Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
288 GTO | F40 | F50 | Enzo Ferrari's greatest super cars. |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
10-10-2003, 04:51 AM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Filthadelphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
|
|
10-10-2003, 11:58 AM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
But does it come with a pair of driving shoes that match the interior like the Zonda?
__________________
My dream, feel free to donate some money to help |
|
10-10-2003, 01:00 PM | #3 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
Oh please. That's so
|
|
10-11-2003, 01:33 PM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
I'm not a big fan of this car because of its engine. The original prototype supposedly had a 3.8 V12 with 550bhp @ 9000rpm. That to me would have been much more interesting than a Ford V8....
|
|
10-20-2003, 10:04 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bah, that clunker is no match for...the Enzo, not with that... tractor engine.
|
|
10-21-2003, 03:04 AM | #6 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
F'kin diesel
|
|
10-21-2003, 05:00 AM | #7 | |
STREET RACING GURU
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
oh, but i beg to differ sir, just reading evo as they compared the koenigsegg vs enzo vs zonda, evo stated "for raw gut-churning accelerative fury, enigmatic image and stylistic originality, the koenigsegg is king"
hmm, lets drop some stats shall we koenigsegg 655bhp 553lbs ft 0-60 3.3 max speed 240 enzo 650bhp 585lb ft 0-60 3.5 top speed 217mph |
|
10-22-2003, 07:11 PM | #8 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
Quote:
__________________
*Under Construction - New sig to debut* |
||
10-23-2003, 12:38 AM | #9 | |
STREET RACING GURU
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
you know the problem with posting figures is that everyone looks at different resources, those specs came straight out of evo magazine.
as they tested, the koenigsegg hurt the enzo in speed. but i agree with you on the other stuff |
|
10-23-2003, 02:24 PM | #10 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Belfast
Posts: 18
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Evo tested the Enzo at 3.4 0-60 in an earlier edition. And Ferrari's own website says 485 lb/ft. I doubt they would get it wrong.
In that article they also said that the Enzo had the least steering feel and feedback. I thought that was quite interesting. |
|
10-23-2003, 03:19 PM | #11 | |
STREET RACING GURU
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 6,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
yeah, and all in all, the guy said he would rather have the enzo rather than the other 2.
i like the enzo better, but still looking at the specs and 1 guy driving both cars and saying that it was clearly beating the enzo in speed, kinda makes me think, maybe it is faster. 242mph top speed, just to beat the F1 0-60 in 3.3. .... i don't know. |
|
10-25-2003, 01:55 AM | #12 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I've read the article many times. Never does he say the Koenigsegg is faster. Also when a car mag doesn't have their own test data they very rarely look to another publications info. They just quote from the manufacturer.
The Enzo has been tested: 0-60 3.3/3.14(motortrend extrapolation*) 0-100: 6.6 1/4 mile: 11.1/10.8(*) The Koenigsegg has never actually gotten the numbers they claim. The best acceleration test was by topgear. 0-60: 3.7 0-100: 8.1 0-150: 16.6 in comparison the Enzo does 0-150 in 13.1 seconds which was done by autocar which is currently one of the Enzo's slowest tests. As for the lack of driving feel that is completely unique to this article. Other magazines Car, R&T, C&D all say that it has incredible feel at any appreciable speed. Maybe it had to do with the wetness in the article.
__________________
What shortened day? |
|
10-17-2005, 07:31 AM | #13 | ||
AF Newbie
|
Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
I know this is a late response, but might I just say that that CC8S is cheaper than an Enzo, even the CCR is, and the CCR is dramatically faster than the enzo
Quote:
|
||
10-31-2005, 06:36 PM | #14 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Flo' Park, New York
Posts: 693
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i think the Koenigsegg is faster in a straight line, because it has 655 hp in a 2500 lb car, where as the Enzo weighs just over 3100 lbs and pulls 667
__________________
|
|
02-16-2006, 06:31 PM | #15 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sville, Tennessee
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Koenigsegg vs. Enzo
Who cares how fast the cars are in a straight line, or what the completely useless top speed figure they claim to be able to hit is? What matters is lap times - something Ferrari is historically dominant at.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|