 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
07-08-2004, 12:29 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: manassas, Virginia
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
can a 1991 mustang 5.0 GT manuel beat a 1999 mustang GT manuel in a 1/4 drag race. both bone stock
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2004, 02:46 AM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Stuart, Florida
Posts: 1,545
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
manual.
__________________
I'm the greatest! |
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2004, 03:22 AM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
Both bone stock? Nope, 99 GT should walk it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2004, 06:01 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
Stang Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
Quote:
I concur
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people... 
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-08-2004, 10:40 PM
|
#5 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lindenhurst, New York
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
But how many "Bone Stock" 5.0's are there, lol. I know... everyone says theirs is, but usually it's not. Some people I know consider "bone stock" not touching the enigne, so they can have 3.73s, headers back exhaust, upgraded clutch, but still are "stock".
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-08-2004, 11:27 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
That's true, but I'm sure the guy knows this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 01:02 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Stang Guy
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hey mine is bone-stock. I swear......
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 11:14 AM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver / Guadalajara Mex
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
5.0 mustangs completely stock are slow, slow as a Kia spectra. Not kidding.
They go in the 9s 0-60 mph. A friend has a bone stock one, and he get walked by the cheapest car in mexico, a chevrolet chevy, thats what its called, 1.6 liter producing 80 horsepower on a light chassi.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 01:35 PM
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
Uh...no. My friend had a 1988 Mustang GT, bone stock, and he quarter-miled at 15 seconds flat...they're not THAT slow...
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 03:58 PM
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lindenhurst, New York
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
Don't they have something like 300lb. of torque, I've seen stock ones, and they are pretty damn fast. I raced a stock one, and I didn't have a decisive advantage til 3rd. I have an 02 Camaro z28
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 06:06 PM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
225 hp, 300 ft-lb of torque, curb weight about 3000 lbs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 07:35 PM
|
#12 | ||
|
Stang Guy
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
Quote:
0-60mph in 9 seconds.... come on......... 
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
||
|
|
|
|
07-09-2004, 11:55 PM
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
He must be thinking of the N/A 2.3 'Stangs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2004, 01:10 PM
|
#14 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver / Guadalajara Mex
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 5.0 vs 99 GT 4.6
No Im not thinking of the 4cyl mustangs. My friend which lives 1 minute away from me has a GT, and I swear to god, he doesent see the quarter mile line in less than 18.5 seconds, maybe his engine is fucked up.
BTW im in Mexico GDL (5440 ft above sea level) that would equal a 17.0 flat at sea level.
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures)
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-10-2004, 03:19 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Stang Guy
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Even some of the most hardend believe Mustangs are slow poeple her e on AF would even agree a 5.0 Stang if running on all cylinders will pull a 16second 1/4 mile.
Just cause your friend has one dead beat ass 5.0 your gonna base your opinion on that...
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world has lost one of the truly wonderful people...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
