Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
03-10-2005, 11:01 AM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
P size vs. LT size.
So I am about to buy some 235/75/15 tires for my 96 2WD Jimmy and I encounter that there is a P235/75/15 and a LT235/75/15.
What is the difference? I never take my truck off-road, only highway and street driving. can anyone advise? Thanks!! |
|
03-10-2005, 11:19 AM | #2 | |
Problem?
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,247
Thanks: 63
Thanked 113 Times in 93 Posts
|
Re: P size vs. LT size.
P = Passenger car
LT= Light Truck size is the same I think LTs have thicker side walls |
|
03-10-2005, 12:00 PM | #3 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thicker side walls? Oh, ok. i also thought LT meant "Light Truck". But I hope performance wise there isn't a difference.
|
|
03-13-2005, 02:36 PM | #4 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: farmington, Maine
Posts: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: P size vs. LT size.
blazee is right lt has a thicker sidewall to keep your heaver truck more stable during turns. as far as performance look at the other letters on the tire. there should be ratings for speed, wear, traction.
__________________
technology is great when it works but one big pain in the ass when it doesn't Detroit Iron Rules, all the rest are just toys! |
|
03-14-2005, 08:28 AM | #5 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blank
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: P size vs. LT size.
LT's will give a much rougher ride.
|
|
03-14-2005, 09:20 AM | #6 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 95
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks all for your input. I checked the tires out and there was really no big difference in the looks of it. I thought the LTs would look a lot more rugged, but the P sized where pretty much the same. Besides I dont put much weight on my Jimmy to have Lts on it.
|
|
03-14-2005, 05:54 PM | #7 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: farmington, Maine
Posts: 370
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: P size vs. LT size.
the LT rateing is for trucks, doesnt have anything to do with what you put in it weight wise. it has to do with stability in cornering, passenger tires are not made for trucks, trucks by there nature are taller and more prone to rollover (they have a higher center of gravity than cars) that is one dam good reason to use the LT's. your driving a truck not a car buy the LT's they are more stable during lane changes, cornering and the like. i would no more put passenger tires on a truck than i would put slicks on it.
__________________
technology is great when it works but one big pain in the ass when it doesn't Detroit Iron Rules, all the rest are just toys! |
|
03-15-2005, 08:54 AM | #8 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blank
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: P size vs. LT size.
The LT tires themselves are rated to carry more weight. The reason that LT's don't increase the weight-carrying capability of a Blazer fitted with P-series tires is that the suspension and drivetrain are the limiting factors in weight rating.
The correct size and rating for tires is shown on a sticker on the driver door post. A factory suspension is desingned and tuned to work with the flex inherent in a P series tire. Changing to LT's will give a rougher ride. When cornering, the LT tire will stay stiffer and straighter, but the suspension will have to move and twist even more to compensate, so you may in fact be more prone to rollover, not less. LT tires are also heavier. More unsprung weight will decrease performance, gas milage and handling. |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|