components you're probably going to get exactly what you paid for. If you buy good quality components, the name on the box is not as likely to matter. After replacing several dumpsters full of failed factory parts I would NEVER touch factory parts in some applications. Exploded planetary gearsets and deformed shells and drums in GM transmissions have taught me to find something better. Leaking intake gaskets to the point of class action suits, valve springs suitable for retractable ball pens, idler arms wearing out faster than the tires, camshaft billets snapping at the pump drive gear, timing sprockets with plastic teeth, and other failures should remind us that original isn't always best. There are exceptions. For example, don't ever even think of using anything but an AC/Delco distributor cap for a later 262 V-6 or older Vortec V-8 unless it's an emergency and you only need to go 500 miles. The aftermarket just hasn't figured that one out, and can't seem to get the insulation epoxy right. In short, don't condemn a replacement part by name. I can name probably as many parts from the factory with bigger problems, and it's possible that Walbro made the original pump anyway. [/RANT]
__________________
Permanent seat assignment on the Group W bench... Automotive Forums Survival Guide |
||
10-13-2010, 07:37 AM | #18 | |
AF - Advisor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 112
Thanked 41 Times in 39 Posts
|
Re: 94 fuel pump not working
That's why I listen to dealer line mechanics and hold them in great esteem.
They change out these parts for decades and often have to deal with home "fixes" including replacing inferior cheapo parts. I am disgusted by engineering goof jobs like the plastic intake manifold gaskets and new venture/GM & Chrysler's inside joke transfer cases along with the other items you mention. |
|
10-13-2010, 09:51 PM | #19 | |
Advisor/Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belleville, Michigan
Posts: 5,184
Thanks: 6
Thanked 103 Times in 95 Posts
|
Re: 94 fuel pump not working
GM S & T body vehicles, (Bravada, Jimmy, Blazer, & pick ups) do not use an inertia switch, never have. Also, contrary to popular belief, if engine oil pressure drops to zero, the oil pressure switch WILL NOT shut off the fuel pump.
As mentioned earlier, circuits at the pump are critical. Unplug the fuel pump module electrical connector and check for battery voltage on the grey wire for 2 seconds when the ignition is initially turned to the RUN position. After 2 seconds voltage should drop to zero. It should show battery voltage continuously when the ignition is in the START position. The black wire must show less than 5 ohms resistance to a good, clean chassis ground at all times. Post your results.
__________________
You have to know how it works, to figure out why it doesn't. |
|
10-17-2010, 06:51 PM | #20 | |
AF - Advisor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Posts: 2,919
Thanks: 112
Thanked 41 Times in 39 Posts
|
Re: 94 fuel pump not working
What's the latest Fishingirl?
__________________
1992 Bravada, 201K, stock 1997 Bravada, 101K, stock...was "called away" "Cornbread Red", 2001 Dodge 2500,4X4,HO Cummins Diesel,QC,SWB,6spd.,Banks boost&pyro,US Gage fuel press.,Edge Drag Comp,4"exh.,cowl hood, bhaf, black Holley pump, 140gph...13psi WOT, Vulcan Big Line, kevlar/ceramic single disc clutch, cheapo fuel cooler, 8x.010" vco injector nozzles, Cat turbo 62-65-.70A/R, 497hp 1089 tq 8/25/14 Time to turn so's you don't burn. |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|