Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
03-03-2009, 10:13 AM | #1 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BELTON, Missouri
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Intake manifold comparison
I have several edelbrock manifolds to chose from that i am considering for my "86" Silverado 305/4bbl with a 700r4 trans & 273 rear gear. #1 ia SP2P which is suppose to be great for lowend torque, @ low rpm. #2 manifold is edelbrock performer #2101. Both manifolds are non egr. dual plane,spreadbores. The truck is a daily driver, mostly hiway miles. The truck could use some more grunt on the highway especially on long grades. Needs help to keep it from downshifting so much.
I had an Edelbrick SP2P on a 72 Cheyenne/c20/350 several years ago. Seemed to help the torque level back then. The way my present truck is configured, so highly geared, which manifold would be the best? SP2P? PERFORMER, Keep it stock? THANKS for any comments. NOVAZ27 |
|
03-03-2009, 11:33 AM | #2 | |
Professional Ninja Killer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Penn Hills, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: Intake manifold comparison
Both of those manifolds are very similar. I would stick to the SP2P. It has slightly smaller runners which would choke off at higher RPMs on a larger motor, but the cam and compression in that 86 305 are so small that they run out of breath at 4800 rpms anyway. Best to match the intake with the powerband of the rest of the engine.
Performer would have a power band of about 1000-6000 on a 305. The SP2P would be more like idle-5500. Most of the advertised powerbands are based on a 350 so you have to realize that the smaller motor will shift the powerbands up a bit. I'd go with the SP2P. Good manifold back then, still good now.
__________________
Dragging people kicking and screaming into the enlightenment. |
|
03-03-2009, 02:47 PM | #3 | |
AF Regular
Thread starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BELTON, Missouri
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: Intake manifold comparison
Thanks for the quick reply. The sp2p is the manifold i was leaning towards. I just wanted some other input/s. My next quest is to open the exhaust up some on this truck. But that would have be on another thread.
Af has a wealth of knowledge. So spread the wealth. Novaz27
__________________
CURRENT VEHICLES "84" CAPRICE "86" SILVERADO "06" GRANDPRIX GT VEHICLES IN LIMBO "69" NOVA SS "72" CHEYENNE CUSTOM CAMPER "80" CITATION "85" SAFARI |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|