Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: What is Better | |||
MUSTANG GT | 20 | 29.41% | |
CAMARO Z28 | 48 | 70.59% | |
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
01-25-2003, 02:51 PM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ford Mustang GT VS Chevrolet Camaro Z28
well here it is everyone the biggest showdown for all comparisons the Mustang GT vs the Camaro Z28. well i like the mustang better and here is why
Bigger Wheelbase but not by much 101.3 vs 101.1 More Rear Leg Room 29.9 vs 26.9 Better Gas Mileage 18/26 vs 18/25 and MUSTANG IS THE BEST SELLER AND THATS WHY THE CAMARO IS GONE |
|
01-25-2003, 06:10 PM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
#1, your gas mileage figures are off, LS1s have gotten up to 30 MPG on the highway. #2 rear leg room? glad you dont own an Fbody, and #3 you're forgetting the extra 70 RWTQ and 70 RWHP the LS1 cars have.
|
|
01-25-2003, 07:46 PM | #3 | |
The Media Guy
|
I think that if it came down to it and both cars where 6-speed, the camaro would take it. that 5.7Litre V8 is pretty damn powerful. but Im also biased towards GM cars...
__________________
AF User Guidelines <----Click and read if you don't know these. "Dream as if you'll live forever. Live as if you'll die today." A Blog By Swigz Cotidie damnatur qui semper timet; Aquila non captat muscas. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jon@af For This Useful Post: |
markothemechanics (06-18-2016)
|
01-26-2003, 12:16 AM | #4 | |
Yaya Master
|
The camaro just kills the gt the ls1 is definetevelly more powerful. A mach one would have more of a chance but that is quite above the standard GT.
Also the mustang is selling so well because of the V6(image car anyone)
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
01-26-2003, 02:19 AM | #5 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Not only is the engine in the Camaro bigger and produces more power, its also have a lot more potential than the 4.6 from the GT. Hot Rod Magazine featured a 10 second LS1 F-body with the stock block and no forced induction. Some hot rodding school built the car, and it wasn't even all raced out.
And stock for stock? the average LS1 F-body with a decent driver runs low to mid 13's.... Although there has been few instances where high 12's have been ran with the spare tire, jack, and tools removed as the only mod. The Mustang also sells better because Ford advertises it more. Not saying that advertising is bad.. Just wondering why GM didn't publicize the Camaro so much more..
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
|
01-26-2003, 02:27 AM | #6 | |
AF Fanatic
|
Mustang sells better because it's cheaper...CHEAPER...CHEAPER CHEAPER!!!!!
Yea, the Mustang is a cheaper car than the Camaro/Firebird, and that's why it sells better, plain and simple
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo. |
|
01-26-2003, 12:32 PM | #7 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Quote:
And how's the v6 Camaro cmpare with the v6 Stang?
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
||
01-26-2003, 12:57 PM | #8 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Quote:
__________________
There's no replacement for displacement...No, not even a turbo. |
||
01-26-2003, 03:23 PM | #9 | |
CFA
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 9,529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Mustang, only cos the Camaro is so - damn - UGLY :apuke:
Disclaimer: no offence to any Camaro owners, it's my opinion so please respect it |
|
01-26-2003, 06:01 PM | #10 | ||
AF Fanatic
|
Quote:
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
||
01-26-2003, 09:18 PM | #11 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hazleton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,503
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
||
01-26-2003, 09:57 PM | #12 | |
Banned
|
Heck no. The 2002 Z-28 Camaro will stop the 2002 Mustang GT...eat if for lunch!
2002 Z-28 Engine Specs. 5.7L V8 Engine Type cast aluminum Block Material 350ci / 5665cc Displacement 10.1:1 Compression 310 / 231 @ 5200 Horsepower (hp / kw @ rpm) 340 / 461 @ 4000 Torque (lb-ft / Nm @ rpm) 02 Mustang GT 281ci (4605cc) V-8 Cast Iron Block/Aluminum heads 281ci 4605cc 9.4:1 260hp @ 5250 RPM's 302(lb-ft) @4000 RPM's |
|
01-26-2003, 09:58 PM | #13 | |
Banned
|
Tell me what car you think will get stomped??
|
|
01-27-2003, 12:26 AM | #14 | |
AF Fanatic
|
And on top of what everything Scott just said.. the LS1 reacts to mods waaaaay better:spam:
__________________
when in doubt, throttle. |
|
01-27-2003, 12:55 AM | #15 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 439
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Did anyone ever look at the power output and engine size comparison, sure the chevy has the bigger engine, but that ford is putting out a lot of power with that littler engine, think what would happen if they put a bigger engine in those mustangs (one the same size as the camaros), heck look at the new concept mustangs, not that I am bias one way or the other.
__________________
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
Thread Tools | |
|
|