Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Corvette |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-23-2001, 01:01 PM | #31 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
stupid photopoint
Quote:
I just got my hardtop for my S2000...I will have to post some links...it looks pretty cool.
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
07-23-2001, 03:50 PM | #32 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 700
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
sounds awesome!!
|
|
07-23-2001, 04:23 PM | #33 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
thanks...
Quote:
here is a pict of my car. I will post some picts with the hardtop later.
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
07-23-2001, 04:56 PM | #34 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: -
Posts: 910
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Use www.imagestation.com it allows linking and its free.
|
|
07-23-2001, 05:54 PM | #35 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
a couple of picts of my S2000 w/hardtop
Hope you guys like em...i think they look pretty cool!
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
|
08-01-2001, 08:18 AM | #36 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
m3s and vettes
ok, first of all, road and track called the m3 a "sports car" because it IS a sports car. you're trying to tell me that a car with a straight six, that produces 333 horse and gets 0-60 times under 5 seceonds isn't a sports car? are stupid or just mildy retarded? also, you like the 3 series bmws? well, that's great and all, but the m3 isn't a 3 series, it's an m series, which might explain why it produces more horse power per cylinder than the inefficient z06. and as for those who say there is no way an m3 can compete with a vette, it is competing with the vette! it's as clear as day! with all the articles that read headlines like "m3s versus corvettes versus 911s", the "versus" part simple means a competition, morons. oh, and as for the comment that said the vette was meant to take on the viper - ha ha. that's funny, really it is. the viper produces 0-60 times of 2.9 seconds, the vette can't even brake 4 (probably not even 4.5)! your logic is the equivalent of a 7 year old child with down-syndrome! i could go on for days about your pathetic argument that vettes are better than m3s, but the holes in your "stories" are too numerous to name. finally, let me leave you with this thought, "90% of chevys are still on the road... the other 10% made it home".
|
|
08-01-2001, 10:30 AM | #37 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: m3s and vettes
Quote:
Even this viper, which has 500 HP runs a 4.0 0-60. http://www.motortrend.com/april99/viper/viper_f.html Read it yourself.
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
08-01-2001, 10:55 AM | #38 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: m3s and vettes
Quote:
|
||
08-01-2001, 11:40 AM | #39 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: m3s and vettes
Quote:
I forgot...0-60 is the only measure of speed. The Z06 does 0-100 it is closer to 2 secs faster. Also, the venom viper is at this page: http://maxpages.com/viperhome/1998_D...ssey_Venom_600 runs 0-60 in 3.7. The venom 650R runs 3.3, but none of these cars are factory cars. The venom 800 TT runs 2.4 0-60 with slicks and 1/4 9.9, what is your point?? So which 2.9 sec car are you talking about? http://www.multimania.com/t2j/viper/specveno.htm Henessey is bringing out a 900 HP TT version of the Z06 later and a 427 (engine size not HP) version of it...I wonder how fast it will run. Or go look at the c4 sledgehammer...top speed 255mph (radar clocked) and 0-60 right around 3 secs. These are not factory cars....get out of fairy land. My point is still the same. You are magazine racer who has probably never driven anything faster then a pinto in his life. Grow up. Before you call someone a moron...maybe you should have some thing base it on. Everything in your post was like...vettes suck, bmw's rule...that is a great argument. Man, I sure am glad HS is starting up again...we can get rid of these guys!!
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
08-01-2001, 12:09 PM | #40 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: m3s and vettes
Quote:
|
||
08-01-2001, 01:00 PM | #41 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: -
Posts: 910
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
sfisher, shape up will you. Lose the attitude. I probably would have deleted your post if Z06lover hadn't shown you up nicely.
And why bring the whole horse power per liter/cylinder argument in here? I thought only ricers used that. There is a reason for the Corvette's high-ish displacement, torque and potential. The BMW is probably very close to its NA output potential. And if you want to talk about efficient engines compare the two cars fuel economy. They are very close I'd imagine - despite the BMWs fewer cylinders and lower displacement. |
|
08-01-2001, 01:02 PM | #42 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: m3s and vettes
Quote:
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
08-01-2001, 01:05 PM | #43 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: spring, Texas
Posts: 151
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
I don't even know what his post was about. All I saw were made up stats and completely biased opinons about cars he has never and will never drive....bizarre. Where do these guys come from????
__________________
Sigs SUCK! |
||
08-01-2001, 01:33 PM | #44 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: -
Posts: 910
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
lol I guess I should have ignored him after seeing his Viper stats.
|
|
08-04-2001, 09:32 PM | #45 | |
Oldie
|
sfisher is an......idiot
0-60 in 2.9, yeah, sure. Also, the M3 got .89g's, the vette got 1 full g or ear-bleeding grip. Also, a lingenfelter TT vette (not even Z06) went 226 mph, with a Zo6 as a start, bored and stroked to 427.6 (or .8) inches, with tt's, theres 900+ hp, and probably 280 mph. The little M3 with a monster blower, maybe 700hp and 200 mph. PEANUTS! HAHAHAHAHA And MT got the vette to 60 in 4.24 seconds, and the 2002 is supposed to go in "under 4 seconds" Ferraris beware!! PS. zo6lover, your car looks extra good with the roof. Sorry to learn that the Comptech blower barely increases acceleration. It creates a bog em or burn em situation. If you put on some bigger rubber, you might see some improvement in your spinal compression (something not experienced in sfishers pinto):silly2:
__________________
You can live in a car, but you can't drive a house!! MSN: carnut16@hotmail.com |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|