 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: s2000 or 350z | |||
| s2000 |
   
|
7 | 77.78% |
| 350z |
  
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
04-17-2005, 10:34 PM
|
#31 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: colorado springs, Colorado
Posts: 419
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: s2000 or 350z
Quote:
__________________
current rides: 1990 Turbo Miata lifted and locked 96 Grand Cherokee with other toys under the hood retired rides: 1996 Eclipse GSX 1991 Stealth 1991 Porsche 993 C2 1988 BMW 520i Your SUV isn't a Jeep, and my Jeep isn't an SUV.... SCCA, where you actually learn to drive |
||
|
|
|
04-17-2005, 10:37 PM
|
#32 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
lol ya i know...
|
|
|
|
|
04-20-2005, 02:40 AM
|
#33 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon
Posts: 467
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
i would take the S2000. Better handeling, smaller car, only like....39? less hp, and you gotta love that push to start botton. and just the fact that it makes the most N/A HP/L out of any car in the world is pretty badass.
__________________
95 Integra GSR, I/h/e, 15" TSW wheels, short shift, front & rear swaybar, lowered 2", 93 GSR head & intake manifold 
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-20-2005, 12:32 PM
|
#34 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Re: s2000 or 350z
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
04-20-2005, 08:01 PM
|
#35 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Salinas, California
Posts: 3,676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd take the 350Z. And this is coming from a Honda owner.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-22-2005, 10:10 PM
|
#36 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: torrance, California
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i would take the s2k by a longshot. my dad has one and it hauls. but thats kinda bias
__________________
pigs will fly! My s2k will smoke u! [img]s2k.bmp[/img] |
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2005, 07:35 PM
|
#37 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
depends what you're looking for. S2000 is a little more of a track car, with a harsher ride and less functionality. However, it's a fun, high revving, amazing handling car. The 350 is quite a bit more torquey, and has some more usable features. If you're leasing, the 350 doesn't come close to the S in price, otherwise, they're about comparable.
__________________
Exotic Cars |
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2005, 01:26 AM
|
#38 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
Quote:
mwaahahaha.. serious though..i just love the S2K.. |
||
|
|
|
11-13-2005, 10:02 PM
|
#39 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
 Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
my friend has a 350z. aaaaaand he's trading it in for a s2000. s2000 is just more fun. i love the z, but the performance isn' what'd you'd expect. to me the only thing it has going for it is the exterior. just my opinion
__________________
At the time, McLaren was racing successfully with Honda engines, and it seemed logical to approach Honda for an engine meeting Murray's requirements. But the Japanese declined, feeling that they could not spare the capacity to develop such a project. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-13-2005, 10:17 PM
|
#40 | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
and the exhaust..i love the exhaust on 350's and G's
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#41 | |
|
AF Newbie
 Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nacogdoches, Texas
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
i personally owna honda, but i would take the 350z over the s2k anyday. you can just slap a turbo on the z and you will tear off on an s2k.
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 01:54 PM
|
#42 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
likewise. you can slap a turbo on a s2k and do the same thing
__________________
At the time, McLaren was racing successfully with Honda engines, and it seemed logical to approach Honda for an engine meeting Murray's requirements. But the Japanese declined, feeling that they could not spare the capacity to develop such a project. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 03:09 PM
|
#43 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nacogdoches, Texas
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
the s2k already has a turbo idiot. think about it
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 06:23 PM
|
#44 | ||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Re: s2000 or 350z
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 06:23 PM
|
#45 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: s2000 or 350z
excuse me...idiot. Honda has not yet made a factory turbo'd car. Therefore the s2000 does NOT come with a turbo. Don't speak what you don't know. Look it up jackass then edit your post
__________________
At the time, McLaren was racing successfully with Honda engines, and it seemed logical to approach Honda for an engine meeting Murray's requirements. But the Japanese declined, feeling that they could not spare the capacity to develop such a project. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
