 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-03-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#1 | |
|
310s (canadian tech)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: ottawa
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
70 challenger vs 69 gto who'se faster
I say the 69 gto has it the engine has more horse if I'm wrong tell me. my wife drove a 70 challenger but doesn't believe me any thoughts?? and please no insults
|
|
|
|
|
09-03-2010, 11:43 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 778
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 70 challenger vs 69 gto who'se faster
The 1970 6 pack 440 Challenger went 0-60 in 6.2sec and the 1/4 in 13.7, the GTO Ram Air 4 did 0-60 in 5.8 but had a 1/4 time of 14.5sec.
Then the Challenger T/A 340 did 0-60 in 5.9 and a 14.5sec 1/4 mile, and then the 426 HEMI did 60 in 6.3, but it did the 1/4 mile in just 13.1 seconds. So the GTO is faster to 60 but the challengers were all as fast or faster in the 1/4, nearly 1.5sec with the super rare 426
__________________
  Quote:
   
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
