Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: What is Better
MUSTANG GT 20 29.41%
CAMARO Z28 48 70.59%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2003, 02:51 PM   #1
Roadster2
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ford Mustang GT VS Chevrolet Camaro Z28

well here it is everyone the biggest showdown for all comparisons the Mustang GT vs the Camaro Z28. well i like the mustang better and here is why

Bigger Wheelbase but not by much 101.3 vs 101.1
More Rear Leg Room 29.9 vs 26.9
Better Gas Mileage 18/26 vs 18/25

and MUSTANG IS THE BEST SELLER AND THATS WHY THE CAMARO IS GONE
Roadster2 is offline  
Old 01-25-2003, 06:10 PM   #2
FYRHWK1
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 324
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FYRHWK1
#1, your gas mileage figures are off, LS1s have gotten up to 30 MPG on the highway. #2 rear leg room? glad you dont own an Fbody, and #3 you're forgetting the extra 70 RWTQ and 70 RWHP the LS1 cars have.
FYRHWK1 is offline  
Old 01-25-2003, 07:46 PM   #3
jon@af
The Media Guy
 
jon@af's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 6,973
Thanks: 62
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
Send a message via AIM to jon@af
I think that if it came down to it and both cars where 6-speed, the camaro would take it. that 5.7Litre V8 is pretty damn powerful. but Im also biased towards GM cars...
__________________




AF User Guidelines <----Click and read if you don't know these.

"Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today."

A Blog By Swigz


Cotidie damnatur qui semper timet; Aquila non captat muscas.
jon@af is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to jon@af For This Useful Post:
markothemechanics (06-18-2016)
Old 01-26-2003, 12:16 AM   #4
Neutrino
Yaya Master
 
Neutrino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bucharest
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
The camaro just kills the gt the ls1 is definetevelly more powerful. A mach one would have more of a chance but that is quite above the standard GT.


Also the mustang is selling so well because of the V6(image car anyone)
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Neutrino is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 02:19 AM   #5
fatninja19
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
Not only is the engine in the Camaro bigger and produces more power, its also have a lot more potential than the 4.6 from the GT. Hot Rod Magazine featured a 10 second LS1 F-body with the stock block and no forced induction. Some hot rodding school built the car, and it wasn't even all raced out.

And stock for stock? the average LS1 F-body with a decent driver runs low to mid 13's.... Although there has been few instances where high 12's have been ran with the spare tire, jack, and tools removed as the only mod.


The Mustang also sells better because Ford advertises it more. Not saying that advertising is bad.. Just wondering why GM didn't publicize the Camaro so much more..
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
fatninja19 is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 02:27 AM   #6
Self
AF Fanatic
 
Self's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 2,838
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Self
Mustang sells better because it's cheaper...CHEAPER...CHEAPER CHEAPER!!!!!

Yea, the Mustang is a cheaper car than the Camaro/Firebird, and that's why it sells better, plain and simple
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo.
Self is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 12:32 PM   #7
fatninja19
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
Quote:
Originally posted by Self
Mustang sells better because it's cheaper...CHEAPER...CHEAPER CHEAPER!!!!!

Yea, the Mustang is a cheaper car than the Camaro/Firebird, and that's why it sells better, plain and simple
I thought that the GT and the Z28 cost about the same?? If I remember correctly... the difference in MSRP was only like 200 bones..

And how's the v6 Camaro cmpare with the v6 Stang?
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
fatninja19 is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 12:57 PM   #8
Self
AF Fanatic
 
Self's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 2,838
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to Self
Quote:
Originally posted by fatninja19


I thought that the GT and the Z28 cost about the same?? If I remember correctly... the difference in MSRP was only like 200 bones..

And how's the v6 Camaro cmpare with the v6 Stang?
Nope, the difference in 2002 was about $3000. Which changes the cost of insurance and the like.
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo.
Self is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 03:23 PM   #9
crayzayjay
CFA
 
crayzayjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mustang, only cos the Camaro is so - damn - UGLY :apuke:

Disclaimer: no offence to any Camaro owners, it's my opinion so please respect it
crayzayjay is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 06:01 PM   #10
fatninja19
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
Quote:
Originally posted by Self


Nope, the difference in 2002 was about $3000. Which changes the cost of insurance and the like.
Ouch!!!
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
fatninja19 is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 09:18 PM   #11
SuPeRcAr_MaN
AF Fanatic
 
SuPeRcAr_MaN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hazleton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by crayzayjay
Mustang, only cos the Camaro is so - damn - UGLY :apuke:

Disclaimer: no offence to any Camaro owners, it's my opinion so please respect it
They weren't THAT ugly. I admit, Camaros weren't the nicest cars, but either are Stangs. I think I would take the Camaro if I had a choice.
SuPeRcAr_MaN is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 09:57 PM   #12
Scott 02
Banned
 
Scott 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Scott 02 Send a message via Yahoo to Scott 02
Heck no. The 2002 Z-28 Camaro will stop the 2002 Mustang GT...eat if for lunch!

2002 Z-28 Engine Specs.

5.7L V8 Engine Type
cast aluminum Block Material
350ci / 5665cc Displacement
10.1:1 Compression
310 / 231 @ 5200 Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm)
340 / 461 @ 4000 Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm)


02 Mustang GT

281ci (4605cc) V-8
Cast Iron Block/Aluminum heads
281ci 4605cc
9.4:1
260hp @ 5250 RPM's
302(lb-ft) @4000 RPM's
Scott 02 is offline  
Old 01-26-2003, 09:58 PM   #13
Scott 02
Banned
 
Scott 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Scott 02 Send a message via Yahoo to Scott 02
Tell me what car you think will get stomped??
Scott 02 is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 12:26 AM   #14
fatninja19
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 1,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fatninja19
And on top of what everything Scott just said.. the LS1 reacts to mods waaaaay better:spam:
__________________
when in doubt, throttle.
fatninja19 is offline  
Old 01-27-2003, 12:55 AM   #15
dolla_bill0913
AF Enthusiast
 
dolla_bill0913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 439
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Did anyone ever look at the power output and engine size comparison, sure the chevy has the bigger engine, but that ford is putting out a lot of power with that littler engine, think what would happen if they put a bigger engine in those mustangs (one the same size as the camaros), heck look at the new concept mustangs, not that I am bias one way or the other.
__________________
dolla_bill0913 is offline  
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2011 Ford Mustang Specs Leaked (400hp!) iafb83 Automotive News Desk 1 09-11-2009 01:31 PM
1980 chevrolet camaro z28 for sale on ebay-$3000! no rust, very nice! dhartley Classifieds 1 03-18-2007 06:26 AM
Help finding Chevrolet Camaro Z28 pettercardoso Car Modeling 10 12-12-2005 01:40 PM
5.0 Battle: 1992 Ford Mustang GT vs. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 kman10587 Car Comparisons 45 07-29-2004 01:15 PM

Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts