Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
240Z | 260Z| 280Z | 300ZX (Past Z Cars) The original Z cars - ones that started it all. |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
11-30-2005, 02:25 AM | #16 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: 90 n/a
$4k? that's with upgraded parts yes?
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #6 1988 300zx turbo 5spd. 3" mandrel exhaust, filter, afco rad, e-fan, poly engine mounts, mbc at 8.5 psi, turboxs rfl-h bov, gutted plenum, etc. blown turbo, under construction.. gt35 coming. |
|
11-30-2005, 02:36 AM | #17 | ||
Z Cars Fanatic
|
Re: Re: 90 n/a
Quote:
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4 |
||
11-30-2005, 12:15 PM | #18 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 90 n/a
Sure, Jason... dis the NA just 'cus you got a TT now. Remember where you came from, boy!
I never mis-lead him. It's not cost effective at all. But why not mod the NA as much as possible? It's what he got. Cost effective mods? Modding in general is stupid and a waste of money in the long run...
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
|
11-30-2005, 12:16 PM | #19 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 90 n/a
Plus: Modding an NA is the true Z Enthusiast calling!
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
|
11-30-2005, 03:59 PM | #20 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 90 n/a
lol well as much as I hate to say it, I'd stop modding an n/a after about 1K dollars worth of parts, becuase like I said earlier, you really won't hid n.e. thing better than 14s w/o nitrous
By the way guys... what are some visual differences between the 2 seater, and 2+2 seater z32 models... I can't really tell the difference, so I was hoping you guys could show me the way
__________________
Georgey on the subject of midget beastiality pornos Quote:
R.I.P Andy, you will be missed by all. |
||
11-30-2005, 05:25 PM | #21 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 90 n/a
2+2 is a little longer... you can tell after being around them awhile. On a 2+2 the fuel-door is on the side of the wheel-well closest to the rear bumper while the Coupe's is closer to the driver. Generally stock 2+2's don't have a wing I think. And if you peer inside... alas! Rear seats!
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
|
11-30-2005, 05:47 PM | #22 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 90 n/a
Quote:
VS. 2+2 As you can see the 2+2 is a little longer looking and the difference between the fuel door location... personally I would much rather have a TT 2+2 than a TT Coupe. I love the longer lines and with right fascia and wing it looks better! Plus it's better for cornering as the longer wheel-base stabilizes cornering. I'm sure Coupe owners will disagree on the looks though... BTW... I have those Siena's!
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
||
11-30-2005, 07:51 PM | #23 | ||
Banned
|
Re: Re: 90 n/a
Quote:
Cheers, Mike |
||
11-30-2005, 08:17 PM | #24 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 90 n/a
I'm assuming that they're different, becuase the difference between turbo and n/a performance is like night and day...
yea Jorgey, I do see the diff... I actually like the 2+2 a lil' better
__________________
Georgey on the subject of midget beastiality pornos Quote:
R.I.P Andy, you will be missed by all. |
||
11-30-2005, 08:56 PM | #25 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: 90 n/a
nope the plenums are the same as far as i know.. maybe with the exception of a different sensor or 2...
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #6 1988 300zx turbo 5spd. 3" mandrel exhaust, filter, afco rad, e-fan, poly engine mounts, mbc at 8.5 psi, turboxs rfl-h bov, gutted plenum, etc. blown turbo, under construction.. gt35 coming. |
|
11-30-2005, 10:05 PM | #26 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: AppleValley, California
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 90 n/a
Quote:
Yuh, I'm pretty sure the Plemums are the same... Jason may know for sure.
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
||
11-30-2005, 10:39 PM | #27 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Re: 90 n/a
tt swapped 2+2... meh... factory 2+2 tt... maybe
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #6 1988 300zx turbo 5spd. 3" mandrel exhaust, filter, afco rad, e-fan, poly engine mounts, mbc at 8.5 psi, turboxs rfl-h bov, gutted plenum, etc. blown turbo, under construction.. gt35 coming. |
|
12-01-2005, 01:13 AM | #28 | |
Z Cars Fanatic
|
no the plenums are identical i am pretty sure. there may be a different coolant routing system underneath but that stuff should be removed anyways.
2+2 Twin Turbos are sex because of rarity here in the states. thats the only thing that keeps me keeping the 2+2. BTW: the only thing that sucks about owning a 2+2 is the fact that aftermarket side skirts look like poop on them without a rear bumper. this is a big problem from me but to others who like the aftermarket rear bumpers, it may not be.
__________________
ZedEx Crew Member #4 |
|
12-01-2005, 10:13 AM | #29 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mooresville, North Carolina
Posts: 1,104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 90 n/a
Well it depends what you are building the Z to do. If you are setting up for drifting then you are better off with a NA 2+2, better more predictable powerband and longer wheel base. If you are setting up for all out numbers and speed then a TT is the setup for you. If you want turns practicality and speed, then you want a TT 2+2. But if you want a non-limo Z for speed and handles corners well too then any of the TT coupes will do. But if your like me and you like your car then stick with what you have.
__________________
Finaly got pics of my car....... after I washed it of course. |
|
12-02-2005, 02:31 PM | #30 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 90 n/a
well my plan was actually to get a nice 2+2 with low miles, and than eventually do a TT swap, cuz I can always use as much space as I can possibly get
__________________
Georgey on the subject of midget beastiality pornos Quote:
R.I.P Andy, you will be missed by all. |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|