Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Suburban
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
View Poll Results: Old model or New model
1999 model low miles 34 58.62%
2000 model low miles 24 41.38%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2003, 08:11 PM   #1
don@cyberhotline.c
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Old model verses new model

I am looking to buy a Suburban.
Low miles are the most important consideration.
Should I get a 1998 / 1999?
OR
Should I get a 2000 / 2001?

Which one would you get? The old model or new model?
don@cyberhotline.c is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 01:29 PM   #2
stu1435
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
98/99

- Better track record... less smog stuff... better aftermarket (big brakes, wheels, lifts, grilles) yada yada yada

- Stu :twoguns:
stu1435 is offline  
Old 05-15-2003, 01:52 PM   #3
DMC12
DeLorean Guy
 
DMC12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hazard, Kentucky
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Don, how is the Sub doing so far?
__________________
SOLID! crew (circa 2002).
DeLorean moderator.
DMC12 is offline  
Old 06-18-2003, 07:53 PM   #4
blackbob
AF Regular
 
blackbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 402
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to blackbob Send a message via AIM to blackbob Send a message via MSN to blackbob Send a message via Yahoo to blackbob
Talking

Quote:
Originally posted by stu1435
98/99

- Better track record... less smog stuff... better aftermarket (big brakes, wheels, lifts, grilles) yada yada yada

- Stu :twoguns:
Of course wich one has been around longer......DUH !!

Anyway on the real dude. The older one's not only look better well they perform better in my opinion and you can look at them and know you see a saburban not a spaceship like the Danali or the new blazer. Just my .02's

~BB~
__________________
RogueRacing
"Dare to be different"
SHIFT_imagination
blackbob is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 12:22 PM   #5
Silentwarrior
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Not only does the older style look better, they sure are alot cheaper, they want 40 some grand for a brand new one these days!
Silentwarrior is offline  
Old 07-15-2003, 04:30 PM   #6
stu1435
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lightbulb OLDER

I think you should get a wicked old suburban - 72,73,74 or 84,85,86,87, or 91. Pimp it out with a new engine/tranny/interior/paint/soundsystem/suspension/wheels&tires....

You'd still spend less money than a 2 year old truck that was bone stock. Take my word on this...

- STU
__________________
stu1435 is offline  
Old 07-27-2003, 03:08 PM   #7
don@cyberhotline.c
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Went with a 1999 K2500

The truck was highly modified before I bought it and was going to "flip" it for a dandy profit but the wife said no. Really a fun truck and it quiet downs around 80. Cruises real nice and the 285 / 60 / 18 are fun in the mud. I feel like I am riding in an amusement park water ride on rails.
Have about 4000 miles on it ad it is fun. I think the 1999 's have more room over the newer models with the exception of the spare tire.
don@cyberhotline.c is offline  
Old 01-15-2004, 06:56 AM   #8
CalessaSSracer
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LAS VEGAS, Nevada
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Old model verses new model

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silentwarrior
Not only does the older style look better, they sure are alot cheaper, they want 40 some grand for a brand new one these days!
i got my 98 for those reasons Silent
CalessaSSracer is offline  
Old 01-15-2004, 09:32 AM   #9
back2life
AF Regular
 
back2life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: indpls., Indiana
Posts: 257
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Old model verses new model

i have only a 94 model but all the options in it only big problem i have is slow shifting and it drinks gas like it is free, i have music,clean paint and 20's
much better than the newer i was going to get for 30 something thousand,hell i just wanted the space!
back2life is offline  
Old 01-17-2004, 06:21 PM   #10
Dr. Eagle
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks like I am the odd man out here. I absolutely believe that the new years is far superior in most departments than the old ones. I have owned both by the way...

Advantages of the older style:

Looks good, not sure it is really "better" (that seems to be a matter of taste or opinion)
more room inside (14" as I remember)
thicker skinned body panels
lots more aftermarket stuff
larger gas tank



disadvantages:
Engines are gutless I had the 5.7 in the old one (I have the 8.1 in the new one)
Transmission was weak and didn't have an external cooler (went through one in 125K)
Rear ends were weak as hell (went through 3 in same, not to mention 2 sets of axles because the bearing surfaces flaked off).
Brakes totally suck...rear drums were useless
Electrical gremlins on MY old one cost me a battery/alternator combo per year
Ride sucks compared to the autoride
Fuel economy is no where near as good

In any case this is IMHO, just my .02, and as a result of my experience all of that good stuff....
While I really do miss the space................that's just about it.
Dr. Eagle is offline  
Old 06-14-2004, 06:20 PM   #11
SchellSchock
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree with Dr. Eagle.....

I owned a 86 1/2 Ton 4x4... went thru it 100%- Tricked out the 5.7 new Heads, cam, total seal rings, blueprinted yada-yada, Painted it same colors as Boat to look cool. Three months later, rear end grenaded, new Eaton and, 2 months later Tranny, new tricked out one & 2 months later transfer case replaced it and front differential. Next month made 2 trips from Southern California to Lake MEAD pulling a 4000# boat and 2nd gear, 40 mph up the grades sucks. Sold it cheap bought a 03 8.1 and life is good. Rides like a Caddy, pulls like a Mule, color dosen't match Boat but what ya' goona' do. I love it. New ones are better all around than the old ones at least IMHO
SchellSchock is offline  
Old 09-21-2004, 11:14 PM   #12
TXAGG05
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 138
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I know this is an old post,...but I couldn't resist. GO OLDER! The 98/99 Suburbans are by far my favorite car on the road. When I bought my new truck I was looking at '99 LT 4x4s, but ended up getting a brand new pick-up because I drive a lot of miles and the sub would have 100k miles on it by now even if I bought it with only 40. Plus as a gift from my old man he helped pay the difference for a new pick-up without leather so I could start with 0 miles. The 98/99 subs still turn my head though. I really like seeing a clean, stock 1/2 ton 4x4 LT with the fender flares and a nice young mom driving!
Jeb

Also, my uncle has a 98 3/4 ton 4x4 LT with 150k on it which he uses as a daily driver and a work truck down on our duck lease(it has really been abused). Six years of salt and mud, but she still cleans up nice. Everything works like clockwork except for the wipers(I think he needs a new relay)
__________________
2002 Chevy Z71 Ext Cab, Black
2004 Blue Wave 180-V, 90hp Yamaha Outboard
Pre 1960 Duck Boat, 9hp Mercury Outboard
2002 Argo Conquest w/ tracks
Also driving, but not at my house:
2001 Pierce Saber
1989 Pierce Dash
(See Pics in my gallery)
TXAGG05 is offline  
Old 09-24-2004, 07:54 PM   #13
CoolBlue87GT
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: CoolBlue87GT@comcast.net, Florida
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Old model verses new model

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silentwarrior
Not only does the older style look better, they sure are alot cheaper, they want 40 some grand for a brand new one these days!
I like the new models also.

Just picked up an 04 model w/ only 8,000 miles. Paid 26,500 !!

There are some good deals out there.

The same Suburban new on the lot, with the same options, goes for 47,500 !! So, I got one hell of a deal.

CoolBlue87GT is offline  
Old 09-26-2004, 04:10 AM   #14
simba323
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bako, California
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to simba323
I really like both models, but I like the newer one much more along with all the new gadgets that GM has with it now days.
simba323 is offline  
Old 10-07-2004, 05:25 PM   #15
tim1950
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Posts: 128
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Old model verses new model

I have a 1964 and I love it. 300HP 327 with 350TH trans.
tim1950 is offline  
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Avalanche | C&K | Silverado | Suburban | Tahoe > Suburban


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts