Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Toyota > RX300/RX330/Harrier
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
View Poll Results: Which would you pick and why?
2005 Lexus RX330 3 60.00%
2005 Cadillac CTS 2 40.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2004, 03:31 PM   #1
Schister66
AF -Advisor
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 3,897
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Schister66 Send a message via MSN to Schister66
RX 330 v. CTS

Which whould you pick and why?

1.2005 Lexus RX330

2.2005 Cadillac CTS
__________________
2015 DGM STi - 2006 SGM STi - 1999 Built/boosted GSR
Schister66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2005, 07:00 PM   #2
scratchbc
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Washington, Washington DC
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RX 330 v. CTS

lexus because its not a cadillac

I have had the worst experiences with american cars
scratchbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 08:59 AM   #3
shadetreetech
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RX 330 v. CTS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schister66
Which whould you pick and why?

1.2005 Lexus RX330

2.2005 Cadillac CTS
I prefer the Lexus.
I purchased a new Cadillac a few years ago. It was the most expensive car I ever bought but it turned out to be the worst car I have ever owned. The dealership was, like many, full of ---- , err, I mean excuses and doubletalk about the many problems.
So far my Lexus is great.
shadetreetech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 08:28 PM   #4
nopcbs
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Midland, Michigan
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Close one

I just bought an RX330, but I did consider the Caddy SRX (which I think the original poster meant, an RX330 vs a CTS is a silly comparison - apples and oranges). The SRX is better in some ways - way more cargo room, roomier, arguably better looking, RWD-based so better handling,better towing ability. However, its interior is close, but no cigar, the mileage (6 or 8) is quite poor, the 6 version just feels under-powered and works too hard, the 8 is vastly over-priced, and rsale will be poor.

The RX has the benefits of superb fit/finish, decent power and mileage, reliability, ridiculously good resale, very comfy ride and adequate handling. However storage space is poor. The back seats should fold flat and don't; stying is a little troubling (inflated or scared ES look), and ther have been the oil gelling problems.

The Rx is better, but the Caddy is quite close overall and, as I say, better in some ways. Frankly, if it came with a more economical engine, I might have bought the Caddy.
nopcbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 01:15 PM   #5
shadetreetech
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Close one

Quote:
Originally Posted by nopcbs
I just bought an RX330, but I did consider the Caddy SRX (which I think the original poster meant, an RX330 vs a CTS is a silly comparison - apples and oranges). The SRX is better in some ways - way more cargo room, roomier, arguably better looking, RWD-based so better handling,better towing ability. However, its interior is close, but no cigar, the mileage (6 or 8) is quite poor, the 6 version just feels under-powered and works too hard, the 8 is vastly over-priced, and rsale will be poor.

The RX has the benefits of superb fit/finish, decent power and mileage, reliability, ridiculously good resale, very comfy ride and adequate handling. However storage space is poor. The back seats should fold flat and don't; stying is a little troubling (inflated or scared ES look), and ther have been the oil gelling problems.

The Rx is better, but the Caddy is quite close overall and, as I say, better in some ways. Frankly, if it came with a more economical engine, I might have bought the Caddy.

Hey, hope you enjoy the RX. What did you mean by the oil gelling problems with the RX? I'm not aware of that type of possible problem but I would like to be informed. Also, if you chose black as the color, be careful to keep it clean, especially from bird droppings. I was informed via the forum that Lexus/Toyota uses a soft paint with black and does not clearcoat the finish.
shadetreetech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 10:31 AM   #6
Yashveen
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lusaka
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RX 330 v. CTS

the lexus is way better in terms of buil quality...
also it is more elegant and refined as the caddy but
the caddy in some way is more Butch...i
Yashveen is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Toyota > RX300/RX330/Harrier


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts