Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
04-10-2006, 09:04 AM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
With globalisation I don't think anything will come from anywhere anymore.
You'll have a car deigned in europe, built in asia, marketed in america and iconed in australia.....and what's wrong with that, it will be the most efficiently built and used car ever.
__________________
Rob |
|
04-10-2006, 04:05 PM | #17 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Issaquah, Washington
Posts: 927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Quote:
__________________
'99 GSX, 5-speed, 60k miles: Greddy filter / RRE uicp / 1g bov / Autometer boost gauge / Injen-copy intake / Megan DP (not installed) Coming soon! Thx to Blackcrow & nova1313! http://dsm-one.org/ Adopt pets in need! http://www.petfinder.com/ |
||
04-10-2006, 05:12 PM | #18 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Those charts aren't the be-all-end-all of automotive reliability; they're just good guidelines. One important thing to note, though, is that the Japanese brands are at the very top of both.
Going back to the "country of origin" debate, it's important to note that although a brand's country of origin may not have anything to do with where their cars (or the parts that go in them) are actually produced, it's still up to the brand to monitor the quality of the parts being used in their vehicles, decide who makes/assembles those parts, and create a suitable and productive working environment in their factories. One rule of any company is that the attitude of the employees towards the job will always reflect that of the higher-ups. The management in the Japanese companies is simply more disclipined and professional than that of the American or European companies, and that's why their cars end up being built so much better.
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. |
|
04-10-2006, 07:24 PM | #19 | ||
Scuderia Kimi
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Quote:
To say that Japanese companies are better disciplined and more professional is one of the most misinformed things I have ever heard. Yet again, I will point my finger at Mitsubishi, who is losing money very quickly and is quite probably headed towards bankruptcy. Overgeneralization absolutely kills your arguements. While I suppose you could say that Toyota/Lexus is "professional and disciplined" (or completely soulless) please stop saying that ALL Japanese cars are good cars, because they arn't. Subaru, Mitsu, and Nissan are all riding on the coattails of companies that have become of Japan's auto industry. The problem with the CS and JD reliability surveys lies in peoples expectations of the cars they buy. People have grown not to expect as much from a Mercury or Buick, so they are less likely to take them in to fix smaller things like a visor light not working etc. People expect alot from brands like Mercedes-Benz and Audi, so they will take cars in to fix almost everything that goes wrong. There is a massive difference in equipment in a modern luxury car compared to a regular car that isn't reflected well by these surveys. Compare the standard features and options in a Toyota Yaris to a BMW 5-Series. Things like the traction control and IDrive in a 5-Series are much newer technology then anything in the Yaris, and thus are more likely to go wrong. I have endless respect for Lexus' ability to be at the top despite its features list, but one shouldn't look down on Mercedes and Audi as much as JD Powers shows. Another problem can be seen in that the JD Powers survey only lists problems per 100 vehicles, but not the cost of the problem. For all we know, every single Lexus engine block could be snapping in half, but because they don't have lots of little electronic problems they might rank better then Land Rover who could have flawless engines, but might have lots of little inexpensive problems (disclaimer, I'm not saying this example is necessarily true). Finally, labeling reliability by company presents another problem in that not all of a company's cars will be equally reliable. Many of BMW's reliability problems stem from the IDrive systems in the 5, 6, and 7-Series. I would be willing to bet that if you only looked at the 3-Series (without IDrive), it would rank closer the average of Infiniti.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
||
04-10-2006, 08:20 PM | #20 | |
Here for the pussy, man.
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
All that the JD Power chart shows me is that no matter what car you own, on average, you're going to have a problem and it's unknown whether the problem'll be major or minor.
Even if you own a Land Rover or Kia you're only going to have 1 or 2 more problems than the owner of a Lexus. Seems like a waste of time and easier to just conclude that every car today is reliable and that judging cars on reliability is a waste of time.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
04-10-2006, 08:40 PM | #21 | |
Razor Sharp Twit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: london
Posts: 5,863
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
am i the only one that finds that industry average there rather pointless?
i mean, shouldn't there be something more like a standard acceptible figure instead of using an average as a judge? i mean, in an ideal world, no fault is acceptible so isn't using an average as a sort of yardstick a bit well, crap? |
|
04-10-2006, 09:05 PM | #22 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pacific, Washington
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Cars today are much better than they have ever been and in general you can expect to buy any 2006 model, drive it with only scheduled maintence and expect to not have any major problems for at least a few years. However some makes and models will suffer from fewer problems over time and that sort of information is of great use to people that don't want to have to think about their cars at all.
Also, you have to remember that much of the industry averages and comparisons are for the manufacturers, to be used as marketing tools. As for the zero tolerance to defects rule, well, as stated in an ideal world that would be great. But given the shear amount of parts and complexity in your average modern car, something is bound to go wrong. After that, it's just about how long and how much to fix it and who's paying.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
04-11-2006, 12:22 AM | #23 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Quote:
However, you know as well as I do that car buying is an emotional experience. I love Japan, and I love the vehicles that they produce. You obviously love European engineering. I can tell by the way you talk about the brands that use it - BMW, Porsche, Volvo, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Ferrari, just to name a few. Just understand, that's the exact same way I feel about Subaru, Toyota, Mazda, Nissan, Honda, Mitsubishi, even Suzuki. No amount of factual data will make you, in your heart, LOVE Japanese cars more than European cars, and the reverse is true for me. Love can't always be justified and supported with facts; sometimes, you just feel it. So, excuse me if I'm more than a little biased towards Japan in my posts.
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. |
||
04-11-2006, 12:34 AM | #24 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Issaquah, Washington
Posts: 927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
A couple of things on what you said DinanM3. The CR chart I listed was problems per 100 vehicles after *five years.* So it differs slightly from the JD Power chart. Also the CR chart does not just list an entire company's reliability without also listing all of it's model's reliability too. I will try to scan the CR charts but the one I was talking about had a bar for each manufacturer that represented all of it's models. Then it had an average model mark within each company's bar, and then an industry average. So it's a bit more informative than the JD Power one.
While you're right that the severity and cost of the problem are not accounted for in these surveys, CR does have a section that lists reliablity for every model by year (98-05) with different areas like "engine," "fuel," "transmission," "exhuast" and so on. So it does distinguish between the different areas of reliability or each model. If Toyotas engines were snapping in half as you were saying rather than a simple exhaust problem that would show up on the chart. When you look through all the models you are struck by something; when you get to Toyota, Honda, etc it's almost completely red (full red circle is the best, then half red, then white, then half black, then full black). When you get to, say, Mercedes more than half of all circles are in the black or white. So it gives you a very accurate picture of all manufacturer's models. And the charts come from a survey of over 1 million vehicles done by CR. Btw, the '05 5 Series does score lower than the 3 Series in the Electrical category like you were saying with the IDrive. That is a good point that people may expect more of a certain manufacturer and thus complain more. This may scew the results. But I don't think the point about technical and luxury features scewing the results is a good point. It doesn't matter why something went wrong. If there is something that goes wrong with a new 5-series IDrive system, then something went wrong with it. The car is in fact less reliable no matter why it is. And just because a car has more technical features should not mean it should be less reliable. People pay for these extra features and expect them to work. If they don't then it is the company's failing and it should reflect on the company. I also have to say that I don't think Mitsu, Nissan, and Subaru stay in business because of the reliablility stereotype of "asian" cars. These three companies just happen to make fast cars unllike Honda, Acura, Toyota (no more Supra), etc. I think people buy them because they want to go fast and I think people buy Hondas, Toyotas, etc because they want an all around good, reliable, cheap car; totally different motivations. Although it doesn't excuse their comparable unreliabilty, it it does explain it. EDIT: Here's what the charts look like, on the lower right. http://aolsvc.aol.consumerreports.or...ure/subscribe/ http://216.35.74.202/carfax/ And here's some reliability info from CR. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/c...6/overview.htm http://autos.yahoo.com/consumerrepor...s_hold_up.html
__________________
'99 GSX, 5-speed, 60k miles: Greddy filter / RRE uicp / 1g bov / Autometer boost gauge / Injen-copy intake / Megan DP (not installed) Coming soon! Thx to Blackcrow & nova1313! http://dsm-one.org/ Adopt pets in need! http://www.petfinder.com/ Last edited by Nayr747; 04-11-2006 at 01:21 AM. |
|
04-11-2006, 01:16 AM | #25 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Issaquah, Washington
Posts: 927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Quote:
Last edited by Nayr747; 04-11-2006 at 01:49 AM. |
||
04-11-2006, 04:21 AM | #26 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pacific, Washington
Posts: 2,927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Must... resist...crankwalk...joke
Ah nuts, how'd that get up there... Speaking of which though, these guys have an interesting write up on the causes of crankwalk in the 4G motor. Anyway, on topic...uh, yeah, sometimes we buy with our hearts instead of our heads. We can look at the facts and see that such and such model is made from X% parts from here or there then assembled elsewhere but to the guy in southern Montana it's Dodge truck like his dad had. The 350Z is a road going slice of the JGTC to a 17 year old kid in California despite the fact it mostly designed at the US branch. Etc and so on...I guess that was on topic.
__________________
1989 240SX Fastback. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1995 300ZX Twin Turbo Warning: Objects in mirror aren't as fast as they thought they were. |
|
04-11-2006, 11:43 AM | #27 | |
Scuderia Kimi
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Ooo ooo, I can make fun of DSMs too-
Finally-
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
04-11-2006, 01:31 PM | #28 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Quote:
__________________
My '05 Impreza 2.5 RS. |
||
04-11-2006, 06:32 PM | #29 | |
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Issaquah, Washington
Posts: 927
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
LMAO, I've never seen those things. But seriously the numbers of crankwalk victims are blown way out of proportion. Not only does it only happen to a small percentage of 4g63's, it also only happens to 7 bolt '95-98ish motors. And it can happen to any motor, but not usually in the numbers seen on 7 bolts. Miatas get it too though.
Never heard the cheap interior one. My interior seems pretty nice to me. Nothing special compared to what comes in cars today though. But its got leather, infinity stereo, power seat, power sunroof, etc. A couple of my brother's friends (who hate Mitsu, they're Honda lovers) have actually commented on how nice my interior is. And there was a ball joint recall where the boot may have been put on incorrectly at the factory allowing water/crap to get to the joint and cause it to fail. I don't know the numbers that were affected. All you have to do is take it into a dealer to get it inspected and replaced for free if it's defective. Or it's pretty simple to just look at it yourself when you doing an oil change. Mitsu isn't an anomoly for having a recall though. My mom's '98 Jeep Cherokee and new Volvo had their share too.
__________________
'99 GSX, 5-speed, 60k miles: Greddy filter / RRE uicp / 1g bov / Autometer boost gauge / Injen-copy intake / Megan DP (not installed) Coming soon! Thx to Blackcrow & nova1313! http://dsm-one.org/ Adopt pets in need! http://www.petfinder.com/ |
|
04-11-2006, 06:52 PM | #30 | |
Here for the pussy, man.
|
Re: "American" vs. "Import"
Mitsubishis are rubbish, trust me, there's enough of them back in my home country and I found some disturbing facts about them from working for Inland Revenue (They had a provision in thier books that 65% of thier cars would come back for warranty work within 12 months costing on average $1000 NZD which back in 1989 was about the equivalent of US$1200 today with inflation and exchange rate fluctuations etc).
Diamantes cook thier transmissions with relative ease, as do Automatic Galants and most of thier AWD models make easy work of blowing gearboxes. Don't even get me started on the rusty-roof syndrome or the ball-joint recall. Even Alfa Romeo soundly kick Mitsubishis ass for producing reliable motoring and frankly, that shows just how unfunny the joke that is Mitsi really is.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|