Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
09-23-2013, 09:49 AM | #16 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Reporting back on what I found... Alignment before(Camber -1.4,-3.4, Caster 4.9,5.2, Toe -0.07, -0.13) Alignment after (Camber -2.5, -2.0, Caster 4.0, 4.3, Toe 0.06, 0.06) Also had to take a little out of the left rear spring to get weights to LF 721, RF 696, LR 760, RR 711 (cross of 1455 and1431). Ride heights were LF 4.25, RF 4.19, LR 4.63, RR 4.5.
Making these changes made a world of difference at Blackhawk (relatively flat track) and I had a best lap time of 1:21.3, which is about the same as my friend's Alpha. I'll put the Torsen and roll bar on my to-do list. Going to Mid-Ohio in a couple of weeks with PCA, so I'll see how this works with elevation changes Thanks again for all the posts / advice! Larry |
|
09-23-2013, 09:01 PM | #17 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Delray Beach, Florida
Posts: 721
Thanks: 16
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
I have been to Mid-O so I have data on what an NASA ST-1 Panoz should run.
__________________
Brian G. 2000 Panoz GTS #420 NASA ST1 427ci Stroker |
|
09-27-2013, 07:01 PM | #18 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 839
Thanks: 8
Thanked 60 Times in 53 Posts
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Quote:
Any particular setup plan behind running the car so high? Kel.
__________________
Kel M Panoz GTRA #17 New Zealand |
||
10-06-2013, 09:43 AM | #19 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Thanks for the replies, sorry about the delay...
Brian - Any data would be appreciated. I have an AIM Solo. What format is your data in? Kel - Thanks for the catch! Honestly, that's just where the car was running (since I bought it). Guess we got side tracked with the corner balance and didn't take any steps to lower to the GTS specs... I did find some other specs that stated 3.75 +/-.2 front and 4.0 +/- .2 for the rear. Interestingly enough, there was no spec. / tolerance for rake... |
|
10-06-2013, 03:04 PM | #20 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 839
Thanks: 8
Thanked 60 Times in 53 Posts
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Quote:
Regards running .75" high on ride height, we have been doing a lot of bump steer work on my car. I am running the car at 3.5" and 4" but with the 680 profile slicks I am running we had .100" bumpsteer each way at 1.5" bump and droop. You may well find you car nicer to drive when you drop it down as you will lower the C of G and get the steering geometry back where it should be all at the same time. Kel.
__________________
Kel M Panoz GTRA #17 New Zealand |
||
10-07-2013, 07:14 PM | #21 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 26
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Kel - Thanks for the additional insights / impact of running higher ride heights! I might just have to check clearance on the trailer ramp and a few other places before I drop her down. Spoiler already drags entering the driveway (trailer won't fit in the driveway, so I have to unload on the street).
Larry |
|
10-09-2013, 04:19 PM | #22 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 355
Thanks: 100
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: Springs, Bars, and Rake
Quote:
I solved that problem by making the air dam removable using Dzus fasteners with pop rivets to secure them. Mike |
||
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|