Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-23-2005, 10:14 PM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
hey... ugly is just a matter of opinion.
and toyota... what do they have to offer as sports cars... a celica? mr2? nothing that even breaks 200hp... unless you count the solara, but honestly... i dont consider toyota much of anything so far as sports cars. |
|
07-25-2005, 05:47 AM | #17 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 861
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
I definetly feels like there is more torque that there really is. I haven't test drove the 05 but i test dorve an 04 the other day, and I must say I was rather impressed. It test drove that and WRX Imprezza in the same day, and the RSX Type S would have easily taken the WRX Imprezza off the line.
Quote:
Actually they don't even offer the celica anymore. They dropped that to further the Scion line with I have heard (don't know if it is true or not) that they are planning to make the Tc come stock supercharged in the future. If you want a toyota that is breaking 200hp though your only real opinion is the soloria. Other than that you need to start looking at the lexus in the toyota family
__________________
2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT Debagged, 18" MKW Rims, 5% Tint, Ralliart Eyelids, Outlaw Racing IM and TB Spacers, Ingals "Stiffy", Energy Suspension Polyurethane Motor Mounts, Tanabe Lower Tie/Strut Bars, Progress Rear/Eibach Front Sway Bar, D2 Racing Lowering Springs, RRE Headers and Axelback, AEM CAI w/ Bypass, 12000k HID Heads, 3000k HID Fogs, Sunroof Wind Visor, Drilled/Slotted Front/Rear Rotors, and Ceramic Brake Pads. Last edited by cficare68; 07-26-2005 at 06:08 AM. |
||
07-25-2005, 05:27 PM | #18 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
wow... with as many celica's that i see on the road, i wouldnt have expected them to drop that.
not that i liked the car anyway... |
|
07-26-2005, 06:03 AM | #19 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Vale
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
The Celica isn't selling well, especially since the RSX, SRT-4, Cobalt, and now their own tC has been released.
__________________
|
|
07-26-2005, 06:15 AM | #20 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 861
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Yeah not to mention that they wanted like 30,000 dollars for a brand new GTS and they wanted even more for the Action pack celica (a joke my opinion) There are things that are alot quicker and alot cheapier on the market. For that much money.
__________________
2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT Debagged, 18" MKW Rims, 5% Tint, Ralliart Eyelids, Outlaw Racing IM and TB Spacers, Ingals "Stiffy", Energy Suspension Polyurethane Motor Mounts, Tanabe Lower Tie/Strut Bars, Progress Rear/Eibach Front Sway Bar, D2 Racing Lowering Springs, RRE Headers and Axelback, AEM CAI w/ Bypass, 12000k HID Heads, 3000k HID Fogs, Sunroof Wind Visor, Drilled/Slotted Front/Rear Rotors, and Ceramic Brake Pads. |
|
07-27-2005, 07:43 AM | #21 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Celica is dead, Mr2 is dead...Toyota is phasing them out for 2006...There just wasn't enough margin on them and sales were slowing on both products
Toyota does understand the new trend for powerful and practical sports cars, and look for some interesting new entries in the near-future Also, look for the IS350, its supossed to be a 3 series killer...300+hp 3.5L V6 and styling thats very un-lexus like
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
||
07-27-2005, 08:26 AM | #22 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Vale
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
With the new BMWs looking so weird and being just as overpriced, I think Lexus has a great opportunity. Too bad the RL's sales haven't been good for Acura
__________________
|
|
07-27-2005, 10:01 PM | #23 | |||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Quote:
and its sad that the RL's arent selling well...but after 4 months of co op I could have gone to the morons at Honda and told them that Executives dont want V6's no matter how much hp they put out....oh and its gotta be bigger, and look slung and lazy, like an Audi
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
|||
07-28-2005, 07:06 AM | #24 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Vale
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Yeah, to me I like the RL but the general public wants a big bragging sheet with their cars.
And the 2006 330i looks like it was the result of a threesome with a Mazda3, a Civic, and Tubgirl.
__________________
|
|
07-28-2005, 10:05 PM | #25 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Don't ever speak of tubgirl! ugh horrible pictures in my head now, im gonna be sick
3 series is rough...but I wouldnt go that far As for RL heres what im saying Just the way its slung forward and aggressive VERSUS which is slung a little further back, more relaxed passive look Oh and this is another reason rich execs dont buy RL's I mean how many A8's and 760's do you see doing that??
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
||
07-29-2005, 09:39 PM | #26 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Oh, lord, that is making me sick just looking at it......poor RL!!
|
|
07-30-2005, 01:10 AM | #27 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sanfrancisco, California
Posts: 105
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
lol, I really like the RL but i don't think it can compete with the A8(which has either the v8 or W12 motor) adn the 760i with only a V6. I think the RL can go toe to toe with the new and ugly 530i.
Compared to the A8 the RL looks like a rental car. |
|
07-31-2005, 03:21 PM | #28 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Vale
Posts: 1,204
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Thats a photochopped RL :P
__________________
|
|
07-31-2005, 08:29 PM | #29 | |||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Quote:
Thats not the point! the point is that how can you expect an Acura to compete with an A8 when ppl treat it a friggin tuner-car...the entire Honda/Acura brand is typecast to be these stupid ricer mobiles...and an executive or CEO looks at an RL and happns to see something like that, is he really gonna get it? hell think its a civic
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
|||
08-02-2005, 06:17 PM | #30 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 210 HP but only 143 Torque???
Well, I'm not quite an executive, but when I saw the RSX and KNEW it was a Civic but better looking, higher performing, and with nicer features, I wanted it. And I was considering Audis.
I heard a lot more good experiences with Honda/Acura than I did with Audi, VW or Saab. Sure, a lot of kids rice them out, but people do crap to all kinds of cars. |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|