Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
View Poll Results: 325 is, 318is, or a 318ti? | |||
325is | 56 | 90.32% | |
318is | 3 | 4.84% | |
318ti | 3 | 4.84% | |
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
02-27-2003, 09:09 AM | #16 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
BMW's M44 4 cylinder engines are one of the sweetest ones they've ever designed. Keep in mind, BMW has had much more success racing 4 cylinders than 6's. 318's handle better than 325/328's, and don't have incessant water pump failures, either. The growl of their 4 cylinders in music to the ears, and a sound that seperates Bimmers from Hondas and Lexus'.
An attitude that 318's are "entry level" is truly laughable, and immature at best. Do you honestly believe that everything that costs more is always better? Last edited by 318ti; 02-27-2003 at 04:48 PM. |
|
02-27-2003, 08:52 PM | #17 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 326
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I knew i was going to get some heated 318 owner to reply.
Please understand that i have nothing aganist the 318. and i understand that BMW has raced 4's. The E30 M3 was the S14 4 cylinder which put out 190 some hp and 170 some lb/ft of torque. Just as a side note i have had none of the problems in which you mention, and all bimmer owners i talk to dont have any issues with such as well. Also, i quoted entry level from multiple publications. It has been stated in many books and magazines as being this, i was just relaying it. I am a fan of anyting bmw, even 318's. i was just giving my opinion. at the risk of sounding corny, as bimmer owners we should get together as allies rather then enemies. |
|
02-28-2003, 02:12 PM | #18 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Whichever books and magazines stated that 318's were entry level were written by nitwits that don't even know BMW's history. The prime difference between 318's and 32X's is 4 vs 6 cylinder (though the 318ti does have a different rear suspension). We didn't even have 6's in the 3 series until the 80's, and BMW's most legendary model and racer was a 4 cylinder. Sorry to jump your case, now that I think about it, that does sound like some boneheaded observation by Car & Driver or Motor Trend. European Car would never make such a ridiculous claim, IMO. Many of us prefer a better handling car with a slight sacrifice in drag racing capabilities, especially those of us old enough to have driven and gotten bitten by the Bimmer Bug in a 1970's era 2002 by a boxy little sedan that handled almost like a friggin Porsche.
I traded an Audi A6 for my 318ti, and have not regretted the loss of horsepower for a single day. I certainly don't miss diving nose understeer when accelerating through hairpins, that's for sure. That was the one feature that led me to the 318ti over the 325's I test drove. You're right, we don't need to fight among ourselves, especially considering all these ad hominen attacks from these one post morons who've never owned a BMW, but always seem to have friends that say they are unreliable POS's, lol. PS - I shouldn't have generalized on the water pump problem, but it is an internet wide, commonly known weakness in 6 cylinder E36's from the early to mid 90's. |
|
02-28-2003, 04:50 PM | #19 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 326
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I was just reading about the 99 M coupe that had the E36's S52 engine. they stated that they did have water pump problems because of the use of a plastic impeller.
all i have to say is ure going to have problems with any and every single car, there is no such thing as a perfect car, but i think bimmers are near that mark! if i remember correctly what bmw knew best was 2 liter 4 cylinder engines. but they had wanted to compete with othr euro manufacturers, mainly mercedes, so they figured they needed a bigger engine so thats when they developed the inline 6 for the E21. also if i remember correctly the M1 has a 4 in it. and that was one fast beast. i read once before that their in no replacement for displacement, however i think they can squeeze a lot more out of 4 cylinder mill. they did it for the aforementioned M1. well with that said we know the real deal with bmw reliability, and we know that most bimmers will be able to blow away these honda drivers. and also keep in mind that i am more of an expert on E30's not the 36's and above, although i want something a little newer. but until then i love my bimmer and i am sure all you other bimmer owners out there feel the same way! Happy Bimmer Driving! |
|
03-19-2004, 10:33 PM | #20 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Two thumbs UP ! !
I love my E36 92 325i
"The Ultimate Driving Machine" The Plastic impellers problem: From '92 to early '97 BMW installed waterpumps with orange plastic impellers in all of their 6-cylinder motors. The orange plastic they used becomes brittle and cracks apart after as little as 30k miles so I'd recommend swapping out the original pump ASAP. There's no way to tell if the pump has the plastic impeller without removing it from the engine, so if you're not 110% sure that the stock pump has already been replaced, just change it. Those plastic impeller will break apart with absolutely no warning, no noise, nothing. You'll be driving along and all the sudden your temp gauge will be in the red. When your engine overheats you risk damage to your radiator, damage to your engine and a possible accident due to coolant loss. Trust me, it's definitely better to swap your waterpump BEFORE it blows up. I found this on www.understeer.com very helpful website. Go for it ! ! Were are happy with our Ultimate Driving Machines! Skycity_BMW
__________________
|
|
03-20-2004, 09:33 AM | #21 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 108
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
When you hear of someone having to take their BMW to the dealership every month to get it repaired, there's a very good chance that that car never had any of it's inspections performed. The Bavarians made a maintenance schedule for a reason, and it pays off in the long run to follow it.
__________________
'85 BMW 325e '87 Shelby Lancer #340 '00 Dodge Neon Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. (Rom. 5:1) |
|
04-14-2004, 01:06 PM | #22 | |
AF Newbie
|
Go for the big one... if had heard how the engine sounds then you probably made up your mind...but if you don`t then you MUST do it.
it`s pure german muscle. and don`t count the tuning posibilities that you have to choose from. think think this way... from 175 hp standard...to 250...at low costs. imagine that. |
|
06-05-2004, 03:28 PM | #23 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nassau
Posts: 64
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: advice on which bimmer
I have a 1995 325IS, 105,000 miles, engine is huge, and powerful, no problems at all, when I took it to the BMW guys to get serviced they were like this engine is a freakin monster...
|
|
07-27-2004, 10:46 AM | #24 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: albany, New York
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
the 318 is a dog sorry. 3 series 93 to 95 325 you get vanos dual over heads strong motor. the 325 93 has the same motor as the 95 m3 the only real differance is in the cams and engine software. getting alot more car for the money.
|
|
07-27-2004, 11:22 AM | #25 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: albany, New York
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Dmc12
DMC "Defective motor company" is that what it stands for . sorry buddy but it will never be a Ferrari or a Lotus!
|
|
07-27-2004, 11:32 AM | #26 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: albany, New York
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: advice on which bimmer
Quote:
|
||
07-27-2004, 11:38 AM | #27 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: albany, New York
Posts: 184
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: advice on which bimmer
Quote:
|
||
07-29-2004, 10:27 PM | #28 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Carbondale, Illinois
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: advice on which bimmer
I am considering a 92+ 325 is, 318is, or 318ti. Are there any major problems with these cars??? what is the tunability of all of them as well? Im looking to spend under 8k on this car
I have a 93 325is that I bought used with 120,000 miles. It was mint when I bought it for $5500, and still is now that it has 134, 000 miles. My car has been tuned by the previous owner with used M3 parts, it also has intake, exhaust, and a computer chip. It's quick, although I am thinking about getting a bike to satisfy my need for speed. for 8,000 you can get a great car. check mine out if you want. www.cardomain.com/memberpage/649550 My previous car was a 1998 ford mustang gt. it's not half the car my BMW is, although it had half the miles of the BMW when i got rid of it. It was not much faster either. |
|
12-08-2004, 07:29 PM | #29 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Forney, Texas
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: advice on which bimmer
i own a '95 325i and it is elite, i payed $8600 with 56k miles on it
|
|
12-12-2004, 08:29 PM | #30 | |
Scuderia Kimi
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,746
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This thread is from 2002, and the guy that origionally started this has never posted since. I think im going to close this one.
__________________
Kimi Raikkonen 2007 WDC Scuderia Ferrari 2007 WCC "I collect walnuts" -Kimi Raikkonen on his hobbies outside of F1 |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|