Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
11-28-2001, 09:56 AM | #16 | ||
AF Regular
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris Allen (North San Deago.) 96 200SX GTIR Powerd 497WHP on C16 351WHP on 91 oct pump gas - 92 Sentra SE-R Almost stock - 91 NX2000 SR20VE VVL Powered 177WHP almost stock (Girlfriends Car) |
||
11-28-2001, 02:23 PM | #17 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
F20C 6 Psi Stock internals 350hp F20C 8 Psi Head Gasket Change 400hp There is a guy who bore and stroke his engine to 2.2L and He plans on adding Speedcraft Turbo as well. I am still waiting to see his output from the increase displacement are. Go to S2Ki and search for Speedcraft Turbo if you don't believe me. Mark Basch's SC for NSX C30A makes 370RWHP on stock internals @ 6PSI. |
||
11-28-2001, 03:14 PM | #18 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,770
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
11-28-2001, 11:44 PM | #19 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Yes the numbers are correct. |
||
11-29-2001, 02:48 AM | #20 | |
Master Connector
|
hp is bhp for people to lazy to type the b.
It dosnt matter if its measured at the crank or the wheels. Ok its like this, Honda makes some of the worlds best Natural asperiated motors, and has done for some time, infact thier whole philosophy seems to be geared around it. While Nissan on the other hand make some nice N/A motors, and ONE high hp N/A engine, that is very rare and nothing more than a one off. But they do make some of the worlds best Turbo charged engines, and next to BMW the worlds best the I6 engine. Honda still leads the world with mass produced variable lift and timing engines, and should do since they have a 10year lead over everybody else.
__________________
Connecting the Auto Enthusiasts
|
|
11-29-2001, 03:43 AM | #21 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ramstein AB
Posts: 1,240
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Nicely put. It's hard to get people to understand that each automaker has their own thing, and sometimes they are impossible to compare. For instance, most enthusiasts love both the feel of a high-powered turbocharged vehicle, AS WELL AS a free-revving naturally aspirated motor. It's like comparing Coke to 7-UP, instead of Coke to Pepsi.
And bhp is brake horsepower, the amount of force needed to stop the wheel--as in flywheel/crankshaft, etc. |
|
11-29-2001, 07:57 AM | #22 | ||
AF Regular
|
Quote:
Not on a stock computer. your talking about all kinds of stuff that needs to be done to support that HP. And I find it hard to beleave you will get another 50 HP with 2 more PSI and lowering the static comprestion. your dynamic comprestion if at all will only be slightly higher IF that.
__________________
Chris Allen (North San Deago.) 96 200SX GTIR Powerd 497WHP on C16 351WHP on 91 oct pump gas - 92 Sentra SE-R Almost stock - 91 NX2000 SR20VE VVL Powered 177WHP almost stock (Girlfriends Car) |
||
11-29-2001, 08:30 AM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,770
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Not to get off topic but bhp is brake horsepower, yes, but it's hp measured on a brake dyno. Typcially if you just talk about hp or bhp on a car you talk about it on the crank/flywheel.
There are still chassis brake dynos that measure at the wheels but you should really state at the wheels as most people assume you're talking about flywheel/crank hp otherwise. The most common chassis dyno is the inertial dyno, which uses a drum or drums with a known weight and calculate the torque based on the time needed to accellerate the drum to different speeds. Sorry for getting off topic. |
|
12-02-2001, 03:03 AM | #24 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Blue is Comptech Supercharger. 6psi with everything stock. Red is Speedcraft Turbo. 6.5 Psi with everything stock. |
||
12-06-2001, 07:17 AM | #25 | |
AF Fanatic
|
um... Hondas dont necessarily need an ECU upgrade to boost.
Nissans do in that respect... JWT will reprogram so your car reads boost and timing can be adjusted accordingly since they're all directfire ignitions. ok folks, why not compare two similar platforms... the CA18DE and the B18C? same displacement. |
|
12-06-2001, 10:06 AM | #26 | |||
AF Regular
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hows that for compairison. But you can't compair a CA18DE from the early 80's to a up to date B18C. That is not even a close to compair.
__________________
Chris Allen (North San Deago.) 96 200SX GTIR Powerd 497WHP on C16 351WHP on 91 oct pump gas - 92 Sentra SE-R Almost stock - 91 NX2000 SR20VE VVL Powered 177WHP almost stock (Girlfriends Car) |
|||
12-08-2001, 04:54 AM | #27 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ramstein AB
Posts: 1,240
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I have to second that about the CA18DE not being a righteous conteder for the comparo. Not only was it lacking variable valve timing, and being seriously aged, but it was the true developing predecessor of the SR engine, which we all know was Nissan's starting point for serious turbocharged four cylinder performance. The CA18DET was, no, IS still great for blown power. The DE motors were not meant for that naturally aspirated fury. And as stated before, the VE powerplants are much more accoutered for the task.
|
|
12-08-2001, 05:55 AM | #28 | |
Aussie Mod
|
Screw both of them and fit a SR20-DET. mmmmm....more boost...:frog:
|
|
12-08-2001, 03:04 PM | #29 | |
Skyline Man
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Show me state, Missouri
Posts: 4,800
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I watched this thead and it is interesting on how it went from an N/A comparaison to turbo'ed, supercharged bla bla bla.
Chris the GTI-R motor is a Nissan Motorsports motor to start with you can't use that in the comparison. That is apples to oranges. It was developed as a rally engine with forged pistons, quad throttle bodies, larger 550 cc injectors the works. Both motors compared have their pros and cons. If you want to go all out and call the best jap motor ever produced then look no further than the RB series, or the Q45 series V-8's. Nissan has had it all over in the rest in the forced induction competition, until you get into the new F1 Toyota is doing. But again that is not a mass produced engine for general car sales.
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them |
|
12-10-2001, 12:53 AM | #30 | ||
AF Regular
|
Quote:
GTIR INFO AS FOLLOWED! The GTi-R has oil squirter piston coolers The GTi-R has a bigger oil pump. The GTi-R has a different front pulley. The GTi-R has a water cooled oil cooler. The GTi-R has lower compression pistons (8.3:1 vs 8.5:1) found in the BlueBird and Silvia motors. Lower comprestion is due to the cylender head is a bit more open. The GTi-R has 444cc Top fed injectors. The GTi-R has mechanical shims and solid lifters with a slightly bigger in duration exhaust cam. The GTi-R has individual Throttle body injection. The GTi-R DET has stronger main cap bolts. The GTi-R DET has stronger head bolts bolts 12mm vs Silvia's and Bluebirds are 10mm along with all SR20DE motors. The GTi-R DET has beefier rods. 2nd of all. I wasn't compairing SR20DET motors to N/A Honda motors. The most even compairison is the SR16VE and B16A motor. PS: We swapped in a SR20VE motor for the 1st time with a few bolt ons (Intake,Exhaust,Header) into a 91 Sentra and ran it at the track 1/4 mile and it ended up posting a pretty impressive 13.7@100 mph on its 1st time out.
__________________
Chris Allen (North San Deago.) 96 200SX GTIR Powerd 497WHP on C16 351WHP on 91 oct pump gas - 92 Sentra SE-R Almost stock - 91 NX2000 SR20VE VVL Powered 177WHP almost stock (Girlfriends Car) |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|