Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
06-15-2004, 01:55 PM | #1 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Hey guys I have a question for you all. I have a set of 3998920 heads and I was wondering if they were worth my while to go ahead and machine these with larger valves, porting, etc? I have read in one book saying that chevy heads with the larger 76cc chambers are trash while in another they are worth while working on. This confuses me and was wondering if anyone could shine some light on this dilema. Thanks for any info you can give me.
|
|
06-15-2004, 03:04 PM | #2 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
That may be a casting number of a head that is prone to cracking, possibly that is why people are telling you that they are junk. The older 1974 and earlier cylinder heads are worth working on because they are much stronger castings that almost never break. The newer casting bust alot eaiser and alot more often. As far as the combustion chamber is concerned, if you are running a 350 stock engine a 76cc combustion chamber will work fine. If you want some power out of the engine you will want to run 9 to 1 Compression ratio and up. This increases your engines ability to rev and get the extra top end horsepower. What size engine are you running? How much power do you want out of it?
|
|
06-15-2004, 03:19 PM | #3 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
What I do know about the heads is that they made them from 72-74. They are 1.94in and 1.5ex. I have a 350 that I am going to beef up to run about 425hp and about 440ftlbs. I just heard the combustion characteristics were bad in the open style chambers. Thanks. Oh yeah I have a 73 Camaro too! Awesome choice!!!!!
|
|
06-15-2004, 03:41 PM | #4 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2004, 03:52 AM | #5 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Lol. I know what I am going to do if these are not worth while. If these are not worth my time I plan on working with a set of vortec heads. I am looking at some on ebay that have been redone with new 2.02in and 1.6ex, bronze guides, new springs, bowl hogged, etc. I may even get some camel humps, just got to deal with lack of accessory holes. I am trying to keep the rebuild under $2000. I am doing so cause I had a 402BBC that I had rebuilt for that much that would have produced similar numbers to what I want. Thanks for any more advise you can give me .
|
|
06-16-2004, 10:00 AM | #6 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2004, 10:03 AM | #7 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2004, 01:32 PM | #8 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: La, California
Posts: 385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
get the #062 casting!!! or dont get ne
i got a pair of #906 there just papper wieghts to me till i get some cash |
|
06-16-2004, 01:56 PM | #9 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Yeah that is what I thought. I knew the 920 heads were not very good and that the vortecs would be superior. Pretty much everything I know of what to do with heads comes from John Ligenfelter's book on SBCs. That book was written just before vortecs were around. He too talked about how bigger valves aren't neccessarily better. What I have had in mind is a motor similar to CHPs Impersonator motor that pulled 428hp with 525fllbs with nothing more then new springs, a .480" lift 230 degrees of duration with 109 degree lobe separation. single profile cam, and some more little goodies. It was a 406SBC, so I am not expecting to get exact torque numbers out of my 350.
|
|
06-16-2004, 03:26 PM | #10 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sparks, Nevada
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
Quote:
|
||
06-16-2004, 03:45 PM | #11 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
If I were to get Vortecs what would all should I do to them before installing them? I would just assume new springs so I could go beyond .500" lift. Do they need new keepers, retainers, etc?
|
|
06-16-2004, 04:56 PM | #12 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: La, California
Posts: 385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
the differnce between 906 and 062 castings are teh 906 were used on work trucks they have like 15% less flow the exhause seats are hardend so you cant port them and they just dont flow nearly as good as a the 062's 062 were the proformance ones , altho the 906's are still good casting just not for all out proformance
|
|
06-16-2004, 05:37 PM | #13 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Modesto, California
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
so what casting comes from GM perfromance parts for the vortec heads?
|
|
06-16-2004, 07:08 PM | #14 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: La, California
Posts: 385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
man just google it vortec + 062 vs 906 or somet hing i read this stuff along time ago so i dont wanna try to quote anyone , its really not hard , hotrodder.com those forums had enough info if i remmeber right
http://hotrodders.com/showthread.php...ght=vortec+062 http://hotrodders.com/search.php?act...der=descending |
|
04-19-2018, 10:51 PM | #15 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Myakka City, Florida
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Bad Head Casting Numbers?
This is @ 73'Camaro .
In this conversation you stated that if this guy needed help with a build you had some ideas and at a Budget. I was wondering if this offer was a open door policy? I'm building a ski boat 350 vortec motor , Stock bore, 906 heads Cam/roller lifters (???) Intake (???) Carb (???) Exaust fresh pickup 'Salt water" Stock Alpha 1 out drive. I'm thinking power range between 1500-5500 RPMS I'd like to have a brain storming about Wich path I might consider.... Thanks Rick (lilld) |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|